Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject China: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Slashem (talk | contribs)
archive dec 2007
Line 10: Line 10:


{{TOCright}}
{{TOCright}}


== The Eve of Chinese New Year has been prodded ==

someone has [[WP:PROD]] proposed to delete [[The Eve of Chinese New Year]]. [[Special:Contributions/132.205.99.122|132.205.99.122]] ([[User talk:132.205.99.122|talk]]) 23:32, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

== Request for thoughts on article title for Emperor Zhongzong of Tang's daughter ==
I am planning to (soon) write an article on the daughter of [[Emperor Zhongzong of Tang]] and [[Empress Wei (Zhongzong)|Empress Wei]], personal name Li Guo'er (李裹兒) and title Princess Anle (安樂公主). I would like some comments on whether "Li Guo'er" or "Princess Anle" would be the more appropriate title. --[[User:Nlu|Nlu]] ([[User talk:Nlu|talk]]) 19:57, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
:I'm inclined to say that "Princess Anle of Tang" or something similar should be used, because that follows the convention of naming this type of article with the formal name. Emperor Zhongzong of Tang is itself a formal name, isn't it?--[[User:Danaman5|Danaman5]] 21:07, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
::Yes, although that's only because of consensus at [[WP:NC-ZH]]. Since other Tang princesses aren't referred to as "of Tang" in article titles (see [[Princess Taiping]], [[Princess Wencheng]], [[Princess Pingyang]]), I think, if we're going with formal titles, "Princess Anle" would be sufficient. --[[User:Nlu|Nlu]] ([[User talk:Nlu|talk]]) 21:29, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

With no other thoughts on this matter, I think for now (and I'm planning to write this article tonight unless something else ties me up) I'll go with [[Princess Anle]] as the title; it can always be moved later. --[[User:Nlu|Nlu]] ([[User talk:Nlu|talk]]) 23:20, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

==Fake airline... article in Chinese!==
I found a Chinese article of [[Metis TransPacific Airlines]], which seems to be a fake airline that is notable for creating a booking site and having speculation about its true identity.

Anyhow, there is an incomplete Chinese article. Does anyone want to finish and fill it? [[User:WhisperToMe|WhisperToMe]] 05:35, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

== Chinese swords ==

[[Chinese swords]] has been nominated for deletion at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chinese swords]] [[Special:Contributions/132.205.99.122|132.205.99.122]] ([[User talk:132.205.99.122|talk]]) 22:33, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

== Chinese name for Min Chen, killer of Cecilia Zhang? ==
I understand that [[Min Chen]] has a Chinese name, as he is a native of Shanghai. What is his Chinese name? [[User:WhisperToMe|WhisperToMe]] ([[User talk:WhisperToMe|talk]]) 21:08, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
:I have added the Chinese name to the article based on online reports in Chinese.--[[User:Danaman5|Danaman5]] ([[User talk:Danaman5|talk]]) 05:43, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

== Japan was tributary state for China. ==
[[List of tributaries of Imperial China]]

Japan was tributary for China. 亲魏倭王. 汉倭奴国王. 大明属国日本国王.

not only Ashikaga Yoshimitsu but also 1596(Unified) Toyotimi recieved 册封 as Japanese King.
Some Japanese want delete this.[http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=List_of_tributaries_of_Imperial_China&diff=176584565&oldid=175917443]
so Chinese friend, watch out this page. [[User:HongKongriben|HongKongriben]] ([[User talk:HongKongriben|talk]]) <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|comment]] was added at 19:29, 8 December 2007 (UTC)</small><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:Heh, good luck with that. Japanophiles significantly outnumber every other demographic group (except perhaps Americans) on Wikipedia. --[[User:Miborovsky|Миборовский]] ([[User talk:Miborovsky|talk]]) 04:54, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

::What is 册封? That's obviously a Chinese-only term; what's it in English or Japanese? If it's some sort of seal/stamp of investiture, as the Chinese Emperors granted to the kings of Korea, Ryukyu, and their other tributaries, I'd have to say I doubt that Hideyoshi received it. I certainly could be wrong about that, but I imagine that if he did it would not only cause trouble in his relations with the Court (being a "King" under the Chinese Emperor while there's a separate Japanese Emperor who he's supposed to be loyal to, etc) but would also go against his own desires and plans to create a more powerful Japan, extricated from the Sinocentric model and acting as China's equal in diplomacy and trade.
::That said, I for one would not oppose the listing of Japan as one of China's historical tributaries, as the Ashikaga did indeed pay tribute to China. [[User:LordAmeth|LordAmeth]] ([[User talk:LordAmeth|talk]]) 14:54, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
I mentioned a while ago that what we really need is an article on Chinese imperial tributary relationships. I think this will clear up a lot of the confusion that some people have about such relationships. Mostly, editors coming and going don't want to think of their pet country as having been a tributary to China. But what I do know is:
#At times, they are more like trade relations.
#It is only by accepting a tributary relationship with imperial China that the Chinese court was even willing to have a working relationship with a foreign country.
#The system was used by China's neighbours in the context of their foreign relations with ''each other''. They expected China's military support, and tributaries considered each other as equals - most of the time anyway, depending on the ruler.
I tried to do some online searching on the subject matter, but nothing very substantial came up as sources. Unless someone else can find some good online sources, this may be something that will require some book reading/researching. [[User:HongQiGong|Hong Qi Gong]] <small>([[User talk:HongQiGong|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/HongQiGong|Contribs]])</small> 17:01, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
::It looks like there are sources out there, but I will have to wait until I get back to college to have access to most of them.--[[User:Danaman5|Danaman5]] ([[User talk:Danaman5|talk]]) 06:55, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Ashikaga Yoshimitsu recieved 册封 as "日本国王", by china dynasty. Yoshimitsu united the Northern and Southern Court, then recieved 册封 by China. This 册封 represent to "Japan" country itself. and show China-Japan Diplomatic relation. moreover, after Ashikaga Yoshimitsu, this tributary relation succeeded. Japan recieved "日本国王印" 金印 from china.[http://culture.edu.tw/history/smenu_photomenu.php?smenuid=589&subjectid=1169]{{zh}} it represent to China-Japan relation. Japanese try to hide this truth... Japan was tributary state of China, since Han dynasty("漢"倭奴国王). Japan paid tibute to Han, Sui, Tang(master dynasty of Japan), Song, Ming... Japan recieved 册封 by China dynasty also send tribute to China.
Toyotomi recieved 册封 by china in Ming dynasty 萬曆 24年. (1596 丙申 / 萬曆 24年) 12月 7日 " 倭將行長, 馳報''秀吉'', 擇於九月初二日, 奉迎''冊命''於大坂〔大阪〕地方受封。 職等初一日, 持節前往, 是日卽抵大坂〔大阪〕。 ''次日領受欽賜圭印、官服, 旋卽佩執頂被, 望闕行五拜三叩頭禮'', 承奉誥命。"
: Conclusion, In history, Japan Recieved 册封 by China. Japan send 朝貢 to China. It is reasonable for including tributary list. <small> [[User:Clerkwheelzeon|Clerkwheelzeon]] ([[User talk:Clerkwheelzeon|talk]]) 19:28, 9 December 2007 (UTC) </small>



== Need help from JPOV ==
[[List of tributaries of Imperial China]]
Need protect from edit war. Japanese want omit their country in [[List of tributaries of Imperial China]]. <small> [[User:Clerkwheelzeon|Clerkwheelzeon]] ([[User talk:Clerkwheelzeon|talk]]) 05:55, 10 December 2007 (UTC) </small>
:Really don't feel like diving into an edit war over that article. I've had discussions on the Talk page over there before. But what's ironic here is that I remember having an argument on [[Talk:Japan]] about Japan having been influenced by China and Korea in ancient history, and part of the argument I had to put up with was that "China" and "Korea" didn't really exist back then (which makes me wonder how it was that "Japan" existed). And now that we're talking about tributaries, apparently "Japan" didn't exist back then. The argument is ridiculous. Under the same logic, we might as well begin Japanese history articles on when the English term "Japan" became popular usage. [[User:HongQiGong|Hong Qi Gong]] <small>([[User talk:HongQiGong|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/HongQiGong|Contribs]])</small> 06:16, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
::Yeah, I am certainly not going to get involved in that. Honestly, I wonder sometimes if the list of tributaries of imperial China is really all that useful. Since all countries were required to officially be tributary in order to have relations with China at all, having this list is akin to having a [[List of countries with which the United States has diplomatic relations]], or something like that.--[[User:Danaman5|Danaman5]] ([[User talk:Danaman5|talk]]) 06:52, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
:::Yeah the article is very problematic. I'm not sure what to do with it. Maybe one day I will sit down with some books and write an article that's actually ''about'' tributary relations of imperial China - an article like that would be much better. [[User:HongQiGong|Hong Qi Gong]] <small>([[User talk:HongQiGong|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/HongQiGong|Contribs]])</small> 07:00, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
::::If you would like to, you can edit the article on this subject that I have started in my userspace: [[User:Danaman5/Workshop/Chinese tributary system]]. Note that it is still very preliminary, because as I mentioned above, I won't have access to good sources for the next month.--[[User:Danaman5|Danaman5]] ([[User talk:Danaman5|talk]]) 07:08, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

== 東北大學 ==

[[東北大學]] has returned to AfD. (didn't it just close?) [[Special:Contributions/132.205.99.122|132.205.99.122]] ([[User talk:132.205.99.122|talk]]) 20:53, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
:Note that I'm not trying to get the page deleted. I'm trying to make it into a redirect page, as it is a dab page with only two entries, one of them being the main topic. [[User:HongQiGong|Hong Qi Gong]] <small>([[User talk:HongQiGong|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/HongQiGong|Contribs]])</small> 21:27, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

== Category:Famous pandas ==

[[:Category:Famous pandas]] is up for renaming/splitting. [[Special:Contributions/132.205.99.122|132.205.99.122]] ([[User talk:132.205.99.122|talk]]) 19:14, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

== Problem with Christian users and Christianity in China ==

* http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:Christianity_in_China#Christian_manipulations <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/80.180.11.90|80.180.11.90]] ([[User talk:80.180.11.90|talk]]) 21:06, 12 December 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Opinions by sinologists and Chinese people ==

Hi, can you help me with [http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:Christianity_in_China#The_article_continues_to_be_POV this issue]? --[[User:Esimal|Esimal]] ([[User talk:Esimal|talk]]) 14:14, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

== [[The Rape of Nanking (book)]] for peer review ==

I've listed [[The Rape of Nanking (book)]] for peer review. Please take a look. There's already plenty of criticism of the book mentioned in the article, but one editor is insisting on inflating the article with even more criticism. And surprised! He's heavily into editing Japan-related topics. [[User:HongQiGong|Hong Qi Gong]] <small>([[User talk:HongQiGong|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/HongQiGong|Contribs]])</small> 06:00, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

:Whether he is heavily editing Japan-related topics or you are heavily editing China-related topics is not relevant in this matter. I'll assume you didn't mean to insinuate anything negative by it, but you did appear to be saying that editing Japan-related topics is somehow a sign of prejudice in the subject area of the article.
:If you do feel he is acting in bad-faith, etc then please discuss how he edits, not what the gepgraphical location of the articles he edits is. [[User:John Smith&#39;s|John Smith&#39;s]] ([[User talk:John Smith&#39;s|talk]]) 13:00, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
::You understand the controversy around the book. And I'm sure you remember the article's last FAC. It received three votes, all oppose, and all of them from members of the Japan military history taskforce, with none of the concern being of MoS problems, but that they dislike the content of the article. Maybe I'm assuming bad faith, but yes, I'm concerned about that. Now I'm trying to improve it for a second FAC, and a Japanese or Japan-interested editor goes and inflate the article with more criticism. So admittedly I'm a bit frustrated. I know I've expanded the criticism section of the article. When was the last time a Japan-interested editor expanded on other aspects of the article other than the criticism section? Anyway, sure, maybe I'm wrong in particular about Saintjust, and I entertained that possibility until he wrote ''That an editor from China has been lucky enough to edit the article all he likes on his own for the past several months is quite amazing''[http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment&diff=prev&oldid=178254103]. There's mutual mistrust between me and him, with him thinking I'm trying to somehow cover up the controversy around the book. Except that evidence would seem to contradict that by the simple fact that the version I like introduces the book as being controversial and having been criticised, and already had a criticism section which I personally expanded. And you'll notice that he's trying to get the article delisted as GA based not on GA criteria, but on some unfounded assumption that I'm trying to cover up the controversy around the book. [[User:HongQiGong|Hong Qi Gong]] <small>([[User talk:HongQiGong|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/HongQiGong|Contribs]])</small> 18:09, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
:::Article content is important when assessing FA standard - MoS isn't enough. But you missed the fundamental point with the last FAC, which is that it failed for lack of interest. You can't get FA status with just a nomination, AFAIK. Hopefully you will get some useful peer reviews in the next few weeks.
:::As for this guy, I have no comment to make on his motivations, behaviour, etc as I'd rather not get drawn into that. But as I pointed out, the geographical orientation of what articles someone edits is not relevant - it's how they edit them that is important. If you're getting to the point where you're making assumptions about people based on the former then you probably owe yourself a wikibreak. At the very least you could set up a RfC or something. [[User:John Smith&#39;s|John Smith&#39;s]] ([[User talk:John Smith&#39;s|talk]]) 19:32, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
::::Yes, I know MoS isn't the only concern in a FAC - and I didn't say it was. What I said was that it got three votes, all opposing, all from members of Japan military taskforce, and all had ''only'' concerns about article content. Previous experience with FAC and FAR tells me that MoS are major concerns in FA assessment. I'm not so arrogant that I think I can produce an article free of MoS concerns, in fact I kept asking for MoS critiques. If the situation was different, like perhaps, others from Japan military taskforce voting to promote, or even opposing based on at least ''some'' MoS concerns, which are perfectly neutral, I wouldn't be concerned about the possibility of bias assessment. There were I think at least 2 other editors commenting that did not vote. Your average FAC is going to get about that many editors commenting and voting. The problem wasn't a lack of interest - there's plenty of interest from Japan-interested editors. Even having said that, I have improved upon the article since that FAC. I've put in a short summary of the book (one of the problems that you yourself pointed out), and I've expanded the criticism section since, based on the critique from the other two voters who thought there wasn't enough coverage on why the book was controversial. [[User:HongQiGong|Hong Qi Gong]] <small>([[User talk:HongQiGong|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/HongQiGong|Contribs]])</small> 21:38, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

== Sun Bin ==
I've filed an RFC on an anonymous user's insistence that "Sun the Mutilated" and "Sun Tzu II" be included as alternative names for [[Sun Bin]]. If anyone has an opinion on this, please discuss on [[Talk:Sun Bin]]. --[[User:Nlu|Nlu]] ([[User talk:Nlu|talk]]) 19:04, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

:Again, I hope people can comment on this. --[[User:Nlu|Nlu]] ([[User talk:Nlu|talk]]) 17:21, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

== Article name for Wu Zetian's lover ==
I'd like some opinion on this: should an article on the first well-known lover of [[Wu Zetian]] -- a man named Feng Xiaobao (馮小寶) whom she later put into the disguise of a Buddhist monk, with the name Huaiyi (懷義), be entitled [[Feng Xiaobao]] or [[Huaiyi]]? (I am leaning toward the latter.) --[[User:Nlu|Nlu]] ([[User talk:Nlu|talk]]) 18:06, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
:Given a lack of comment on this, I'm going to go with [[Huaiyi]]. The article can always be moved later if necessary. --[[User:Nlu|Nlu]] ([[User talk:Nlu|talk]]) 05:20, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
::[[Huaiyi]] does sound better, since that's how he is referred on formal texts anyways. [[User:AQu01rius|Aquarius]]&nbsp;&#149;&nbsp;[[User_talk:AQu01rius|talk]] 22:37, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

== Lý Nam Đế ==
(Will also be posted to [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Vietnam]].)
There is an anonymous editor who insists on (without discussion) removing Chinese characters and [[pinyin]] of [[Lý Nam Đế]]. Now, before I am to treat this person as a vandal, I'd like to get some general feelings about this. If you can, please discuss the issue on [[Talk:Lý Nam Đế]]. Thanks. --[[User:Nlu|Nlu]] ([[User talk:Nlu|talk]]) 05:02, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

== Overseas Chinese benevolent associations ==

I'm guessing that someone who knows Chinese could greatly improve the descriptions of pictures in [[:Commons:Category:Overseas Chinese benevolent associations]]. Also, I wouldn't be surprised if there are pictures on Commons (or that should be on Commons) that belong in this category, but which I didn't find because I didn't know where to look. - [[User:Jmabel|Jmabel]] | [[User talk:Jmabel|Talk]] 21:49, 26 December 2007 (UTC)


== List of all prefecture-level divisions? ==
== List of all prefecture-level divisions? ==

Revision as of 08:00, 19 April 2008

WikiProject iconChina Project‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
ProjectThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
2006 Archive by Month:           June July August September October November December
2007 Archive by Month: January February March April May June July August September October November December

List of all prefecture-level divisions?

I was doing some reading about political divisions of the PRC, and was wondering, is there a list available of all prefecture-level divisions? All province-level divisions are listed on Political divisions of China, but I haven't found one with the prefecture-level divisions yet, and think one might be useful. Granted, a list of all would be rather long and arguably cumbersome, but it could be done similarly to List of counties of the United States, which is divided up by state (i.e., this one would be divided by province-level entity). Indeed, a lot of the legwork would already be done in this case, since we already have articles listing all prefecture-level divisions (along with county-level divisions) for each province. All we'd really need would be a short article, like the US-related one I've linked to, that provides a link to all the [[List of administrative divisions of NAME]], thus providing a centralised point from which one can find them all. Would this be a good way to go about it? Heimstern Läufer (talk) 06:21, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There's already a list of prefecture-level cities for each province and autonomous region. For example: List of administrative divisions of Anhui and List of administrative divisions of Guangxi. They are all linked from Political divisions of China. But there might be value in a list that only links to lists of prefecture-level divisions. Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 15:25, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I see now that all the prefecture-level-by-province articles are listed at Political divisions of China; I had missed that before. OK, here's where I am now: I think List of prefecture-level divisions of China should go somewhere: either as an list itself, or as a redirect. Does this make sense? If so, I see at least three possibilities:
1. A completely new list, listing only the prefecture-level divisions. Cons: It duplicates material found on the articles. Pros: It provides all info on prefecture-level divisions only in one place.
2. A short article similar to List of counties of the United States, which just provides links to the [[List of administrative divisions of NAME]] lists. Pros: less duplication of information. Cons: doesn't provide a place if you only want to find prefecture-level info without county-level info.
3. A redirect to the section of Political divisions of China that provides the links to the [[List of administrative divisions of NAME]] articles. I don't like this solution as much because I don't think it's user-friendly; as someone looking for the prefecture-level divisions of China gets plopped down in the middle of an article in a section titled "provinces".
Any thoughts on this? Heimstern Läufer (talk) 16:26, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I've gone ahead and started work on a complete list. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 06:24, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This category name is highly confusing, since Chinese chess is the common English name for a different board game, and one would naturally expect it to be filled with players of Chinese chess. Any suggestions on renaming it? 70.51.9.174 (talk) 07:47, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well spotted, this needs to renamed. I suggest "Chess Players from China", "Chinese players of Western Chess" or similar. Poeloq (talk) 00:53, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2008_January_5#Category:Chinese_chess_players for discussion. 70.55.87.75 (talk) 05:19, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mongolian barbecue is Taiwanese, correct?

I looked at the Wikipedia article for Mongolian barbecue and it says it is Taiwanese.

I found some sources which apparently verify this, but I want to make sure. Are there any sources in Chinese that describe Mongolian barbecue as Taiwanese? WhisperToMe (talk) 21:30, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

According to this there are two types of Mongolian barbecue - the true and the Western definition. Would be interesting to follow this up. Poeloq (talk) 01:17, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I think the "Western" Mongolian barbecue is the one found in Taiwan. There are articles about actual barbecues from Mongolia. That is covered at Regional_variations_of_barbecue#Mongolian. WhisperToMe (talk) 02:30, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
But both varieties are found in China. --PalaceGuard008 (Talk) 02:49, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The issue is where they come from, though. The authentic variety may be found in "China" - but perhaps the only indigenous area within "China" is Inner Mongolia, correct? WhisperToMe (talk) 02:52, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I had a look on the Mongolian barbecue page. The sources saying that it's from Taiwan would ideally need to be backed up by a cite from someone familiar with Mongolian culture. Statements about so-and-so originating from here or there often tend to reflect a narrow cultural view. Anyway, Mongolian barbecue here looks nothing like that picture - I think we get the more "authentic" Mongol kind. --PalaceGuard008 (Talk) 03:19, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Look at the cite Poelok posted. The person refers to actual Mongolian barbecue as "whole animals roasted on fire" WhisperToMe (talk) 16:06, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I know, but I wonder how in tune with Mongolian culture is Erik Reinert given he is writing about globalisation - the possibility in my mind is that Reinert heard about the "true" Mongolian barbecue from a Mongolian friend (I don't see academic citations about these claims), but the "mock Mongolian barbecue" could be found in other parts of Mongolia. Mongolia, afterall, is a fairly big country with a multitude of clans. Of course, I agree that in all likelihood the stirfry-looking "barbecue" is not Mongolian at all. --PalaceGuard008 (Talk) 21:35, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Authentic Mongolian barbecue looks like this. Although using the animal's skin instead of the milk jug is even more traditional. Yaan (talk) 10:24, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese Wikitravel launched

Apologies for the somewhat offtopic posting, but I can't think of a better place to find people fluent in English, Chinese and Mediawiki. So:

Wikitravel (disclaimer: not a Wikimedia project) has just launched its Chinese version, and I'd really appreciate it if somebody could take a look around and confirm that it's working the way it should. It's been in the works for ages, but finding a "go-between" to liaise between Chinese speakers and the admins has been a real headache. AFAIK, the interface looks broadly OK and the zh-cn/tw/sg/hk switching is working, but my Chinese is rudimentary and there may well be other problems that I'm unaware of. Jpatokal (talk) 08:41, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cultural heritage list

The State Administration of Cultural Heritage of the People's Republic of China has a list of 2,351 cultural heritage relics. This list would be similar to a list of national historical sites and so forth in other countries, and should probably have an article here. You can read something about it in the People's Daily (English version); most sources are in Chinese. The list is on the Chinese WP at zh:全国重点文物保护单位; I'd like to bring it here but I'm not sure what it's called in English (the article doesn't name the list). Has anyone seen a reference to it in English? Rigadoun (talk) 18:59, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chia Thye Poh in Mandarin?

What is Chia Thye Poh in Mandarin? WhisperToMe (talk) 11:31, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nanjing, Four Great Inventions of ancient China

Someone keeps adding irrelevant information about the Nanking Massacre into the Nanjing article, and he's jumping from one IP to another to do it. The same person is also removing sourced passages from the Four Great Inventions of ancient China article and adding his own patriotic analysis. Please keep watch on those articles and others that he might be editing, thank you. _dk (talk) 11:27, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

irrelevant? are you a history ignorant? most people know about holocaust, how many of them know about nanjing massacre? it happened in nanjing in 1937! So adding that information in that article is very relevant! And four inventions in ancient china has nothing to do with foreigner, just because he may have mentioned it, it has nothing to do with him, he wasn't even born when those things were invented —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.3.193.108 (talk) 22:19, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, at least 1.3 billion people know about the Nanking massacre. The massacre is very important to Nanjing, yes. But the information you added, like "Films and books about the Nanking massacre", is not important to Nanjing. And you're missing the point about the 4 great inventions of China, it's true that Needham wasn't even born when the four inventions were invented. But until Needham's Science and Civilisation in China series no one in China collected these four inventions and advertised them as the "Four Great Inventions of ancient China". The inventions, of course, did exist way before Needham, but the term "Four Great Inventions of ancient China" didn't. I hope you understand what I'm saying and stop labelling other people's reversions as vandalism. _dk (talk) 06:07, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pinyin showing up in strange, Asian-style Latin font

Why is the pinyin now showing up so strangely, and can it be fixed? See Wu Man for an example. Badagnani (talk) 19:38, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The problem seems to have resolved itself. Badagnani (talk) 20:18, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Archive

It seems about time to archive this page - I'm not sure how you guys normally handle that. Poeloq (talk) 07:26, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Aquarius &#149; talk 20:59, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese hercules

Are there any Herculean-type people with superhuman strength mentioned in Chinese history? I know each culture has their own superman. --Ghostexorcist (talk) 21:09, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pan Gu, Kua Fu and more. I guess we could open a new task group on expanding the articles of these mythical creatures! Aquarius &#149; talk 08:06, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
... and did anyone notice the Chinese space program template on the Kua Fu article? --PalaceGuard008 (Talk) 23:02, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I've removed it - should have been done a long time ago. John Smith's (talk) 11:44, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jiedushi

I've suggested some guidelines for jiedushi nomenclature at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Chinese). Please provide input if you can. Thanks. --Nlu (talk) 22:49, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Maps

Does anybody know how the China maps were created? To be honest, I find them rather ugly. In my opinion, they could do with being updated to .svg, as they are very "pixely" in the current versions. Sorry to the original creator, it's just my personal opinion. Poeloq (talk) 05:53, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Which maps? Some are quite good, such as those made by User:Croquant. See Yushu Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture. Badagnani (talk) 06:35, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ive been reconstructing the dynasty maps I made on top of the DEMIS maps like this one which I think is of higher quality of my original creation. Just informing everyone that i will be upgrading the maps with more details and quality. Pojanji (talk) 07:40, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mongolian script - .svg images or unicode?

Hi, we over at the Mongolia Work Group thought it might be a good idea to replace most of the Mongol script in WP with .svg images of the script (or actually, I thought, one other contributer gave some indication of approval, noone objected). The reason is that as of now, there seems to be little support for Mongolian script on non-Vista computers, and so the script ends up badly distorted on many systems, or is not displayed at all. Since this would affect some places in the PRC, it would be nice to know beforehand if anybody thinks this is a bad idea, and why. Regards, Yaan (talk) 10:47, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting input on the "History of Manchuria (Northeast China) and Russian Far East" template

http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Template:History_of_Manchuria

http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Template_talk:History_of_Manchuria

Apparently, there has been a longstanding dispute on this matter and there were several referrals to the template page on a few articles on Northeast China.

The use of "Manchuria" has never been recorded in primary Qing-era historical documents and the use of this term in modern media has subsided considerably (if not completely) over the years, with "Northeast China" (a term dating back to the Qing Dynasty) taking precedence. If anyone can take a look at the developments on the template discussion page, please feel free to do so. Laoganma (talk) 00:51, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am opposed to messing with it. The entire {{History of Manchuria}} template was created as a compromise, and messing with it will upset the compromise. It's not ideal, for sure, but I think it prevents more problems than it creates. --Nlu (talk) 05:41, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help us here. It seems to say that there was a Chinese empire in the Philippines but some editors question the verifiability of the article. Perhaps you can help us in the Chinese sources that were provided in the article. Please drop by in our discussion here --Lenticel (talk) 22:27, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Translation needed

I am trying to improve upon the section of Zhou Tong (archer) that describes his fictional youth (as portrayed in a comic book). I was recently shown a Chinese page that does a much better job of summarizing his young life than what I currently have. Could someone please translate the following for me?

周侗,陕西人,少年习武,后拜少林派武师谭正芳为师,得少林武术真传,且文武全才。成年后得到当时地位显赫的包拯赏识,进入军中为军官,后担任京师御拳馆教师。御拳馆有天地人三席,周侗为“天”字教师,地位最尊,和朝中名将宗泽交好,谭正芳最小的徒弟,后来梁山好汉病尉迟孙立就是得周侗引荐给宗泽,担任了登州兵马都监。他还有一个师弟,就是祝家庄的武术教师栾廷玉,后来孙立就是利用了这层关系打入祝家庄内部。因为在朝政上主张抗辽抗金,周侗政治上不得意,因此专心武学,确立了官派正规武术的若干套路,如五步十三枪戳脚,发展自少林的翻子拳,以及周侗棍等。他悉心传授武功,在御拳馆期间正式收徒二人,一个是玉麒麟卢俊义,一个是豹子头林冲,卢俊义广有田产,不作官,林冲则继承了周侗的地位,继续担任宋军中的八十万禁军教头。

期间周侗还有一个记名徒弟,就是武松。武松打虎后,县令孙国卿为了巴结权贵,派武松送虎骨膏到京师给高官,武松滞留京师,结识周侗。周认为武松力大,但是拳术上缺少修为,因此加以指点,可惜二人交往时间太短,仅两个月武松就拜别周侗回乡,此后再未得相见。武松在拳术武术上的不足,在此后多次暴露,比如斗杀西门庆,拳打蒋门神,都曾经吃过亏。但是他跟随周侗入御拳馆游历,大长见识,因此西门庆在狮子楼摆出金猫捕鼠的凶险步子,武松虽然不知破法,却识得厉害。同时,周侗传授武松的鸳鸯腿,也是武松的杀手锏。这一手奇特的武功被武松传授给了好友金眼彪施恩,也成了施恩的看家功夫。周侗年老后辞官,在刘光世幕府做过一段幕宾,刘光世军驻河南,因此得以在汤阴县收岳飞为徒。传说岳飞受周侗翻子拳真传,并加以发展,开创鹰爪翻子门。

I know what it basically says, but I have a feeling that someone here could do a much better job of producing a smooth flowing English equivalent. It would help if the translator has a knowledge of martial arts terms. --Ghostexorcist (talk) 12:31, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, some people at Reference desk/language did it for me. --Ghostexorcist (talk) 11:06, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wu Zetian

I've expanded Wu Zetian and requested a peer review of it. Any review by project members and further refining/expansion would be appreciated. --Nlu (talk) 11:40, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It looks a bit odd with the table of contents on the right and that huge picture. I would prefer the usual Wikipedia layout.--Danaman5 (talk) 02:33, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

dubious material at Chinese mythology

User:ACHKC, who previously contributed deleted articles Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Understanding Heaven and Hell and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Feast of Immortal Peaches, is again contributing novel content to Chinese mythology. This is a diff comparing the outcome of the latest round of editing. However, there are some anon edits mixed in, so it may not be appropriate to revert all. Does anyone have the time to look through the changes and remove that which is idiosyncratic? --PalaceGuard008 (Talk) 08:29, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Should have put this up here earlier. Could you look a the surroundings discussions here and here--Nate1481(t/c) 18:18, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

1990 People's Republic of China airliner collision / Xiamen Airlines Flight 8301

Hello. I found out about the 1990 People's Republic of China airliner collision but I need help building the article since all I could find in English so far was a bunch of New York Times articles. WhisperToMe (talk) 21:40, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I found some pay articles about the disaster, but I cannot see all of them since they are for subscribers: http://news.google.com/archivesearch/url?sa=t&ct=res&cd=0-0&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdocs.newsbank.com%2Fg%2FGooglePM%2FMH%2Flib00246%2C0EB341CEDAA63190.html&ei=CUK_R9SpFp7y6AH0v6DHAg&usg=AFQjCNFP4zg5_E5OrLwK5bLIHGbspG6EPw - 37 FOREIGNERS AMONG 127 KILLED IN CRASH OF HIJACKED CHINESE JET $2.95 - Miami Herald - NewsBank - Oct 4, 1990

and

http://news.google.com/archivesearch/url?sa=t&ct=res&cd=1-0&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdocs.newsbank.com%2Fg%2FGooglePM%2FMH%2Flib00246%2C0EB341CEE9B4C67C.html&ei=CUK_R9SpFp7y6AH0v6DHAg&usg=AFQjCNGu-ZGBWTojX9XEFCNr4ldnpuV7LA CHINA 37 FOREIGNERS AMONG 127 KILLED IN CRASH $2.95 - Miami Herald - NewsBank - Oct 4, 1990

WhisperToMe (talk) 21:45, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And another: http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=NewsLibrary&p_multi=DSNB&d_place=DSNB&p_theme=newslibrary2&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=0F35FE300F48295A&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM "1. Deseret News, The (Salt Lake City, UT) - October 4, 1990

CHINA CLAMPS LID ON GIVING DETAILS OF PLANE DISASTER More than two days after China's worst air disaster in a decade, officials refused to release details about the injured and said families of the dead would receive maximum compensation of $4,250.Foreign diplomats criticized the secrecy about the crash, describing as highly irregular the fact that no details on 53 injured people had emerged by Thursday evening. Officials said 127 people were killed when a hijacked Boeing 737 exploded and crashed into two parked planes Tuesday at..." WhisperToMe (talk) 21:50, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


what/where?

what is the criteria for placing articles in the Category:China versus Category:People's Republic of China or versusCategory:Republic of China or Category:Taiwan for that matter. The categories do not give provide this information. Hmains (talk) 01:53, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Some sweeping changes have been suggested to the content of the History of Xinjiang. Please see Talk:History_of_Xinjiang#Sweeping_changes. An editor has proposed replacing it with the History of Xinjiang/Sandbox. You feedback would be appreciated. Mkdwtalk 10:37, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Debate over inclusion of Chinese names for articles about overseas Chinese

See Wikipedia talk:Manual_of_Style_(use_of_Chinese_language)#Relevance to articles. Badagnani (talk) 01:59, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The sub-sections are really ridiculous:

Debate on traditional and simplified Chinese characters

Can somebody here merge them?   Zenwhat (talk) 22:37, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It seems okay. Badagnani (talk) 22:44, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It's full of OR. --PalaceGuard008 (Talk) 22:23, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone fancy slotting in some characters next to chinese name of Amanita muscaria ?

Hi, in the name section I have ha-ma chün 'toad mushroom', which I thought would be great to get the chinese characters for. All help much appreciated. [[::User:Casliber|Casliber]] ([[::User talk:Casliber|talk]] · [[::Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 23:01, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Done -- Миборовский (talk) 00:30, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks much appreciated! [[::User:Casliber|Casliber]] ([[::User talk:Casliber|talk]] · [[::Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 00:50, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

User:Aomen and {{WPCHINA}} tagging

Hi there

I've noticed Aomen (talk · contribs) mass-tagging many articles with the most tenuous links with China (Chinese culture, history, etc.). He's received numerous complaints already. Is he a member of your wikiproject? Do his actions have your support? I'm just wondering, because it seems strange that you guys want to take care of all these (IMHO non-China-related) articles he has tagged. If his actions are not supported by your wikiproject, I'm taking his actions to be vandalism. --Rifleman 82 (talk) 05:33, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What are some examples? Badagnani (talk) 05:37, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Here's just a short list from his contribs: --Rifleman 82 (talk) 05:39, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  1. 11:30, 2 March 2008 (hist) (diff) Talk:Actinidia laevissima‎ (Low)
  2. 11:30, 2 March 2008 (hist) (diff) Talk:Actinidia chrysantha‎ (Low)
  3. 11:29, 2 March 2008 (hist) (diff) Talk:Actinidia chinensis‎ (Low)
  4. 11:29, 2 March 2008 (hist) (diff) Talk:Acrorumohra hasseltii‎ (Low)
  5. 11:27, 2 March 2008 (hist) (diff) Talk:Acer truncatum‎ (Low)
  6. 11:27, 2 March 2008 (hist) (diff) Talk:Acer triflorum‎ (Low)
  7. 11:26, 2 March 2008 (hist) (diff) Talk:Acer miaotaiense‎ (Low) (top) [rollback]
  8. 11:25, 2 March 2008 (hist) (diff) Talk:Acer mandshuricum‎ (Low)
  9. 11:25, 2 March 2008 (hist) (diff) Talk:Acer leipoense‎ (Low)
  10. 11:24, 2 March 2008 (hist) (diff) Talk:Acer laevigatum‎ (Low)
  11. 11:09, 2 March 2008 (hist) (diff) Talk:Acer griseum‎ (Low)
  12. 11:09, 2 March 2008 (hist) (diff) Talk:Acer duplicatoserratum‎ (Low)
  13. 11:08, 2 March 2008 (hist) (diff) Talk:Acer davidii‎ (Low)
  14. 11:06, 2 March 2008 (hist) (diff) Talk:Trimeresurus stejnegeri‎ (Low) (top) [rollback]
  15. 11:06, 2 March 2008 (hist) (diff) Talk:Trimeresurus medoensis‎ (Low) (top) [rollback]
  16. 11:05, 2 March 2008 (hist) (diff) Talk:Trimeresurus mangshanensis‎ (Low) (top) [rollback]
  17. 11:03, 2 March 2008 (hist) (diff) Talk:Trimeresurus jerdonii‎ (Low) (top) [rollback]
  18. 11:03, 2 March 2008 (hist) (diff) Talk:Red-necked Pond Turtle‎ (Low) (top) [rollback]
  19. 11:02, 2 March 2008 (hist) (diff) Talk:Rafetus swinhoei‎ (Low) (top) [rollback]
  20. 10:59, 2 March 2008 (hist) (diff) Talk:Philippen's Striped Turtle‎ (Low) (top) [rollback]
  21. 10:58, 2 March 2008 (hist) (diff) Talk:Pelochelys cantorii‎ (Low) (top) [rollback]
  22. 10:57, 2 March 2008 (hist) (diff) Talk:Ovophis monticola‎ (Low) (top) [rollback]
  23. 10:56, 2 March 2008 (hist) (diff) Talk:Indotestudo elongata‎ (Low) (top) [rollback]
  24. 10:56, 2 March 2008 (hist) (diff) Talk:Impressed Tortoise‎ (Low) (top) [rollback]
  25. 10:55, 2 March 2008 (hist) (diff) Talk:Hemiphyllodactylus typus‎ (Low) (top) [rollback]
  26. 10:54, 2 March 2008 (hist) (diff) Talk:Grass Snake‎ (Low) (top) [rollback]
  27. 10:54, 2 March 2008 (hist) (diff) Talk:Gloydius blomhoffii‎ (Low) (top) [rollback]
  28. 10:53, 2 March 2008 (hist) (diff) Talk:Fujian Pond Turtle‎ (Low) (top) [rollback]
  29. 10:52, 2 March 2008 (hist) (diff) Talk:Elaphe bimaculata‎ (Low) (top) [rollback]
  30. 10:52, 2 March 2008 (hist) (diff) Talk:Dice snake‎ (Low) (top) [rollback]
  31. 10:51, 2 March 2008 (hist) (diff) Talk:Deinagkistrodon‎ (Low) (top) [rollback]
I usually add herbs used in TCM to WPCHINA, as well as animals that are Chinese in origin; I'm guessing this is what the editor is doing? Badagnani (talk) 05:54, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
For example, Rafetus swinhoei really is a Chinese animal. Badagnani (talk) 05:54, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I do accept that many of the article he adds {{WPCHINA}} to do have a link (however tenuous) to China. I just wanted to check if the articles he has added is in the scope of your project, because he *has* received numerous complaints; he does not reply to any of them; this appears to be a single-purpose account (solely for tagging articles).--Rifleman 82 (talk) 06:05, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
How strange. These are very obscure species and I don't know most of them, but I guess at least some of them are of relevance to WPCHINA. It would be much better if the editor would discuss. Badagnani (talk) 06:12, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I definitely agree. Is he part of your wikiproject? If he is, maybe you can talk to him, because he does not respond to anybody else's complaints.
I personally suspect this is an unapproved bot account considering (1) his profligate edits, seemingly without judgment, (2) the speed of his edits, and (3) his failure to respond to *any* comments at his talk page. --Rifleman 82 (talk) 06:26, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
How interesting. I think you should get to the bottom of it. S/he is not listed among our participants, although I've noted his/her edits in the past. Aomen is the Chinese name for Macau. Badagnani (talk) 06:29, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the translation; that part I already figured out, being a native speaker. I'll leave a final request to respond to the many comments at his talk page. If he doesn't respond, I'll block the account as an unapproved bot account. --Rifleman 82 (talk) 06:42, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I've been following Aomen for a while too. The nature and speed of his edits make me suspect a bot account as well. I guess we'll have to block him, but I must say, he has gotten a lot of articles tagged for WPCHINA. (Although some of his tags are improper, he tags a lot of fitting articles as well)--Danaman5 (talk) 06:50, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
He's been given more than fair warning. [1]. --Rifleman 82 (talk) 07:19, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]


I think I was the only one who wasn't negative to this guy on his talk page Lol, and to be honest if I did what he is doing just tagging like that I would've become suicidal long ago.

My explanation is that he is tagging WPCHINA to those within a China-related category. So for example, from the above list:

Actually, can anyone explain what should be tagged WPCHINA? Could also technically everything under Category:China be tagged. Because maybe this is what this guy is doing.

Also, another thought related to this idea is that I don't think it's a bot otherwise why not leave it on permanently and complete the job in a few days. Paul Gard (talk) 22:08, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If that is indeed the case, then I think his contribs should be encouraged. Looking at his edits they seem pretty non-objectionable (IMHO tagging species endemic to China should be within our scope). Why don't we let him do his thing, and we can probably deal with most complaints that people might have on the few miscategorized pages, on a case by case basis. -- Миборовский (talk) 02:25, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yangzhou dialect

Is there an article or section of an article that briefly describes the brand of dialect commonly used in Yangzhou? The reason I ask is because I came across a source that describes the method used in Yangzhou storytelling that relates to the article Zhou Tong (archer). --Ghostexorcist (talk) 19:43, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Update. I think I may have found what I was looking for. Here is the paragraph that I will be adding to the article. Please keep in mind that alot of the terminology, like "square mouth" is already defined in a previous paragraph. Tell me what you think ...

In her studies of Yangzhou storytelling, folkore researcher Vibeke Børdahl noted that a tale about Zhou and his student Wu Song used different forms of dialogue for both characters. Wu Song speaks in square mouth fashion and uses the standard mandarin of northern China, but without short rusheng sylables. Zhou also speaks in squaremouth, but uses the Yangzhou tone system of southern China and rusheng. Therefore, she believes “square mouth dialogue should at least be divided into two subcategories, namely the Wu Song variant—without rusheng, and the Zhou Tong variant—with rusheng.”

It sounds a bit choppy. Maybe someone can help me smooth it out. --Ghostexorcist (talk) 19:58, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Old culture time changes

A new user named "Emoworld" changed the dates to a number of the ancient cultures. I went down his contribution list and reverted his changes. If this person really is making meaningful changes, I suggest someone from WPCHINA ask him where he is getting these new info. Some dates were changed by as much as 1000 years. Benjwong (talk) 05:53, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Large-scale, undiscussed revisions regarding China's territory

Please see http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Special:Contributions/Readin for a list of large-scale, undiscussed revisions related to China's territory and administration thereof. This needs examination. Badagnani (talk) 19:44, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Revert the Stub renaming

I'm going to reopen the renaming proposal as there is one unpopular, not well discussed one. Feel feel to discuss in this Matthew_hk tc 14:17, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding China Southern Airlines destinations

I saw these on the China Southern site, but I am not sure which cities they are supposed to be:

  • Huand Guo Shu (AFAIK it is a typo - it should be Huang Guo Shu)
  • Jiu Zhai Huang Long
  • Kenasi
  • Ying Chuan

WhisperToMe (talk) 18:47, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jiu Zhai Huang Long - sounds like some tourist trap in Jiuzhaigou.
Ying Chuan - Yinchuan, maybe?
-Миборовский (talk) 21:02, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, guys! WhisperToMe (talk) 03:38, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New category, need articles

I have created a subcategory for Category:Stock characters by characteristics called Category:Fictional elderly martial arts masters. I'm sure there are some people on here that know of some articles that can fit into this category. Thanks. --Ghostexorcist (talk) 18:57, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is conspicuously missing all the ORIGINAL elderly martial arts masters... Zhou Botong, Emperor Xuangong, the sweeper monk etc would all fit. --Миборовский (talk) 04:46, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No, elderly martial arts masters have appeared in Chinese novels since the Ming or even before. But I just now added Zhou Botong and Emperor Xuangong per your suggestion (I thought I already added Zhou for some reason). Please feel free to add more characters from Jin Yong's universe that fit the bill. --Ghostexorcist (talk) 19:40, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject China: Articles of unclear notability

Hello,

there are currently 20 articles in the scope of this project which are tagged with notability concerns. I have listed them here. (Note: this listing is based on a database snapshot of 12 March 2008 and may be slightly outdated.)

I would encourage members of this project to have a look at these articles, and see whether independent sources can be added, whether the articles can be merged into an article of larger scope, or possibly be deleted. Any help in cleaning up this backlog is appreciated. For further information, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Notability.

If you have any questions, please leave a message on the Notability project page or on my personal talk page. (I'm not watching this page however.) Thanks! --B. Wolterding (talk) 16:17, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I have looked over some of the articles (though not all yet), and I can give opinions on three of them:
  • Sima Zhen - article on a famous historian and commentator of the Shiji. I found him referenced in a number of sources, a couple of which I added to the article. I think this one is worthy of keeping.
  • Zuo Shu Zhang - I couldn't find any English sources on this, so I looked on the Chinese Wikipedia. It seems to be a relatively minor position in the imperial bureacracy. Maybe worthy of a mention in a larger article, but I'm not sure that it needs its own.
  • Chinese Holy Grail - There is already a discussion occurring about this article, which seems to be trending toward a content merge followed by deletion of this article. If nothing else, it definitely needs to be renamed.

Feel free to disagree with me here. Perhaps someone else can look at the rest of the articles.--Danaman5 (talk) 07:26, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

POV issues

The following have been tagged with POV templates and require discussion or editing to NPOV:

-- Alan Liefting- (talk) - 21:56, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Linfen, China
  2. Tianying, China
  3. Sukinda, India
  4. Vapi, India
  5. La Oroya, Peru
  6. Dzerzhinsk, Russia
  7. Norilsk, Russia
  8. Chernobyl, Ukraine
  9. Sumgayit, Azerbaijan
  10. Kabwe, Zambia

Renaming Terracotta Army article

I've started a bit of work on this article and think that it needs to be broader in scope and renamed. At the moment, for instance, Mausoleum of the First Qin Emperorredirects to it although it doesn't mention the Mausoleum, or any of the other 594 pits that have been found. The Lishan Necropolis or Great Imperial Mausoleum complex or whatever is one entity and should I think have its own article. I guess it has the potential to be big enough to have a separate article Mausoleum of the First Qin Emperor but I don't think it makes a lot of sense to talk about the Terracotta Army in isolation, or the tomb itself without talking about the other buildings, artefacts, the artificial river with the bronze birds, etc. It was suggested that I take the discussion here, so I'm doing that. Thanks.--Doug Weller (talk) 08:05, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There are academic debates about the precise relations between the Terracotta Warriors and the Mausoleum. Theories include that it was actually an army to guard the tomb of one of the First Emperor's ancestors. Supporting evidence include its strange position relative to the tomb, relative distance (much closer to several other Qin royal tombs), and the lack of mentions of the terracotta warriors in historical records.
My view is that there should probably be two separate articles, and the terracotta warriors can be a daughter article of the main article on the tomb complex. --PalaceGuard008 (Talk) 01:26, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I know there is an argument that it was the First Emperor's great grandmother the army was for,but so far as I can seeit isn't one involving very many people on the non-First Emperor side -- I can only find one person, the architect Chen Jingyuan, who is arguing this position -- do any archaeologists support him? I don't understand how the lack of mention by Sima Quian (or anyone else) can be used to argue for an ancestor, lack of mention is just lack of mention. True, it is 1.5 km away from the First Emperor's tomb, but who else had the resources for such a huge project? There was evidently a Ge" (sword) with the inscription "Lu Buwei" found with the army, which points towards the First Emperor. There is simply not enough substance to this argument to merit it being used as a reason for the Terracotta Army to be treated separately from all the other finds outside the mauseoleum itself (let alone in an article separate from the mausoleum). As one book I have says, "The physical mapping of the all required aspects of an eternal imperial life across a large area was one of the principle ways in which the tomb complex created a whole world." If you look at a map of the complex, the bronze birds along an artifical river and the terracotta musicians pit are about the same distance away. The archaeologists agree that this is one large tomb complex. The army is part of it, defending the whole complex not just the tomb and facing towards the mountain pass where enemies from the former states might have come from.--Doug Weller (talk) 08:32, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dehua porcelain

Hello, I come to here to reawaken a merge proposal proposed by User:Marshall46

  1. Blanc-de-Chine
  2. Dehua porcelain factories
  3. Dehua white porcelain in Japan

I think these three articles should be merged to one article because The three are overlapped and all at start status. I think Blanc-de-Chine could absorb the others but I'm not sure this French title is "common name for the porcelains produced in Dehua. According to Britannica it is named as "Dehua porcelain". --Appletrees (talk) 00:55, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dragon bones

There's a suggestion to merge Oracle bones with Oracle bone script. 70.51.9.57 (talk) 08:57, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese wine

Chinese wine is up for renaming. 70.51.9.57 (talk) 04:43, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re-design

I believe it might be a good idea to give the project a redesign along the lines of Wikipedia:WikiProject_Politics to make the project more usable. What do others think? Poeloq (talk) 15:14, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I like their layout. --Миборовский (talk) 05:59, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese Moslems

Hui and Dungan have been proposed to be merged. 70.55.89.181 (talk) 22:53, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CJKV taskforce

The CJKV taskforce has been created to assist in disambiguation of Chinese, Japanese, Korean, and Vietnamese when using Kyūjitai, Hanja, Hán tự, Simplified Chinese, and Shinjitai (Kanji). If you wish to participate, please come and help out. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 18:55, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tones for Jiang Xiaofeng? (蒋小峰)

What are the tones for Jiang Xiaofeng, the hijacker of a Xiamen Airlines flight? The characters are 蒋小峰 WhisperToMe (talk) 03:35, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

99% sure it is Jiăng Xiăofēng (3-3-1), although it would be pronounced 2-3-1 due to the 3-3->2-3 rule. HkCaGu (talk) 15:09, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Help for neutrality of articles

Both the article and the portal are currently full of USA-evangelical pushings and false claims. We need an expert to discuss the phenomenon. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.11.78.218 (talk) 19:15, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Whether Chinese sources can be used on Wikipedia

In a discussion at Talk:Amdo, User:Blnguyen, who is an experienced Wikipedian, says that no source published China can ever be reliable due to the Chinese government's policies on press freedom (I paraphrase. You can see what he wrote youself).

It's the first time I've heard of such a policy, if it exists. Could I ask anyone who knows more about this issue to comment there? Thanks, --PalaceGuard008 (Talk) 09:22, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No such policy exists. Ask him to provide documentation. Миборовский (talk) 04:22, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're kidding me right? If anything, mainland China's news sources serve as important sources for the official stance of the Chinese government on controversial issues. I agree they're going to be bias, but as with anything, this is why we should avoid presenting information as simple facts when it comes to controversial issues. That's why it's important we attribute, and state specifically in articles if any specific pieces of information comes from a Chinese source. Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 07:37, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting help with hotel articles

Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Foshan Hotel and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunshine Hotel, Shenzhen. The two articles Foshan Hotel and Sunshine Hotel, Shenzhen are both weak, but perhaps they could be improved with information from Chinese-language sources. Similarly, the articles Beijing Hotel and White Swan Hotel could be improved with information from Chinese-language sources. Perhaps the hotels have won awards for their architecture or for other reasons. Any such information could also be added to the Chinese-language Wikipedia if you have the time. --Eastmain (talk) 08:12, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested Move on PLA operation/invasion, Tibet

It has been proposed here that People's Liberation Army operations in Tibet (1950–1951) be renamed 1950-1951 invasion of Tibet.

Please join our discussion expressing your viewpoints. 219.73.9.154 (talk) 08:45, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jin Jing article - editor using a blog as a source

Some new editor keeps inserting a blog as a footnote source for the article on paralympic fencer Jin Jing. Please keep an eye on it. Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 05:35, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

deletion of {{Chinese Emperor 6}}

{{Chinese Emperor 6}} is up for deletion at WP:RFD. It is not being used, and Chinese Emperor 0-7 have otherwise been deleted. It s just a redirect to {{Qing namebox}} Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2008_April_14#April_14 Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2007_September_28#Chinese_Emperor_templates 70.55.85.225 (talk) 05:53, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Anna May Wong- Picadilly.jpg

Image:Anna May Wong- Picadilly.jpg is up for deletion at WP:IFD... I'm not sure, but it's about 80 years old, so the copyright ran out? Debate is on whether a free image fulfills the function of this screenshot/pub photo from a film. Though if it is no longer under copyright, then it is a free image, making the discussion moot... does someone know the copyright length? 70.55.85.225 (talk) 06:28, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion

See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abing. Badagnani (talk) 03:53, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Tibet Collaboration

Would anyone be interested in starting a WikiProject Tibet collaboration project? I think with a bit of devoted effort we could bring an article to Featured Article status once every two months or so. I would suggest that, given the current unrest in the region, that we start with a relatively non-controversial topic. I propose Trisong Detsen. Who's with me? --Gimme danger (talk) 06:13, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A rabid deletionist put this image up for deletion today "no rationale." Since the original uploader hasn't edited for two years, I put the rationale in myself, being a good sport. Within an hour this same rabid deletionist again tagged this for deletion, under "non-free use rationale is disputed." Whatever this guy's problem is, this is a useful illustration and I think it should be saved. Can anyone help? Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 05:56, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wǔxiá to Wuxia

Requested rename on the article for the fiction genre from Wǔxiá to Wuxia - see Talk:Wǔxiá 70.55.85.177 (talk) 06:26, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zhou Enlai. PC78 (talk) 00:28, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I watched an advanced screening of the movie on Wednesday night (April 16th). I know it's kind of late since today is the grand opening, but is it possible for someone to fill out a movie's description before any major reviews come out? I would have expanded the plot section, but I was afraid that it would have broken some kind of guideline because it lacked a supporting source. --Ghostexorcist (talk) 16:36, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reading of Chinese name of Dalian No. 24 High School

What is the reading of the Chinese name of Dalian No. 24 High School? The Chinese is 大连市第二十四中学 WhisperToMe (talk) 05:59, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]