Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tropical cyclones

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Wikipedia talk:WPTC)

Good article nominees

(15 more...)

Featured article reviews

Requested moves

Articles to be merged

WikiProject
Tropical Cyclones

WikiProject home (talk)
Archives: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8
| 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16
| 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24
| 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32
| 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40
| 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48
| 49 | 50

Task forces

Western Pacific task force (talk)
Eastern Pacific task force (talk)
Atlantic task force (talk)
North Indian Ocean task force (talk)
Southern Hemisphere task force (talk)
Graphics task force (talk)
2018 FT task force (talk)
Weather of YYYY task force (talk)
Newsletter (talk)
Archives: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8
| 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16
| 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24
| 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32
| 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40
| 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48
Project resources (talk)
Jargon (talk)
WikiProject statistics (talk)
Article requests (talk)
Cyclone Cup (talk)
Vital articles (talk)
Showcase (talk)
Style guidelines (talk)
Awards (talk)

Assessment

Main assessment page (talk)
Assessment tables (talk)
Assessment log (talk)
Assessment statistics (talk)

Tropical cyclones portal

Parent project

WikiProject Weather (talk)

Project notes

[edit]

I just created this wikiproject, after several months of contemplating doing so. I hope everyone working on hurricane articles will get involved. I went ahead and wrote a bunch of guidelines, basically based on current practices...naturally since this is something I just wrote it doesn't necessarily represent community consensus and needs to be discussed. That discussion should probably go here for now...although eventually we may make these pages a little more structured. For a general TODO list, see the "tasks" item on the project page. Jdorje 23:17, 5 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Gulf of Mexico/America

[edit]

Question as the 2025 Atlantic hurricane season will be upon us in a few months: How shall we refer to the Gulf? Drdpw (talk) 16:53, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The way we always have. Wikipedia is an international website visited by people around the world, and it's important to keep terminology as non-biased as possible. I don't want to use the wording bestowed upon us by some convicted felon who happens to be the US president, and don't care at all that he issued an executive order. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:55, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It doesn't even look like the NWS is following the order. [1] ✶Quxyz 23:54, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nevermind, they changed it to GoA. ✶Quxyz 18:02, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
In the same way as we handle the South China Sea? Jason Rees (talk) 16:56, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Let's not let politics intersect with weather any more than we have to. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 20:29, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Our article is at Gulf of Mexico; therefore we should link to Gulf of Mexico. Should the editors of that article decide it should be named differently, then we should follow suit. Til then, it's a non-issue. --21:22, 12 February 2025 (UTC) Golbez (talk) 21:22, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
So, even if NWS/NHC or reliable US-based secondary sources use "Gulf of America," we will nonetheless use "Gulf of Mexico," is that what we are saying? Drdpw (talk) 21:25, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Correct. The whole body of water was never known as the "Gulf of America", even with the executive order. Using "Gulf of America" shows more fealty to a convicted felon who happens to be president, rather than following any kind of accuracy amongst neutral sources, and especially when following the long established precedent of WP:COMMONNAME. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 21:30, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Correct. We only care about their specific words if we're reporting specifically on their words (i.e. a paragraph or article about a warning bulletin, like the infamous Katrina disaster bulletin). Again, all that matters is: If we aren't quoting them specifically, then we should use the name of the article, and presently, that's Gulf of Mexico. That can change. It hasn't yet. This is still a non-issue. --Golbez (talk) 21:34, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Tropical Storm Gabrielle (2007) § Notability?. FozzieHey (talk) 12:03, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Should the infoboxes of every Hurricane seasons be replaced with collage images?

[edit]

Tornado season articles like 2024 and 2022 are having their infoboxes changed to have a collage of the biggest highlights of those years. Should Hurricane Season articles get the same treatment? Hoguert (talk) 16:22, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No because every storm gets its own subsection. Noah, BSBATalk 17:47, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed, the track map is the best way to display all of the storms. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:23, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Climatologically speaking, I believe that tracks of the storms are far more important than what the individual storms look like at peak. ✶Quxyz 00:04, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]