Talk:1992 Pacific hurricane season

Weather: Tropical / Eastern Pacific High‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by the Pacific hurricane work group (assessed as High-importance).

Todo

It needs at least a one sentence description of every storm to be a start.--Nilfanion (talk) 09:39, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I sort of did that! (RaNdOm26 17:00, 23 June 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Nice. Now storm histories are needed for all of them for it to be B class. Hurricanehink (talk) 17:37, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Content and references are minimal, not to mention many SPAG (spelling and grammar) errors. I lowered it to high-importance, since there's no way it's among the most notable hurricane articles. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:48, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I do think it should be raised back to top importance. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 18:28, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

18-E?

Wasn't that the depression that Iniki formed from? Thus, in the article the section that says "Tropical Depression Eighteen-E" should be deleted. Source: here juan andrés 06:12, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed it was. It'd be redundant to have both it and Iniki in the article. --Core desat 06:23, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

TODO 2

An important season must have a nice article. First of all, I removed 18-E, as it was the depression that later developed into hurricane Iniki. Then, the season summary must be more complete. Also, most of the storms are lacking of vital or even, any information and all inline sources must be cited. It is also important to replace those dead external links live and relevant ones. And finally, but not least, add the ACE chart with an explanatory and well written paragraph. This article really needs a lot of work. juan andrés 06:18, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Leave Message ,Yellow Evan home ,Sandbox Happy Veterans day 16:32, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tracks and Pics

Is anyone ever going to add tracks for this season's depressions? (Two-E, Twelve-E, and Three-C) and are there pics of any of these systems? If so, It'd be great to add them. Hurricanekiller1994 (talk) 21:58, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ward

Now that we have Ward, the season ties with the 2005 Atlantic hurricane season, with 28 tropical cyclones formed (excluding depressions that never became storms). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.101.46.183 (talk) 03:04, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Correct. Y E ^Tropical ^Cyclone

Is Ward oficially considered a TC by CPHC while being east of the Dateline? ABC paulista (talk) 05:20, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Jason Rees: Why Ward should be mentioned here? Only JTWC considers that Ward formed east of the International Dateline, neither JMA nor CPHC counts it as a tropical cyclone before crossing into WPAC. And there are tons of storms that JTWC considers that formed in CPAC but aren't supported by CPHC and they aren't mentioned in their respective PHSs here. So, why it should be differnt for Ward? ABC paulista (talk) 16:55, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My view is quite simple we are here to mention all tropical cyclones even if they are unofficial or only monitored by one warning agency - it is after all one of the reasons why we have the other systems sections in the other Pacific basins.Jason Rees (talk) 17:01, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Jason Rees: But in almost all other Pacific Hurricane seasons we have other storms in the same situation of Ward (Typhoon Owen of 1990, Typhoon Dan of 1992, etc), but only Ward is mentioned. No other PHS article has a other systems section.ABC paulista (talk) 17:09, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Then be bold and add them in - They don't have to count towards the overall total or have the infobox.Jason Rees (talk) 17:32, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with including Ward, but why is there a level 2 header for the other storms section after a level 2 header for storms section. I think Ward should get a full-blown section unless you want to put TD's in the other storms section. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 17:56, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Yellow Evan: Why? Since TDs are now included on BT and receive full reports, and they are not as common as on other basins (WPAC and the Southern ones, for example), it wouldn't make sense to include them on that section. I think that other storms section should be created only to add unofficial TCs. And probably, I'll add at least one more TC to this article's other storms section (most certainly Typhoon Dan). ABC paulista (talk) 18:25, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@ABC paulista: I didnt suggest adding NHC TD's to OS - YE did, however, looking at the ones in this season it may make sense too since there isn't a lot of information in their sections.Jason Rees (talk) 19:14, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, cited the wrong nick. I was supposed to ping @Yellow Evan:. ABC paulista (talk) 19:24, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Right now, it's problematic since there are 2 level 2 headers, one for storms and one for other storms. Back then, FYI, TD's did not get TCR's, which is why I suggested putting them in an other storms section. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 14:12, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

But now the TDs have reports, even the old ones. At least, the CPHC's ones. And all of them were included into HURDAT. ABC paulista (talk) 16:04, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@ABC paulista: No one is saying that every single tropical depression from every season, should go into the other storms/systems section. However, with the limited information we have on most of the tropical depressions for this season, it kind of makes sense to investigate lumping them in one section.Jason Rees (talk) 16:18, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think either "Other storm" needs an infobox. It makes the section longer than it should be. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 15:09, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]