Wikipedia talk:Strong

Essays Low‑impact

	This page is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia essays, a collaborative effort to organise and monitor the impact of Wikipedia essays. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion. For a listing of essays see the essay directory.EssaysWikipedia:WikiProject EssaysTemplate:WikiProject EssaysWikiProject Wikipedia essays pages
Low	This page has been rated as Low-impact on the project's impact scale.
	The above rating was automatically assessed using data on pageviews, watchers, and incoming links.

This page was nominated for deletion on 27 April 2019. The result of the discussion was speedy keep.

Why have bolded "support" or "oppose"?

I understand this essay presents a common viewpoint, and I appreciate that it has been written so there's an on-topic place to put my thoughts. I think the essay's argument applies equally to the words "support" and "oppose", yet I very rarely see people suggesting that we should not use these. When I use "strong/weak", as I often do, it's for the same reason that I use "support/oppose": so people can see at a glance what my position is i.e. to increase readability and ease of skimming. The contextual information of what I am arguing for speeds up processing when you read the justification. It should be that no discussion would be closed differently if all the "support" and "oppose" words in bold were deleted: a closer should be assessing the text. But I doubt that this would genuinely be the case in reality. — Bilorv (talk) 17:47, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]