Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/Powderfinger albums

This page serves as a project discussion for the Former featured topic, Powderfinger albums.

Appropriate discussion on this page includes:

Working definition of the topic.
Vital improvements to articles necessary to maintain status for the topic.
Potential improvements to the topic's member articles.
Possible additions to the scope of the topic.

General questions about maintaining good and featured topics can also be referred to Wikipedia talk:Good topics and Wikipedia talk:Featured topics.

	Topic milestones

Date

Process

Result

January 12, 2008

Featured topic candidate

Promoted with articles Powderfinger discography, Parables for Wooden Ears, Double Allergic, Internationalist (album), Odyssey Number Five, Vulture Street, These Days: Live in Concert, Fingerprints: The Best of Powderfinger, 1994-2000 and Dream Days at the Hotel Existence. Did not include Powderfinger

March 5, 2010

Featured topic removal candidate

Demoted

Current Status: Former topic

Powderfinger (inactive)

This page is within the scope of WikiProject Powderfinger, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.PowderfingerWikipedia:WikiProject PowderfingerTemplate:WikiProject PowderfingerPowderfinger

Australia: Music

	Australia portal Featured topics/Powderfinger albums is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
	This page is supported by WikiProject Australian music.

Alternative music

This page is part of WikiProject Alternative music, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopedic coverage of articles relating to alternative rock. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.Alternative musicWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative musicTemplate:WikiProject Alternative musicAlternative music

Working definition

This topic albums of Powderfinger, be they studio, live or compilation - rst20xx (talk) 20:43, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vital improvements

None - rst20xx (talk) 20:43, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Potential improvements

The 5 GAs could become FAs - rst20xx (talk) 20:43, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possible additions

Some possible expansions are:

The live DVDs Sunsets (DVD) and Across the Great Divide Tour (DVD)
Powderfinger's four EPs Powderfinger (EP), Transfusion (EP) (a GA), Mr Kneebone and The Triple M Acoustic Sessions
Powderfinger's singles
Any songs Powderfinger have covered, or any other songs of theirs with articles
Possibly (a bit tenuous but) the discographies of their related bands

- rst20xx (talk) 20:43, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed move to "Featured topics/Powderfinger discography"

I propose moving this page to "Featured topics/Powderfinger discography". This topic essentially covers the band's discography (studio albums), and it seems a bit confusing/unencyclopedic to call it "Powderfinger albums". Please note that a precedent for this move has already been set by Featured topics/Wilco discography. Grim (talk) 00:09, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure - EPs (etc.) aren't included, so it's not a full discography. Dihydrogen Monoxide 08:15, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not to mention singles. Many of the singles are the stubbiest of the stubs. We'll GA them all eventually, though. For now, it should remain "albums", as the precedence set by Wilco. --rm 'w a vu 10:38, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Wilco precedent is to use "Discography", but yeah, they don't include singles either. Dihydrogen Monoxide 11:34, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's realistic to call it "discography". Discographies can be featured topics without having every little sub article (singles and ep pages) at GA or FA class. This is their basic discography. Studio albums are the basic discography. This page should be moved to be more consistent with Wilco; which is correct by both logic and simplicity. Grim (talk) 18:21, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, since I went against it, I won't move it myself, but either of you feel free to do so. Dihydrogen Monoxide 10:12, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]