Wikipedia talk:Featured lists/mismatches

Other processes?

There may be some other bots or processes that are occurring that effect this report ie. certain things get done automatically at a certain date and time. If this report is being generated before those processes have had a chance to complete, the report might give false positives. Please let me know if there is a better time to run the report. -- GreenC 17:20, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't noticed any issues so far for what it's worth @GreenC. I believe the only process we might be concerned about is the bot that does promotions, which runs at 8:25 EST (both AM and PM), with the three people doing the promotions typically doing so before the 8:25pm run. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:32, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks. I won't try to fix what is not broken! Something to keep in mind. It previously came up in the Featured Articles mismatch report. -- GreenC 02:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations not transcluded

Hey @GreenC, I was wondering if it would be difficult to add an additional report to the page. PresN and I try to regularly check for nominations that haven't been transcluded to WP:FLC, but it seems like we missed one which has gone un-transcluded for 28 days. Category:Wikipedia featured list candidates contains the nomination pages that are open. Any way a check for this could be integrated so that we can catch these sooner? Hey man im josh (talk) 20:31, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Hey man im josh, is the requirement that every article name in the Category has a corresponding page Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/articlename/archive1? -- GreenC 20:53, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]