Wikipedia talk:WikiProject African diaspora

This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject African diaspora and anything related to its purposes and tasks.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Shortcut

WT:AFRO

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7: 92 days

African diaspora

This page is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles

Africa

This page is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles

Entries on notable African American subjects trapped in Draftspace

I would be glad to have help with:

Draft:Chambers Park
Draft:Lucky Gamblers
Draft:Pythian Temple (St. Louis)
Draft:Marquette Park (St. Louis)
Draft:Thomas Floyd (Louisiana), in article space for a while, now at Draft:Thomas Floyd (politician)
Draft:The Lady Fare
Draft:Curtis Cavielle Taylor

Enslaved v. slave in article naming

Hello project members, recently an article I started under the title Angela (enslaved woman) was moved to Angela (slave) - my understanding is that enslaved is the better terminology to use as it describes the act that was forced on people, and does not suggest it was their identity. However the mover, said they were following a convention for XXX (slave). I wondered if there had already been a discussion about this or an RfC more widely? Lajmmoore (talk) 13:01, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lajmmoore, That is my undersanding as well. I think that someone may have sought to make a shorter article title without realizing that it is inappropriate to name someone a "slave". I came here looking for a WP reference for the use of "enslaved person" over "slave", for now I have been using external sources. It would be better to have a Wikipedia link.–CaroleHenson (talk) 22:42, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See Slavery#Terminology.–CaroleHenson (talk) 23:43, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, there's no need to force uniformity between article titles, so the change wasn't necessary. Lewisguile (talk)

A move discussion ended in favour of slave for certain article titles, Talk:List_of_slaves#Requested_move_16_November_2021. Rsk6400 (talk) 06:58, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move at Talk:Anti-Black sentiment#Requested move 22 June 2024

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Anti-Black sentiment#Requested move 22 June 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 21:58, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It would be great if more people could weigh in on this. Lewisguile (talk) 05:52, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone able to weigh in on the new move request? https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:Anti-Black_sentiment#c-Alexanderkowal-20240521082100-BilledMammal-20240521045300 There is a request to move Anti-Black sentiment to Anti-Black racism. Lewisguile (talk) 08:18, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Mary McLeod Bethune

Mary McLeod Bethune has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 04:17, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Notorious B.I.G. nominated at FAR

I have nominated The Notorious B.I.G. for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 04:48, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Brown v. Board of Education

Brown v. Board of Education has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 20:54, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Green's October 2024 edit-a-thon

Hello WikiProject African diaspora:

WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long Good Article Edit-a-thon event in October 2024!

Running from October 1 to 31, 2024, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) edit-a-thon event with the theme Around the World in 31 Days! All experience levels welcome. Never worked on a GA project before? We'll teach you how to get started. Or maybe you're an old hand at GAs – we'd love to have you involved! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films) during the event period. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least 31 countries (or broader international articles) by month's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.

We hope to see you there!

Grnrchst (talk) 13:21, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]