Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Next issue/Disinformation report
 Article display preview: | This is a draft of a potential Signpost article, and should not be interpreted as a finished piece. Its content is subject to review by the editorial team and ultimately by JPxG, the editor in chief. Please do not link to this draft as it is unfinished and the URL will change upon publication. If you would like to contribute and are familiar with the requirements of a Signpost article, feel free to be bold in making improvements!
| ||||
Sex, power, and money revisited
How paid editors squeeze you dry
31 January 2024
"Wikipedia and the assault on history"
4 December 2023
The "largest con in corporate history"?
20 February 2023
Truth or consequences? A tough month for truth
31 August 2022
The oligarchs' socks
27 March 2022
The stories behind articles in The Signpost seldom end on the article’s publication date. In this reporter’s long running series about paid editors and other conflict of interest editors, court cases may drag or a new case may start. Government officials may step down and then be appointed to new positions. Expect the unexpected. This is particularly noticeable in the stories on the roughly twenty billionaires I’ve reported on; maybe less so for the politicians and government officials. This year, and especially this last month have had many unexpected events about the subjects of my reporting. Just this week a major article on an old Signpost subject was published.
Sex offenders
[edit]Convicted sex offenders are a special group. Jeffery Epstein's paid edits were extensive and shocking, but there have been few developments in his case since the Signpost article was published seven months after his death.
Ghislaine Maxwell’s apparent edits, in contrast, were few, confused, and soon deleted, except for the photo she apparently sent us. Her court case was fairly quick and her conviction was widely expected.
The Finnish-born Canadian fashion designer had a net worth of about C$900 million in 2017. By 2020 the FBI had raided his New York office, his businesses were being sold to cover his debts, and he was being sued by at least 57 women who claimed that he raped or sexually abused them, many of them when they were minors. In December 2020 he was arrested in Canada on criminal charges for extradition to the US. Later he was also charged in Toronto, Montreal, and Winnipeg for similar alleged crimes.
In December 2023, after 36 months being held without bail, the 82 year old Peter Nygard was convicted in Toronto on four charges of sex crimes in the first of his four possible criminal trials. He was finally sentenced this September to eleven years in prison, but after deducting time already served, only seven more years might need to be served - on this conviction.
Epstein, Maxwell, and Nygard are the only sex offenders I've covered. While some other people who appear to have violated Wikipedia's rules have been convicted of crimes, please remember that any of those offenses are quite different from the ones described above. And please also remember that no investigation of paid editing conducted entirely on-Wiki can definitively prove an editor's employer. The editor may just be trying to embarrass the subject of his edits.
Back to prison
[edit]
Another criminal, Greg Lindberg, was convicted in May of bribery and conspiracy to commit wire fraud and is now awaiting sentencing. He bought several insurance companies and was accused of draining $2 billion of the companies’ reserves into his own pockets or of lending the money to other companies he owned. He was indicted in 2019, found guilty of trying to bribe North Carolina’s insurance commissioner and reported to Federal prison on October 20, 2020, a month before the Signpost article about him.
The Signpost article showed that three apparent undeclared paid editors, plus one very aggressive declared paid editor had edited the article about Greg Lindberg.
His sentence for bribery was for 7 years and 3 months, and if nothing else had happened in the case, he could have been out of prison by 2028. Instead he appealed his conviction and got a retrial. This May he was convicted again on the same charges, but has not been sentenced yet. In November he pled guilty to other charges of conspiracy to defraud and money laundering, and left the court in FBI custody. The guilty plea could lead to an additional sentence of up to 15 years. Reportedly he spent $50 million on legal fees over seven years. While the ultimate damages caused by his fraud have yet to be fully assessed, one observer reports that he may be responsible for the largest insurance fraud in history.
Just this week Bloomberg reported on a non-business aspect of Lindberg’s life in How a Billionaire’s 'Baby Project' Ensnared Dozens of Women. Lindberg has a dozen children, including three with his former wife. They separated about 2019. The other nine children were born over about 5 years mostly through the use of a large network of egg donors, in vitro fertilization, and surrogate mothers. He is the only caregiving parent for eight of the nine children. The 6,000 word Bloomberg article details major surprises every few paragraphs. While there are complaints from several of the egg donors and surrogates, most or all of the "Baby Project" may have been done legally even though there are serious questions raised about the lack of regulation in the IVF industry. Other surprises are that Lindberg considers billionaires to be "a persecuted class", and that there apparently were large bachelor-style parties on his yacht Double Down documented on YouTube.
New powers
[edit]Matthew Whitaker
[edit].jpg)
Whitaker was acting US Attorney General for three months during the later part of President Trump’s first administration. The Signpost reported that he apparently created the articles Matthew Whitaker about himself and the United States Attorney for the Southern District of Iowa in 2006 while he held that position, and added his name to Iowa Hawkeyes football as a "notable player". He also worked with the fraudulent company World Patent Marketing and incorrectly claimed to have received the Academic All-America award.
He was unofficially nominated as the US Ambassador to NATO by Trump on November 20, 2024 despite his lack of foreign policy experience.
Vivek Ramaswamy
[edit].jpg)
Back in July 2022, before Ramaswamy declared his candidacy for the 2024 GOP US presidential nomination, User:Jhofferman, following Wikipedia's rules, declared that Vivek Ramaswamy paid him to edit the article about Ramaswamy. Mediaite later reported that Jhofferman whitewashed the article about Ramaswamy, removing information about his participation in The Paul & Daisy Soros Fellowships for New Americans and a Covid-19 Response Team.
The Signpost added that, against Wikipedia's rules, over a dozen sockpuppets had apparently edited the articles about Ramaswamy or his companies Roivant Sciences and Axovant Sciences without declaring their paid status.
Ramaswamy, along with Elon Musk, were nominated November 12, 2024 by President-elect Trump to lead a planned presidential advisory commission called the Department of Government Efficiency.
It's the same old song
[edit]In January the Signpost exposed the ugliest scam I've seen on Wikipedia. Several apparently connected firms with names like EliteWikiWriters and WikiModerators would solicit small businesses, entrepreneurs, artists and authors, nonprofits, churches, and others promising to write Wikipedia articles for them. After collecting a few thousand dollars the firm(s) wouldn't bother to write the articles, or just abandoned the article if they had written anything. If the customers complained, the firm(s) would blame Wikipedia and try to upsell the customers for a few thousand dollars more.
The EliteWikiWriters website was working at least through June 17 and now appears to be offline. The WikiModerators website, if it can be reached, looks like they are not doing business as usual. In November a possibly new firm, Elite Wiki Writing, posted a press release that looks like the same old scam. Checking the new firm's website, the text looks very similar to EliteWikiWriters, even if most of the graphics and the formatting are different. An online chat with one of their salespeople said that they have been in business for seven years and employ 30 Wikipedia administrators or editors. (The chat transcript is available to admins on request, as is an archive of the press release which contains a URL blacklisted on Wikipedia.)
Gautam Adani
[edit]
On January 24, 2023, Adani was one of the richest people in the world, with a net worth of about $119 billion when the bottom dropped out. Short-seller Hindenburg Research issued a report saying that his companies were conducting "one of, if not the most egregious example of corporate fraud in history". His net worth dropped by $67 billion (as of 2/15/23) by the time the Signpost was getting ready to publish the story of one of, if not the most obvious example, of paid editing on Wikipedia. An unregistered editor had made an extensive edit to the Adani Group article, leaving his name, and job title, in their edit comment "(Revisited & updated all the content, Changes by Satyam Trivedi (Corporate Communication, Adani))" as well as an IP address that was identified as coming from Adani Enterprises Limited. On top of this self-identified complete rewriting of the Adani Group article, more than 40 accounts later blocked as sockpuppets, unidentified paid editors (UPE) or checkuser blocked editors, created or rewrote nine articles related to Adani, combining their edits on the articles.
Lightning never strikes twice in the same place, does it? On November 20, 2024 Gautam Adani and seven others were indicted for securities fraud, securities fraud conspiracy and wire fraud conspiracy in the US and Adani and his nephew were also charged in a civil case by the US Securities and Exchange Commission. The alleged fraud involved lying to US investors in the US while offering to sell bonds of the company Adani Green Energy. The alleged lie was denying that the firm paid, or had promised to pay, bribes (about $265 million worth) to Indian government officials. Gautam Adani is in India and is not expected to be arrested.
A week after the indictment was announcedAFP reported that the Adani Group had lost $55 billion in market value.
Did Adani continue to manipulate Wikipedia content after the Signpost article? At the Adani Group article one aggressively pro-Adani editor, User:Sambyal was blocked for "persistent removal of content; [I] suspect this may be professional reputation management". The same editor also edited articles on several other large Indian companies. User:Maduant made nine edits including two large pro-Adani deletions and was blocked for undisclosed paid editing. A few other editors were later blocked as sockpuppets but they made few edits and it is difficult to say if they were pro-Adani.
At Adani Green Energy User:Maduant twice deleted sections about the Hindenburg report. At Adani Enterprises their seven edits were more factual, but still pro-Adani. So yes, there appears to have been an effort to continue manipulating Wikipedia content, but it is not so obvious as it was before the Signpost article.
As always, please leave any comments in the section below. If you have any tips about newsworthy people using paid editors on Wikipedia, please email me here. And have yourself a merry little Christmas.
Discuss this story