Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Discoveries/Log/2009/May
Newly discovered, May 2009
[edit]Unproposed - the template seems fine, but it has a dedicated category which is - and is likely to remain - woefully small. It may need upmerging unless it can be got to the 60-stub threshold somehow. Created by an editor who has made several (now deleted) stub types without proposing them in the past... some people seem to be slow learners. As in the past, he's also marked quite a few non stub articles as stubs (does this look like a stub?) Grutness...wha? 08:04, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- Your the first person to tell me that a stub needs to be proposed, my intentions for this stub are good and to make it easier to contribute to the related articles. Baku87 (talk) 08:45, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- I may be the first - but I told you in October 2006 and February this year (twice), as well as today. Your intentions may be good, but unless there are 60 existing stubs (not just articles, but stubs) that can use this, it shouldn't have a separate category - and whether there are 60 or not, it should still have been proposed. Grutness...wha? 11:46, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
{{USSR-film-actor-stub}}
[edit]Unproposed and upmerged, which would be fine except that anyone who could take this template would automatically be able to take a template for one of the 15 now-independent states which made up the Soviet Union. It's not usual for bio-stubs to be split by former entities; the only reason we have a {{USSR-bio-stub}} is fior people intrinsically linked with the history of the Soviet Union, e.g., people who represented the S.U. at sport internationally. I do note that we seem to have picked up unproposed types of USSR-actor-stub and USSR-film-director-stub at some point, too, which are also unnecessary, though if those are kept, there;'s automatically no need for this one (we have the -actor-stub type, which would cover this one well enough). This one also strangely linked to a permcat, which it shouldn't. Grutness...wha? 08:04, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
{{HK-hist-stub}}
[edit]Unproposed, upmerged (thankfully), misnamed. I've moved it to the naming convention-compliant {{HongKong-hist-stub}}, but sadly this creates yet another annoying HK redirect. Usage of this one seems a little odd - of the nine items marked with it, only five could really have been called history stubs. Was linked to a permcat, but wasn't linked to Category:Hong Kong stubs for some reason (both these problems fixed). Grutness...wha? 00:43, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
Unproposed & cat is missing {{Stub category}} template. User:Thomas.macmillan put an sfd on the cat in December (with edit-summ should be Indian media stubs, matching the category, eh?), but I've found no evidence that was ever proposed for discussion (and I'm not quite sure what his intent). Well-populated (163) and well-categorized - just needs properly forming & bringing into the fold? (Edit: forgot to sign again ACK apols. • Lainagier • talk • 21:39, 4 May 2009 (UTC))
- Seems reasonable - so that would mean finally taking it to WP:SFD... Grutness...wha? 21:21, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
- Wrangling over adjective/noun forms in country stub cat names is a hairier business than I care to involve myself in, but I shall put it to Mr.macmillan. • Lainagier • talk • 07:59, 7 May 2009 (UTC)