User talk:Mursel


Wikipedia ads	file info – #173

User:Neftchi	User talk:Neftchi	User:Neftchi/Sandbox	Special:Contributions/Neftchi
User	Talk	Sandbox	Contributions

Archives

1, 2, 3

Flag of Azerbaijan

I understand the law has the construction details, but if you look at it from my point of view, who knows what the laws and this technical document could be different. If you see my work on the article Flag of Japan, you will see what I mean at http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Flag_of_Japan#Design. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 20:56, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

http://e-qanun.az/files/framework/data/4/f_4908.htm and other documents like this I found, so we can use this. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 07:47, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I also fixed the SVG image of the Navy flag. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 08:01, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why do not you translate about the flag of Soviet Azerbaijan from Russian Wikipedia. There detail about this is written. Талех (talk) 15:03, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Scout, its very helpful information. I have already translated the Russian page to English. But the English page is more specific and clear. We should continue this discussion on the related page here. Neftchi (talk) 16:13, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK. I have to ask you. Article Azeris in Russian Wikipedia has a section about anthropology. This is a very important topic that needs to be translated exactly into a from Russian to English version of the article The Azerbaijanis. I do not have sufficient skills to do so. Талех (talk) 18:52, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re

The fact that he is potentially related to an account that hasn't edited since last year is irrelevant to me. The edits of his that I preserved were dishonestly reverted as "vandalism" when they were not. I'd also like to point out that the SPI is not yet closed, you are just jumping to the conclusion that you desire before it is definitively proven. ~~ Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 14:37, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

AfD

Nomination of Western Azerbaijan (political concept) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Western Azerbaijan (political concept) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Western Azerbaijan (political concept) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Takabeg (talk) 03:59, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lezgistan

"I suggest the seperation between the two, so unsourced table and Sadval related information have no place here. Neftchi (talk) 19:24, 17 September 2011 (UTC)"

Neftchi, I also think that we should split this into two articles:

Lezgistan (historical concept) or Lezgistan (geographical concept) - about the hisotorical / geographical region called Lezgistan
Lezgistan (political concept) - about the political / irrendentist movement called Lezgistan

What you think?? I think this should be acceptable. --Yerevanci (talk) 23:26, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Karintak

You are not allowed to delete good information on Wikipedia, and you should not delete text without discussion unless it is blatantly bad. This is not the case, and you are in danger of violating the three revert rule on the Dashalty/Karintak article. Continue with this behavior and I will have to report you. If you have genuine issues with the text, discuss them on the discussion page of the article. And I mean genuine issues, not personal POV issues, which you are not allowed to bring into articles. Thank you. --RaffiKojian (talk) 18:04, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are clearly not familiar with Wikipedia regulations and you shouldnt take this on me. Nor should you make any personal attacks against me. I politely responded to you in the talkpage of Dashalty article, see here. Neftchi (talk) 21:51, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am familiar with regulations. You responded only after deleting the text 3 times and ignoring my requests to address the issue on the talk page. Only after I posted here did you finally write a response. --RaffiKojian (talk) 02:37, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Armenian Highland again

Hello, Mursel. You have new messages at Talk:Armenian Highland#Original research ?.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Takabeg (talk) 09:04, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Could you follow and check User:Captain armenia as he is vandalizing articles about Azerbaijan, Nagorno-Karabakh etc. by putting POV material.

Could you follow and check User:Captain armenia as he is vandalizing articles about Azerbaijan, Nagorno-Karabakh etc. by putting POV material. His latest vandalism is in the Azerbaijan article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.99.173.167 (talk) 16:26, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ethnic cleansing

Hi Neftchi, RaffiKojian keeps removing large sections of sourced text, as you already noticed. Clearly, he's edit-warring which is grounds for a report. Tuscumbia (talk) 12:47, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Highland :(

Neftçi ! Bu kullanıcıyı ikna edemez misin ? Takabeg (talk) 08:18, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Arbcomm

You have been mentioned here as a party [1] --Khodabandeh14 (talk) 20:35, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

AgadaUrbanit

Hello, Mursel. You have new messages at AgadaUrbanit's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Could other users check User:MarshallBagramyan expropriation of the entire Kars article.

Could other users check User:MarshallBagramyan expropriation of the entire Kars article. This user constantly erases the other versions of the name of the city Kars in other languages (Armenian: Կարս Kars or Ղարս [ʁɑɾs] Ghars, Azerbaijani: Qars, Georgian: ყარსი Kars, Kurdish: Qers, Russian: Карс Kars) , and only lets the Armenian version of the name to stay (Armenian: Կարս Kars or Ղարս [ʁɑɾs] Ghars). Unfortunately this user's ethnocentric POV pushing by ignoring the history of the city, after the Armenian era, is still allowed to stay. He even defends it in the city article talk page. Could you follow the Kars article and prevent the constant nationalist POV reversals and editions of User:MarshallBagramyan. Thank you.

User:MarshallBagramyan has started again erasing the city of Kars's name in other languages apart from its Armenian name. Could all users check and revert this user's ethnocentric POV pushing by ignoring the history of the city. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.224.28.56 (talk) 19:10, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mis-representing a source

Your edit on Church of Caucasian Albania, is misrepresented, "These people were the direct ancestors of present-day Azerbaijanis, spoke a Turkic language and adopted the Shi'i brand of Islam dominant in neighboring Iran."
is incorrect.
The source states this, "These people, the direct ancestors of present-day Azerbaijanis, spoke a Turkic language and adopted the Shi'i brand of Islam dominant in neighboring Iran."
which changes the entire perspective of the sentence and does not indicate that the Caucasian Albanians were ancestors of Azerbaijanis, since Caucasian Albanians did not "speak a Turkic language". Your edit on Caucasian Albanians therefore is also incorrect. Hopefully you will correct these errors. --Kansas Bear (talk) 21:16, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I was typing the entire section over myself, so this was an honest typo. However I dont agree with your interpretation of the source. You have taken it out of context. I only used what the source mentioned. First of all the source specifically mention that the Caucasian Albanians were the direct ancestors of Azerbaijanis. This is what the source says, you may not agree, but you are not a historian nor are your interpretations a valid source. I will break the sentences down for you: These people (Caucasian Albanians), the direct ancestors of present-day Azerbaijanis,(this establishes the link between Caucasian Albanians and Azerbaijanis) spoke a Turkic language and adopted (it shows that the Caucasian Albanians were Turkified and Islamized) the Shi'i brand of Islam dominant in neighboring Iran. The mountains remained largely Christian,(it means that the Caucasian Albanians in the mountains of Karabakh remained Christian whilest lowland Caucasian Albanians were Turkified and Islamized) and in time the Karabagh Albanians (note the word Karabakh Albanians, it means Caucasian Albanians who lived in the mountains of Karabakh) merged with the Armenians.(It established a link of Armenification of Karabakh Albanians) This means that the Caucasian Albanians were the direct ancestors of Azerbaijanis but in the 11th century the lowland Caucasian Albanians adopted the Turkic language and Shi'i Islam, while the Caucasian Albanians in Karabakh remained Christian and were Armenified over time. I have not written anything out of the context, but my edits were based on a source. I hope this clears things up. Mursel (talk) 11:31, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Whole Azerbaijan

I partially reverted your edit here, as it seems to have inadvertantly added the deletion template to the article when the AFD was already closed. If you feel that the article should be deleted, or that the consensus at AFD was not to Keep the article, please discuss the matter with the closing admin, or visit WP:DRV. Thanks. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 14:03, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Advice

Hi Mursel. I have some hardships regarding sources and need your advice. Could you please explain if youtube video can be shown as a reliable source in the article? Here is the source I worry about. Thanks and Happy New Year to you beforehand :) --Verman1 (talk) 07:12, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Could all Azeri users check User:Yerevanci's relentless POV additions, lately in the Azerbaijan article.

This user constantly puts an inaccurate map about ethnic groups in Azerbaijan. Other users correctly remove it, but he puts it back. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.224.28.56 (talk) 12:12, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

POV ethnic map

OK, first the source is clearly written here. Second, after your notification, I changed the map now it does show Talysh people and the surrounding area of NK is shown as sparsely Armenian-inhabited area. Third, I think it would have been great, but the ethnic composition of Armenia is 98% Armenian and there are only 2 ethnic minorities (Yezidisi and Russians) that exceed 10,000 and there are only about 20 Yezidi-inhabited villages and that's it. If you wanna make a map with just showing one color, go ahead, do it. In my opinion, there's no need for that.--Yerevanci (talk) 20:42, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bob Menendez

Hi Mursel, I wanted to let you know that I heavily edited your POV additions to Bob Menendez. Whatever you may think of him personally, please make a greater effort to adhere to Wikipedia's NPOV policy. Arbor8 (talk) 16:39, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Could all Azeri users check User:Yerevanci's and User:Nocturnal781's relentless POV additions, lately in the Ermenikend article.

These users constantly change the correct article name of Ermenikend into the incorrect name of "Armenikend". Could all Azeri users prevent the taking over of articles about Azerbaijan by Armenian users with their biased nationalistic POV agenda. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.224.158.240 (talk) 12:02, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You for the Wikipedia Picture

Hello, My name is Duane Hurst and I recently made a free (non-commercial) English web site to share information with people. I added links to your Wikipedia/Wikimedia freeware picture (http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/File:Gobustan_ancient_Azerbaycan_full.jpg). I also gave credit to you on my web pages for your work. Thank you for sharing with the public. My website is:

http://www.freeenglishsite.com/

I add pictures such as yours to one of the following major sections of my site: 1. World section - contains information and over 10,000 images of every world country and territory. Link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/world/index.htm

2. USA section - contains information and images of every USA state and territory. Link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/world/usa/index.htm

3. English section - "Mel and Wes" lessons in conversation format. Stories are located in various USA states and world countries such as China, England, Germany, Japan, Mexico and Thailand. Each lesson has many slang terms and idioms, which I link to my Slang Dictionary. This eventually will have over 5,000 terms. Currently, it has about 3,000 slang and idioms. I regularly add new lessons and slang terms. Link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/english/lessons/index.htm Slang Dictionary link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/english/slang/Eslang_a.htm

Prior to retirement, I taught English at several private and public universities in the United States.

Please share this free site with your friends. I hope all will enjoy the pictures and find the English information useful. Sincerely, Duane Hurst in Utah, USA

Email address: duanerhurst@freeenglishsite.com --65.130.202.239 (talk) 15:08, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Deportation of Azerbaijanis from Armenia for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Deportation of Azerbaijanis from Armenia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deportation of Azerbaijanis from Armenia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JediXmaster (talk) 04:57, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Garayev Piano.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Garayev Piano.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Երևանցի ^talk 22:49, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Azerbaijan

Salam. Azərbaycan məqaləsinə yerləşdirilmiş şəkilləri niyə çıxarmaq istəyirsiz. Şəkillər kifayət qədər zövqlə seçilib və dolğun təəssürat yaratmağa kömək edir. Şəkillərisiz məqalə sanki "kasıb" görünür. Hörmətlə --Urek Meniashvili (talk) 08:38, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Azerbaycan meqalesini esas men yazmisham (sehifenin tarixne baxsan gorersen) ve "good article" statusu chox zehmetle qazandirildi. Good article meyarlarde foto albuma icaze vermirler [2]. Zeten shekilleride chetinlikle secilibler. Siz elediyin deyishiklerle - Azerbaycan sehifesi - good article statusu itirecek. Bashadushuremki istiyirsiz sehifenin keyfiyyeti yukseltmek ama xahis edirem artiq shekiller elave elemiyin. Azerbaycan barede shekiller internetde choxdur, wikipedia sehifesi foto album deyil. Chox shekil elave eliyende, meqalenin layouti ve keyfiyyetne ziyan olur. Mursel (talk) 09:20, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Azerbaijan, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Miniature painting and Celebrations (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Could all Azeri users check and prevent the incorrect name change of the article Ermenikend into the incorrect name of "Armenikend".

These users constantly change the correct article name of Ermenikend into the incorrect name of "Armenikend".

This was done unilaterally without any discussion and whithout any (widespread) agreement whatsoever.

Could all Azeri users also prevent the taking over of articles about Azerbaijan by Armenian users with their biased nationalistic POV agenda.

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.66.209.203 (talk) 19:37, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support merging the Ermenikend article with the Armenians of Baku article

Support merging the Ermenikend article with the Armenians of Baku article. The article is interwined with the former Armenian community of Baku and is not separate from it. Furthermore the false corrupted name change from Ermenikend into "Armenikend" is not the norm. Additionally the article is a WP:CONTENTFORK. Sanich^talk 15:54, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hi there, Mursel. Don't you notice that there's a lot of anti-Azeri and anti-Turkish sentiment in Wikipedia? It's pathetic, don't you think so? --Nadia (Kutsuit) (talk) 09:19, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It is pathetic and a bit sad that with an open-source platform as Wikipedia the two communities have been incapable of rapprochement. We just have to make the best of it. Mursel (talk) 09:51, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Baku, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ottoman and Gobustan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Gara Garayev work.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Gara Garayev work.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 09:54, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Gara Garayev work.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Gara Garayev work.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 16:32, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

AA2 reminder

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

Étienne Dolet (talk) 23:07, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Baku City Photo.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Baku City Photo.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:27, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits

Stop removing sourced information and adding POV edits. For the Baku Khanate, Encyclopedia Britannica states: "Persian-ruled khanates in Shirvan (Şamaxı), Baku, Ganja (Gäncä), Karabakh, and Yerevan dominated this frontier of Ṣafavid Iran." Why you are removing this is just an example of you pushing Azeri POV on articles. Persian was the official and yet you keep changing it, without sources, to claim Azeri was the primary. If you do not stop your POV edits i will report you. Ninetoyadome (talk) 20:30, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Look buddy, you gave no explanations for your reverts, so if anything, I will report you for vandalism. Anyway, in good faith, I will explain the edits in the talkpage of every article. Mursel (talk) 11:41, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Mirza Alakbar Sabir.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Mirza Alakbar Sabir.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:25, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Mosque in Baku.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Mosque in Baku.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:11, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Chingiz Mustafayev

Hi, just letting you know the above article has been prodded. (not by me) Atlantic306 (talk) 20:51, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Military Parade.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Military Parade.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 11:04, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Azebaijan - US - Turkey 2.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Azebaijan - US - Turkey 2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 09:00, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Azerbaijan Air Force.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Azerbaijan Air Force.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 09:01, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Azerbaijan Army 2.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Azerbaijan Army 2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 09:02, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Azerbaijan Army 5.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Azerbaijan Army 5.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 09:02, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Azerbaijan Army 6.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Azerbaijan Army 6.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 09:03, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Azerbaijan Army 7.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Azerbaijan Army 7.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 09:03, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Baku City Photo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Baku City Photo.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 09:20, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Baku City Photo.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Baku City Photo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 11:49, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Historic azerbaijan 2.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Historic azerbaijan 2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 13:28, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Asian 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 11:17, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Mursel. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:SV100233.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SV100233.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 04:07, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Garayev Piano.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Garayev Piano.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:40, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:WikiProject Azerbaijan logo.png

The file File:WikiProject Azerbaijan logo.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 07:46, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Donor Blood Ceremony

The article Donor Blood Ceremony has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DannyS712 (talk) 06:59, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Azerbaijan Unit Crest.png

The file File:Azerbaijan Unit Crest.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Azerbaijan2006.png

The file File:Azerbaijan2006.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Neftchi.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Neftchi.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Azeri barnstar.png

The file File:Azeri barnstar.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:SV100013.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SV100013.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 15:48, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Azerbaijan Template.gif

The file File:Azerbaijan Template.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Azerbaijan.png

The file File:Azerbaijan.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Nesimi.png

The file File:Nesimi.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Gobustan ancient Azerbaycan.jpg

The file File:Gobustan ancient Azerbaycan.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Military Parade 5.jpg

The file File:Military Parade 5.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

File:Military Parade 6.jpg

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Azerbaijan Voluntary Military Patriotism Technical Sport Society for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Azerbaijan Voluntary Military Patriotism Technical Sport Society is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Azerbaijan Voluntary Military Patriotism Technical Sport Society until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

NMW03 (talk) 20:03, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mugham Festival

A tag has been placed on Mugham Festival requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organized event (tour, function, meeting, party, etc.) that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. - Kevo³²⁷ (talk) 19:36, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:MNS emblem.jpg

The file File:MNS emblem.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 07:56, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]