Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2024 May 31

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< May 30 << Apr | May | Jun >> June 1 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


May 31

[edit]

02:20, 31 May 2024 review of submission by KImMoro

[edit]

Good day, I tried creating a page for Photographer Karl-Edwin Guerre, however it stated that the content may not meet the guidelines. Can you let me know what needs to be changed as there are references online to the subject. Thank you. Kim KImMoro (talk) 02:20, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@KImMoro the draft was deleted under G11, which means it was blatant promotion. I am not an administrator and therefore cannot see the draft, but a quick Google search found almost no useable sources. Please read our notability guidelines for photographers and other creative professionals. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talkcontribs) 06:24, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

06:41, 31 May 2024 review of submission by Ananthua9560b

[edit]

Please help me complete the draft and make it suitable for wikipedia Ananthua9560b (talk) 06:41, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ananthua9560b: see WP:REFB for advice on referencing, and WP:ORG on notability. Your draft lists (without citing) two sources, the first of which is completely useless, the other insufficient to verify the draft contents or to establish notability of the subject. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:09, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
PS: Why are we suddenly seeing all these drafts on Indian military units? Is there some sort of coordinated effort to create these? If so, can you tell us who is coordinating this, please? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:10, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

06:56, 31 May 2024 review of submission by Amar Nath Sehgal

[edit]

I do not know how to add references. Most of the information in the article is from personal interview and discussions from the museum owner. So I do not know how to reference it. Amar Nath Sehgal (talk) 06:56, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Blocked indef) -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:07, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

07:19, 31 May 2024 review of submission by Jessie GYU8

[edit]

Hello, I'm Jessie GYU8, the creator of this draft. I left this message because there are some problems.

First, I found out that I can't submit the draft again, and the reason is I did not change my draft's content. I'm sorry for that, but I tried my best to avoid sentences that are "peacock", and also tried to verify that this draft is available to be included by Wikipedia.

Second, if there is any way that I can submit the draft, please let me know. I pay a lot of attention to this draft.

Please guide me to solve these problems. I would be so appreciative of that. Jessie GYU8 (talk) 07:19, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jessie GYU8: just to be clear, I didn't reject this draft because you hadn't made changes. I rejected it because, even after multiple previous declines, there was no evidence at all that the subject is notable, and given that no further evidence was offered since the previous submission, I could only conclude that none was available. For that reason it would also be pointless to resubmit this, as it stands; it would only have to be declined again. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:48, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your reply.
If I can find more evidence to certify that it's notable, do I have a chance to submit this draft? Jessie GYU8 (talk) 07:59, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Jessie GYU8: if you have evidence that wasn't made available earlier, you can add that to the draft, and let me know, I will then take a look. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:24, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your reply.
Does this mean I can add the evidence to my draft and don't need to submit it again because you can read it? Should I just leave a message on your user page?
This message is very helpful. I will try my best to make the draft notable. Sincerely, thank you for your reply. Jessie GYU8 (talk) 08:33, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Jessie GYU8: yes, technically speaking you can still edit the draft, you just can't submit it again. And adding the evidence of notability there is much easier for anyone to assess, than if you come eg. here with it, because that way it can be seen in context.
Appeals against rejection are made directly to the rejecting reviewer, in this case me. So yes, you can come by my talk page to let me know whenever you're done with editing. Only do that, though, when you have a solid case, as I will only review this one more time. You are paid to edit this, not me, and I will not be dragged into co-editing or iterating with you.
Also, be aware that none of the four sources you currently have contribute anything towards notability, so you have quite a lot of work to do, going from zero to unequivocal notability. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:59, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much for your reminder, it really helps me a lot.
I will leave a message to let you review the draft until it has notability.
And here is the last question: if there are other troubles, such as the draft still having problems that need to be solved, do I still have a chance to edit the draft and it will be transferred to another reviewer, or is this the last chance?
Sincerely thanks for your reply. Jessie GYU8 (talk) 02:07, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

08:12, 31 May 2024 review of submission by ItsVishalBawa

[edit]

Hi Team Please help me to Realise this article ItsVishalBawa (talk) 08:12, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ItsVishalBawa You have submitted it for review and it is pending. It is unlikely to be accepted, as you only have a single source. An article must summarize what multiple independent reliable sources with significant coverage choose on their own to say about the subject, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of notability- in your case, a notable musician.
It appears you are writing about yourself- Wikipedia is not a place for people to tell the world about themselves. Please read the autobiography policy. 331dot (talk) 08:18, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
How can i change my user name. 122.163.173.233 (talk) 14:37, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you log in and then tell me on your user page(User talk:ItsVishalBawa) what new username you want, I can change it for you. 331dot (talk) 14:42, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@ItsVishalBawa: can't do that, but I will go and decline it.
Your user name has been queried many times. Are you the Vishal Bawa that you're writing about? If you are, please read and understand WP:AUTOBIO.
Or if you're not (as you seem to be suggesting on your talk page, if I've deciphered it correctly), then you must change your username, as it is misleading. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:18, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, it seems my learned friend Theroadislong got there first. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:19, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

09:54, 31 May 2024 review of submission by Rihanshariar12

[edit]

Why am i doing this Rihanshariar12 (talk) 09:54, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Rihanshariar12 that isn't really a question we can answer, but your draft was tagged for deletion under G11, meaning that it is blatant promotion. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talkcontribs) 09:57, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I pubbilshed this page but it failed Rihanshariar12 (talk) 10:00, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I mean pubilshed this page but failed Rihanshariar12 (talk) 10:01, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
because it was draft Rihanshariar12 (talk) 10:02, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not the place for you to tell the world about yourself. You should use social media to do that. 331dot (talk) 10:26, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. You submitted the draft for review, and it was rejected by a reviewer. Please see WP:AUTO and Help:Your first article. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talkcontribs) 10:01, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

13:00, 31 May 2024 review of submission by Shelby Beaven

[edit]

I’m very sorry for any inconvenience, I’m new here and I thought I could write an article about myself. Is there any way I could publish it or get any one to write it for me? Again I am very sorry for misunderstanding, thank you Shelby Beaven (talk) 13:00, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Shelby Beaven. Your draft was declined multiple times, but you kept re-submitting with no changes. Now since I have rejected the draft you will not be able to submit it again. You are not notable by our standards and do not merit an article, and you really should not be writing about yourself anyway.
Let me know if you have any questions, Qcne (talk) 13:09, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

15:00, 31 May 2024 review of submission by ItsJustGiraffe13

[edit]

Someone please help add some more cites and add more information! ItsJustGiraffe13 (talk) 15:00, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. It's up to you to have sources in hand before you begin the process of writing a draft, not write the draft first and then look for sources to support it- see WP:BACKWARD. 331dot (talk) 15:03, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I understand, but I just want to say, it was already rejected for that before I started working on it. I just want to make things right in hopes for it to be published in the future. 😅 Thanks for the help though! I will see what I can do! ItsJustGiraffe13 (talk) 15:07, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you can fundamentally change the draft to address the reasons for rejection, you may ask the rejecting reviewer to reconsider. 331dot (talk) 15:10, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, Thanks! ItsJustGiraffe13 (talk) 15:12, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
FWIW, I've seen this covered extensively in Finnish mainstream media this week, so shouldn't be too difficult to establish WP:GNG notability, now that the game is actually out. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:16, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

20:01, 31 May 2024 review of submission by Ah507

[edit]

I've added more sources from notable news outlets about the subject, do see if it still qualifies under WP:N. Thanks! Ah507 (talk) 20:01, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ah507 It was rejected. So I doubt it will proceed further 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 22:45, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Ah507 Your sole edit to this draft was this one, made on 23 October 2023. Please explain "I've added more sources from notable news outlets about the subject"? 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 22:49, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]