Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2024 December 14

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< December 13 << Nov | December | Jan >> December 15 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


December 14

[edit]

05:13, 14 December 2024 review of submission by Skronk monster13

[edit]

i would like to change the article name to “StuGo” instead of “Stugo” but i can’t figure out how. Skronk monster13 (talk) 05:13, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Skronk monster13 the title doesn't really matter, as the reviewer will pick a suitable one if the draft is accepted. Also, there is already a Draft:StuGo with more content. Perhaps you'd like to work on that? '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 05:34, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
i didn’t realize there was already a draft for the show. thank you! Skronk monster13 (talk) 16:42, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

14:11, 14 December 2024 review of submission by 2.138.115.80

[edit]

I recently submitted a draft for a Wikipedia page and am seeking your help to ensure it meets the community's standards and guidelines for approval.

I want to make sure the content is accurate, neutral, and well-cited, but I may need a clearer understanding of what specific adjustments are required to make it suitable for publication. Could you kindly review my submission and provide feedback on:

Whether the content sufficiently demonstrates notability through reliable, independent sources. If there are areas where I might unintentionally include promotional language or lack neutrality. Any additional suggestions for improvement in formatting or tone to better align with Wikipedia’s standards. Your guidance would be greatly appreciated, and I am more than willing to make the necessary revisions.

Thank you for your time and assistance! 2.138.115.80 (talk) 14:11, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Submitting for review is the way to get reviewed. But in my opinion, this promotional piece has been written BACKWARDS, as usually happens when a new editor attempts to create an article without having spent time learning how Wikipedia works.
Wikipedia is not interested in what Van Rongen says or wants to say, or what his employers or associates say. It is (almost) only interested in what people wholly unconnected with him have chosen to publish about him, in reliable places.
  • First, find severaal sources which meet all three of the criteria in WP:42.
  • Then, assuming you can find at least three such, forget everything you know about van Rongen, and write a summary of what those sources say.
By the way, please remember to log in: I assume that you are @Voice007.? ColinFine (talk) 15:56, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

15:06, 14 December 2024 review of submission by HKLionel

[edit]

A previous draft by a now inactive user was deleted. Is there a way I can view and use the contents of that draft for my current draft without requesting undeletion, which is impossible since the draft already exists (after I created it)? Thanks. HKLionel (talk) 15:06, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@HKLionel: I was going to say that I can restore the deleted draft for you, but I've just looked at it and there is so little content in it (two short paragraphs of pretty pointless blurb, if I'm honest) and no sources, so it's not really worth it. I'd say proceed with your draft, it's already much more advanced in every respect. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:12, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Noted with thanks! HKLionel (talk) 15:14, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

15:54, 14 December 2024 review of submission by Trishanthreddy

[edit]

Why my page is getting declined, please help me and. Tell how to improve this, I am an 14 years child, and this is my first attempt please please and I am from India, explain me clearly how to do this and what changes and where I have to do the changes. Please Trishanthreddy (talk) 15:54, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A Wikipedia article must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the topic, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of notability, such as a notable organization. Your draft is completely unsourced. Writing a new article is the most difficult task to perform on Wikipedia, and it is recommended that you first gain experience by editing existing articles, as well as use the new user tutorial. I'd also suggest that you read this page with a parent or guardian or custodian. 331dot (talk) 15:59, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Trishanthreddy: every one of the decline notices (remember, the ones you deleted?) gives details of the decline reasons; I also added comment to point to the notability guideline you needed to comply with (but you deleted that, as well). So once more: your draft is completely unreferenced, and therefore presents no evidence that the subject is notable. And given that the vast majority of schools are in fact not notable, it is virtually a given that this subject can not be included in the encyclopaedia. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:59, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]


You have tell what i need to do, but it was not done, why why are doing like that, please explain simply me what I have to do and I am an indian Trishanthreddy (talk) 17:28, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't start a new thread with every post, just add to this existing section. What we are saying is there is nothing you can do. You keep emphasizing you're Indian for some reason- whether you're Indian or Russian or South African is not relevant. Please reread my earlier post and follow the advice. 331dot (talk) 17:42, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

18:07, 14 December 2024 review of submission by Felixjordanbind

[edit]

Why was this declined? 

Felixjordanbind (talk) 18:07, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Felixjordanbind: Almost all of your sources are merely listings or content-free profiles, none of which would be a viable source (too sparse). https://www.clydeco.com/en/people/d/nadia-darwazeh?section=profile is written by her employer (connexion to subject) and https://www.breakingthrough.de/portraet-nadia-darwazeh is an interview (connexion to subject). This draft falls under the auspices of the general sanctions in the Arab-Israeli conflict contentious topic, and you have not met the 500 edit+30-day threshold. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 19:19, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

19:34, 14 December 2024 review of submission by Kamalı Zeybek

[edit]

Please Submit Ok Kamalı Zeybek (talk) 19:34, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kamalı Zeybek: We do not accept unsourced, content-free "articles". —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 19:35, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

20:06, 14 December 2024 review of submission by WitchYouAllShallLove

[edit]

I have re wroten this article and put refrences i need someone to EXACLY tell me whats wrong with it NOW. im super confused 

WitchYouAllShallLove (talk) 20:06, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
WitchYouAllShallLove, your unreferenced draft violates the Neutral point of view because it pushes a pro-witchcraft point of view. It fails Verifiability and violates the No original research policy. It bears no resemblance to an acceptable Wikipedia article. It has been rejected and will not be considered further. Cullen328 (talk) 20:14, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please read What Wikipedia is not. ColinFine (talk) 21:06, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Samsung A04

[edit]

Hello, please, please accept it, I won't do it again. Why are you doing this? I swear, don't do this. Accept it, I won't do it again. Kamalı Zeybek (talk) 20:17, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kamalı Zeybek: Your repeated pleas to accept a draft that is not ready for main space is disruptive. You have been advised what needs to be done on Hammersoft’s talk page to fix the draft so it can be accepted. Until that happens, nothing will be done. cyberdog958Talk 20:27, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

20:35, 14 December 2024 review of submission by StarDate108

[edit]

Hi, my submission was declined because it was improperly sourced. The thing is that it is a translation from these Japanese articles: https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E9%96%A2%E5%B1%B1%E3%83%88%E3%83%B3%E3%83%8D%E3%83%AB https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E9%96%A2%E5%B1%B1%E5%B3%A0 I selected sources from them that seemed relevant. Unfortunately I don't have access to any other sources than these. Is it possible to get the article approved anyway? I understand that in general it is not an excuse that the sources on the original pages are subpar, but in this case I belive that they still are satisfactory. StarDate108 (talk) 20:35, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@StarDate108 Put simply, no. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 20:59, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@StarDate108 When you translate articles, or parts thereof, please use {{TRanslated page}}. I have done this for you here on the talk page.
Now you have had time to digest the simple message ^^^^, please seek further references for the draft 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 21:07, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

22:06, 14 December 2024 review of submission by Swmpz

[edit]

The draft got rejected for notoriety, could I get some clarification on what specific grounds, and what my next steps would be? Swmpz (talk) 22:06, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's "notability", not "notoriety"(which has a more negative connotation). As told by reviewers, you have not shown that your game is notable. Rejection typically is the end of the line for a draft, but if you can fundamentally change the draft to address the concerns of reviewers, you must first appeal to the last reviewer. 331dot (talk) 22:32, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

22:33, 14 December 2024 review of submission by Jag612red

[edit]

I want someone to review my article. Jag612red (talk) 22:33, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jag612red, you have to wait for a review just like everyone else. Why do you think that a separate article is needed when we already have Greensboro Complex? Cullen328 (talk) 22:39, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I just decided to make something that stays on the topic of the coliseum Jag612red (talk) 22:43, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2024_December_14&oldid=1264711977"