Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2023 April 28

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< April 27 << Mar | April | May >> April 29 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


April 28

[edit]

01:47, 28 April 2023 review of submission by Brownbellcaps

[edit]

I'm not sure how to fix this error: Cite error: The named reference :0 was invoked but never defined Is this about a problem with a particular citation. Brownbellcaps (talk) 01:47, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's been fixed! -- asilvering (talk) 04:27, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

03:17, 28 April 2023 review of submission by MykolaPro112

[edit]

I was curious why my article was declined and what could I do to make it better and accepted later. MykolaPro112 (talk) 03:17, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the links in the decline message. -- asilvering (talk) 04:28, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

05:48:32, 28 April 2023 review of draft by 119.73.117.196

[edit]


Hello I need help in editing my article. I just need a minor help thanks. Link to my article: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Draft:Raimond_Magomedaliev

119.73.117.196 (talk) 05:48, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You'll need to be more specific, "minor help" doesn't tell us much.
In any case, this draft has been submitted and is awaiting review. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:54, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Wait you can only get help if you don't submit the article? Apologies, I'm new to wikipedia. So I don't know the rules. Anyways could you kindly look at my article, if it isn't much trouble to you??? I just need constructive comments on where I could improve the article. 119.73.117.196 (talk) 06:00, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No, you can get help at any time. But you're effectively asking us to review your article. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:50, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
And, since the article has been "submitted", it will be reviewed, in due time. As DG says, the hosts here won't do a "pre-review" while the actual review is pending. It can be confusing until you get used to how things are done here... David10244 (talk) 07:57, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

07:38, 28 April 2023 review of submission by Rowbarton

[edit]

Hi I am trying to submit my final edit for DoubleGrazing. I am hopeless at this. I went to 'edit' as instructed, then deleted my declined page needing amendments. pasted my new submission, showed preview, explained edit, then published but there is no submit link. Please help. I have told DG it is coming but now unable to fulfil. I am 94 so not tech minded but still have most marbles I think!!. Patrick (Rowbarton) The Fourteen of Meaux Rowbarton (talk) 07:38, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Rowbarton: Wikipedia formatting can indeed be a bit confusing, and I can only hope to be as capable as you are at the age of 94, of using whatever technology will be used in the 2060s! The references should be added in templates with curly brackets, but fear not – I'll be happy to tinker a bit with that later today, unless someone else beats me to it.
Would it be possible to add an introductory sentence or two, to summarise what the topic of the draft it?
Once you feel ready to submit it for review again, click the blue "Resubmit" button in the pink box at the top of the draft page. Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 08:25, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That is so kind of you Bonadea. DoubleGrazing is also looking into it and I do appreciate this help after weeks of research and frustration, at times close to giving up. I have , as you suggested, added two paragraphs at the start to lead into the subject and give clarity and I can see exactly why this was necessary. I published this just last evening. My problem is this. I have just, this minute, opened as always to this last 'in progress' edit page shown (but which is never the one I saved last!) on site which does have a RESUBMIT button but tells you to click 'edit' which takes you to another page. I did this and pasted from my word pad my revised and latest submission which is my best shot so far. I then 'Published' to save but there is no 'RE-SUBMIT" button I can see on that edit page so I selected the 'go back' arrow and am told I may lose my edits if I do. And I do - since next time around the original unedited text is still there preventing me sending my revised one!! I'm sure it's my fault but I don't think of myself as a thicko' and with everyone's kind support I am sure I will get my effort to you for appraisal eventually and, as I told DoubleGlazing I can stop sobbing and my Huguenot wife will stop beating me for my tantrums!! Thanks again. Very kind of you.. Patrick (Rowbarton) "The Fourteen of Meaux". Rowbarton (talk) 01:35, 29 April 2023 (UTC) Rowbarton (talk) 01:53, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

07:49, 28 April 2023 review of submission by AtasProBaby

[edit]

Could you please specify what edits should made in order for the article to be processed further? AtasProBaby (talk) 07:49, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't ask essentially the same question multiple times. Thanks, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:55, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

07:53, 28 April 2023 review of submission by AtasProBaby

[edit]

Could you please specify guys wy the article was rejected for further processing? AtasProBaby (talk) 07:53, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@AtasProBaby: are you looking for a reason other than that it's pretty much incomprehensible, completely unreferenced, and with no evidence of anything even approaching notability? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:55, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

08:20, 28 April 2023 review of submission by Boaz.levin

[edit]

After it was rejected several times, I revised this entry and hope it now maintains Wikipedia's editorial standards. Kevin B. Lee is an important critic and filmmaker, currently the Locarno Festival professor of the future of Cinema at Università della Svizzera italiana, whose work and reputation without a doubt merit an entry. I would hope you would assist in ensuring this entry meets Wikipedia's standards and can finally be published. Boaz.levin (talk) 08:20, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Boaz.levin: this draft has been rejected and won't therefore be considered further. If you have new sources which weren't taken into account in the latest review and wish to appeal the rejection, you need to do that with the rejecting reviewer directly. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:45, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

10:46, 28 April 2023 review of submission by QalasQalas

[edit]

i updated part of reliable resource, i tried my best if you better you can help me QalasQalas (talk) 10:46, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@QalasQalas: the draft has been resubmitted and is awaiting review; do you have a question you wish to ask? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:43, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

12:35:36, 28 April 2023 review of draft by Genxyourself

[edit]


I am making changes because he is my son and I don’t know how to add the changes. Here are the references:

https://www.bradenton.com/news/local/article274797491.html

https://www.yahoo.com/news/bradenton-19-old-sprint-car-210846863.html

https://nascar.nbcsports.com/2023/04/26/alex-bowman-fractures-vertebra-in-sprint-car-crash-out-3-4-weeks/

https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/motorsports/nascar-driver-out-for-significant-time-with-horrible-injury/ar-AA1arLsB


Genxyourself (talk) 12:35, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Genxyourself: seems that you already figured out how to add those sources, so I'll assume you're okay now.
However, given what you say about your relationship with Morrell, you need to formally disclose your conflict of interest (COI); I've posted a message on your talk page with instructions on how to do that. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:19, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ok thank you for your help, I’ve never done this before Genxyourself (talk) 13:24, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]