Help desk
< February 18	<< Jan \| February \| Mar >>	February 20 >

Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.

February 19

00:22:51, 19 February 2022 review of submission by Lexii60

Lexii60 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Clappa Don (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Am requesting a review on this article I created Because this person I am writing about is very notable and I believe this article should be approvedLexii60 (talk) 00:22, 19 February 2022 (UTC) Lexii60 (talk) 00:22, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

With all due respect, your sources to a one are non-sequiturs. You haven't shown he is notable per Wikipedia's definition because he's not even so much as mentioned in the lot of them. —A little blue Bori v^_^v ^{Jéské Couriano} 00:37, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand what you all talking about, But What I can say is this person is very notable, He may have less mentions on the Internet/ Google searches but outside the internet he is very very notable to the public on an Social media he is verified.So What can I do more to convince you people to approve this article because am very frustrated now.Lexii60 (talk) 00:50, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lexii60 (talk) 00:50, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia has a specific definition of notability, which can be summarised as "Has this person received significant coverage in outlets with strong editorial oversight that wasn't written by him or someone else on his behalf?" Social media does not count. We accept citations to printed books/magazines/newspapers, but absolutely none of your sources are to such media. Your sources, as it stands, don't even help prove that he is notable because literally none of them so much as mention him, let alone actually discuss him in any depth. —A little blue Bori v^_^v ^{Jéské Couriano} 01:03, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Here is one of the evidence https://g.co/kgs/2ksxSZ And Yes this person is a very talk about person and many journalist has write about him I dont know why some of his talk about article not showing up on google so I can give you evidence but it's there. But has I said he is very known to the public https://g.co/kgs/2ksxSZ Lexii60 (talk) 02:08, 19 February 2022 (UTC) Lexii60 (talk) 02:08, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's just a search results page. Please read the the replies above (and follow the links to policies and guidelines). --bonadea contributions talk 08:29, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

07:10:10, 19 February 2022 review of submission by Agorushin

Agorushin (talk · contribs)

Agorushin (talk) 07:10, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Agorushin: You do not ask a question but I recommend reading the notability guidelines for companies. S0091 (talk) 22:01, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

08:01:07, 19 February 2022 review of submission by Irishsabumani

Irishsabumani (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Sabu Mani (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Irishsabumani (talk) 08:01, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is my own profile. It doesn’t intend to promote, advertising or any misleading information is given. Please ask for any documentation if you believe is jot true. Kind regards. Sabu Mani

Wikipedia does not have profiles, Wikipedia has articles (profile is a social media term, but We are not social media). Autobiographys, while not forbidden, are strongely disocuraged, and there are reasons why a Wikipedia article might not nessesarely be desireable. Victor Schmidt (talk) 09:12, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

15:49:42, 19 February 2022 review of submission by Pepperlyl

Pepperlyl (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Alshival (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Pepperlyl (talk) 15:49, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is interesting that you ask about Draft:Alshival, which was created by User:LWSHASE and has not been edited by you, and not about Draft:DR. AGIRIYE MONIMA HARRY, ~~created by yourself~~ which is the only page you have edited. Both these drafts are adverts for people who do not meet Wikipedia's notability criteria. --bonadea contributions talk 17:14, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Turns out Draft:DR. AGIRIYE MONIMA HARRY was created by User:Scicili, who also has no edits apart from that draft. --bonadea contributions talk 17:19, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 21:57:03, 19 February 2022 for assistance on AfC submission by Joaquin89uy

Joaquin89uy (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Third World Network (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi. I'm creating a draft on a NGO called Thirld World Network.

I consider the Org. to be relevant and important. To prove so, I added a specific reference to an Indian Newspaper in my article, this being India's The Economic Times. This Newspaper featured a list, which contained all its mentions of the NGO throughout the years. There are dozens upon dozens of these in there. This is explained by the fact that Third World Network is a very active global NGO, which was created back in the mid-80's. On the other hand, the aforementioned newspaper is also very famous and esteemed in India, of its own accord. I chose a list instead of any specific news article because I found it a more clear depiction of the amount of attention the NGO has got over the decades.

Apart from this, to support the existence and basic historical facts of the NGO, I cited three other NGO's websites, which contain a specific article about the existence and basic historical facts of the aforementioned NGO. There are many more NGO's' websites with articles about TWN on the web, of course.

All these things considered, the article has been nevertheless rejected again today. As a solution, I thought I could cite specific mentions of the NGO in the aforementioned Newspaper or in other newspapers from around the world, or maybe another list of these, as I already did once. Citations risk getting bulky though.

Also, should I delete the other NGO's articles on this NGO's background? I might be left with no such background reference. Or I could search for it in news articles. It may be hard, though, as articles are mostly focused on what articles are focused on, a.k.a. the topic at hand, and not necessarily historical backgrounds of things. But I might be wrong on that.

PS: The article itself is only a stub.

Thanks for reading. - Joaquin89uy (talk) 21:57, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Joaquin89uy (talk) 21:57, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Joaquin89uy: the issues with your sources is none of them provide significant coverage, they only prove the organization exists. What you need to do is find sources which discuss the subject in greater detail on their own accord and not connected to the subject. Then you need to base the draft off these sources. If you cannot find these sources then the organization probably isn't notable enough for inclusion. Please see WP:NCORP, WP:RS and WP:SIGCOV. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 22:33, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

22:19:40, 19 February 2022 review of submission by Lexii60

Lexii60 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Clappa Don (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Okay then, So what can I do more to make this article to be approved, Because I'm unable to find more resources to proof to you guys that this person is very notable to the public. And the last thing before I go is this person is an Animator and an Artist he also has he's website about them.Lexii60 (talk) 22:19, 19 February 2022 (UTC) Lexii60 (talk) 22:19, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lexii60. The draft will not be accepted for publication because the subject does not meet Wikipedia's notability (inclusion) guidelines. There is nothing you can do about that, no amount of editing will fix it. You may wish to consider alternative outlets, with different inclusion criteria, for what you've written. --Worldbruce (talk) 23:23, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]