Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2022 February 18

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< February 17 << Jan | February | Mar >> February 19 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


February 18

[edit]

14:50:52, 18 February 2022 review of draft by GJAHANA

[edit]


GJAHANA (talk) 14:50, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please anyone help me to publish my article about SHoxrux Hamdamov 

GJAHANA (talk)

GJAHANA Please review the messages left by reviewers, and the policies and other information that they link to. 331dot (talk) 17:01, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

16:40:34, 18 February 2022 review of draft by Al4He6

[edit]


First I submitted a page and was told it would be up to 4 months for it to be reviewed, but then it got deleted because it hadn't been updated. Next a request for re-instatement was rejected because the wikipedia article was similar to an article I had subsequently written on another website. Then my submission was rejected because of a lack of independent verifiable sources (my article is about a programming tool that has existed for years, and has over a million users) At other times articles have been rejected because the reviewer believed it was a commercial enterprise (it is actually a not for profile organisation).

Al4He6 (talk) 16:40, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Al4He6 Your draft does little more than tell of the existence of this tool, and links to its official website, social media, and other associated websites. That is not what Wikipedia articles do. A Wikipedia article must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the topic, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of notability. Please read Your First Article and if you have not already, use the new user tutorial. 331dot (talk) 17:00, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

16:52:43, 18 February 2022 review of submission by Saher AlSous

[edit]

is it okey to be accepted? is it possible to review it? Saher AlSous (talk) 16:52, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Saher AlSous As noted on your draft, "This may take 3 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 3,091 pending submissions waiting for review." Reviews are conducted by volunteers in no particular order, doing what they can when they can. Please be patient. 331dot (talk) 16:57, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

19:09:28, 18 February 2022 review of draft by RebelRauser

[edit]


You keep rejecting my draft due to "unreliable sources" - my biography is about Mary Susan James Barr, the surviving daughter of Jesse James, the outlaw. The sources I am providing are from the Jesse James Museum! Please explain to me why a museum is not a reliable source. The other sources is findagrave.com, maintained by Leo James, a descendant of Jesse James. https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Draft:Mary_Susan_James


RebelRauser (talk) 19:09, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RebelRauser Findagrave is not a reliable source as it is user-editable. The museum is not an independent source. There must be significant coverage of her in independent reliable sources. 331dot (talk) 19:26, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]