Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 February 13

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< February 12 << Jan | February | Mar >> February 14 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


February 13

[edit]

00:58:05, 13 February 2021 review of submission by Generaltipsng

[edit]

kindly take a review again for the name hoganhost is a notable company in calabar , if the is any error point it out accordingly Draft:Hogan_host Generaltipsng (talk) 00:58, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Generaltipsng The draft has been rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. 331dot (talk) 01:13, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

08:09:21, 13 February 2021 review of submission by 103.47.34.20

[edit]


103.47.34.20 (talk) 08:09, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


08:40:50, 13 February 2021 review of submission by Aliasghar ghorbandokht

[edit]


Aliasghar ghorbandokht (talk) 08:40, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


10:19:31, 13 February 2021 review of submission by Laurenzbagui

[edit]


Laurenzbagui (talk) 10:19, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Laurenzbagui You don't ask a question, but Wikipedia is not social media for people to tell about themselves; this is a project to write an encyclopedia. You may use your user page, User:Laurenzbagui to tell about yourself as a Wikipedia editor or user, see this page for information on acceptable user page content. I would also urge you to review guidance for younger editors. 331dot (talk) 10:22, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

13:01:33, 13 February 2021 review of submission by Ringsidemd1961

[edit]


I have made all the corrections, additions and edits requested. I also removed all the copyrighted material. In addition, the draft was also just edited again by a reviewer and additional changes were made. I hope it is ready for publications, but if not, can you please tell me what other changes need to be made prior to the draft being eligible for a permanent article? Thank you for your time. https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Draft:Harold_Lloyd_Schwartz&oldid=1002084799

Ringsidemd1961 (talk) 13:01, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

13:24:20, 13 February 2021 review of submission by Jayjay2020

[edit]


Can someone check if the draft is ready for article space? I have added some edits and sources there. I think someone will respond here. Thank you. Jayjay2020 (talk) 13:24, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jayjay2020, I have not made a formal review, but I have left a comment on your draft which I hope will help you. Fiddle Faddle 17:00, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Timtrent, Thank you and I appreciate it. Jayjay2020 (talk) 23:46, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

16:36:07, 13 February 2021 review of draft by 100Choptanks

[edit]


Thank you for the reminder! I am confused about how to cite references within the body of the piece. It's my unfamiliarity with the coding/process that's holding up publication. The sources are solid, mostly NYTimes articles! It's ironic I was contacted yesterday about this, because Feb 12 would have been T. Edward Hambleton's 110th birthday.

100Choptanks (talk) 16:36, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

100Choptanks, It can be a little arcane, but you have been pointed at WP:REFB in a comment on the draft. No-one minds a little handholding, but we will teach you to fish rather than hand you a fish.
Have a serious read and come back with questions, please. Fiddle Faddle 16:49, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@100Choptanks: At the very least, at the end of a specific claim or sentence, slap a URL between ref tags: Smith was born on 10 October 1980<ref>http://www.sample1.com</ref> in Smythville, England.<ref>http://www.sample2.com</ref> Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:33, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

19:21:53, 13 February 2021 review of draft by General electric p30ch

[edit]


Why don't submit my article draft to Wikipedia article;

General electric p30ch (talk) 19:26, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--General electric p30ch (talk) 19:26, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@General electric p30ch: Please read the explanations in the large pink boxes at the top of the draft, as well as the comment(s) underneath it. If you have any other specific questions, feel free to ask them here. Please only post once, not multiple times like you did here, here and here. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:43, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

19:33:50, 13 February 2021 review of draft by Troy26Castillo

[edit]


Troy26Castillo (talk) 19:33, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello I need assistance on the article I am making. First, I am new when it comes to Wikipedia, and its very sad that every time I submit the article it always turned out wrong or something missing.

I understand the reasons of the admins and being patient to meet all the requirements, hopefully.

Please help me on this. Thank you.

@Troy26Castillo: Out of curiosity, have you read the various comments left by the various editors at the top of the article? They've pointed out numerous issues with the article, like the fact that you're pointing to MYX and iTunes, yet that content still remains. If someone says iTunes isn't a valid chart, don't you think you should delete that content? They've also mentioned our notability criteria for songs several times and pointed out that you need to demonstrate that the article meets those requirements. If people are actively giving you advice, I'm unclear on what you're confused about. Can you be more specific? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:41, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okey, noted, by the way i remove already the one about Itunes. Thank you by the way. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Troy26Castillo (talkcontribs) 19:49, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding with MYX, i removed it already, but why is the charts not a reliable source? it is on a daily and weekly basis charts in the Philippines. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Troy26Castillo (talkcontribs) 20:00, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Troy26Castillo: If you look at this version of the article, AngusWOOF explained that you should look at WP:BADCHARTS. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:36, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the help and i understand now. I am grateful and oevrwhelmed. Thank you so much — Preceding unsigned comment added by Troy26Castillo (talkcontribs) 04:37, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

21:28:18, 13 February 2021 review of submission by Affanakaffu

[edit]


Affanakaffu (talk) 21:28, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Affanakaffu, Wikipedia is not social media. Please create your reputation elsewhere Fiddle Faddle 21:30, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

23:43:36, 13 February 2021 review of submission by JennilyW

[edit]

My draft, Sign of the Sun was declined because it didn't have any sources. Funny thing is, I took the source from the Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Requests, and it was in March 2017, so I don't get why it was declined. JennilyW (talk) 23:43, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JennilyW. By having Draft:Sign of the Sun deleted, you've made it difficult to offer advice about it. A few general points about lists of requested articles:
The sources listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Requests included a single independent one, so if you didn't find a couple more, that may be why it was declined. Hope that helps. --Worldbruce (talk) 16:46, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]