Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2020 February 5

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< February 4 << Jan | February | Mar >> February 6 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


February 5

[edit]

02:37:54, 5 February 2020 review of draft by 68.103.78.155

[edit]
I Created This Article 2 Weeks Ago and it need's to be in article space soon Because it has one reference and it needs to be a article now. 68.103.78.155 (talk) 02:37, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see the rush. The event won't happen until September. It will be reviewed before then. Also, one reference is not usually sufficient, we require multiple. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 04:18, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

68.103.78.155 (talk) 02:37, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

02:52:21, 5 February 2020 review of draft by Lawforalllawforone

[edit]


Hello,

I'd like to ensure that edits made following the editor's feedback are consistent with Wikipedia guidelines for living person bios. I have made sure to eliminate any seemingly promotional content, but would also like to know if there are still any items / language that could compromise its approval on re-review - specifically in relation to the brief mentions of his other cases, which are notable in respect to subject matter, media coverage, and scope of impact on legislation, but perhaps not as noticeable as the national and high-profile litigation mentioned elsewhere. I was re-assured by the editor's feedback that the individual is notable, so this question is meant to help me double check that the language meets terms, and whether I should address anything else if needed.

Thank you! Lawforalllawforone (talk) 02:52, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

04:50:32, 5 February 2020 review of submission by Salim M Alhajri

[edit]

Hi Dears, I tried to add article about Majlis Al Dawla (State Council) in Sultanate Of Oman but it rejected by user called ( Bkissin ). He said the article already exists in Wikipedia and can find it and improve it at Council of Oman instead. I don't know how he decided that. There are so many differences between State Council and Council of Oman For example: Council of Oman is a bicameral parliament, made up of the members of the State Council and the Consultation Council. So Majlis Al Dawla is a part of Council of Oman and it have his own privacy.

How can i get approval for my article and puplish it??

Salim M Alhajri (talk) 04:50, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

08:21:24, 5 February 2020 review of submission by IndianWikipedian123

[edit]


IndianWikipedian123 (talk) 08:21, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blatant hoax and a waste of everyone's time, please stop. Theroadislong (talk) 09:08, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

09:58:43, 5 February 2020 review of draft by Sum244

[edit]


Sum244 (talk) 09:58, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sum244, This is a 16 year old. Almost no 16 year olds are notable enough to be on Wikipedia. The only one I can think of is Greta Thunberg, who is literally world famous. We don't write about everyone. Please understand, and focus on editing existing pages for the time being. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 19:52, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

10:58:21, 5 February 2020 review of submission by RonCommons

[edit]

His youtube channel had 100,000 subscribers... Is that notable enough? RonCommons (talk) 10:58, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

He had 100,000+ subscribers on his youtube channel. He made paid personal appearances... Not notable? RonCommons (talk) 11:08, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Correct not notable. Theroadislong (talk) 11:20, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
RonCommons, Very few YouTubers are notable. Even channels with over a million subs routinely don't have Wikipedia pages. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 19:50, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

12:19:19, 5 February 2020 review of submission by Digitliberty2019

[edit]


Digitliberty2019 (talk) 12:19, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Dear Theroadislong,

I want to ask you if you can support me for creating a Biography of Genc Meraku, he is a leading person in Kosovo for Marketing and have made changes in Kosovo history, I will send all supporting documents and necessary materials and references.

Can you help me?

There is no evidence that Genc Meraku is notable in Wikipedia terms. Theroadislong (talk) 12:22, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

13:49:55, 5 February 2020 review of submission by TampaWriter

[edit]

The draft BROOKS REHABILITATION was reviewed on Dec. 17 and rejected because of insufficient references and citations. One Dec. 18, I added sufficient references and citations and resubmitted the article for review. I reached out twice to the original reviewer via my Talk page but have not heard back. I understand the review process can take months and am perfectly willing to wait my turn. I just wonder if there is a way to receive an update on where this draft stands currently, or if there might be someone who can check the revisions I made to determine if it is an acceptable entry now. Thank you for any assistance! Sincerely, TampaWriter

TampaWriter (talk) 13:49, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TampaWriter The current backlog is approximately 4 months. Draft:Brooks Rehabilitation has been in the pool to be reviewed for 6 weeks. Roughly 2,100 submissions have been waiting longer. You can track the draft's age relative to the rest of the pool by monitoring how close it is to the top of Category:Pending AfC submissions (with some minor caveats, drafts are listed from oldest to newest). Drafts are often, although not always, reviewed by a different reviewer each time.
Articles about organizations and companies are among the most problematic on Wikipedia, so much so that a moratorium on new ones has been floated. That's too radical an idea to be adopted at this time, but there are other signs of a shift in emphasis away from creating new articles to improving existing ones. Almost all articles (98+%) are assessed as less than "good" by the community, so there is much room for improvement. As a former journalist, your skills could do more good editing existing articles than drafting new ones. See Wikipedia:Community portal for ways to help. --Worldbruce (talk) 16:53, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

19:55:28, 5 February 2020 review of submission by Felele247

[edit]


I will like to know why the above draft name is declined

Felele247 (talk) 19:55, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The pink box at the top tells you why " submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article" Your draft has only one source, we require at least three reliable independent sources. Theroadislong (talk) 20:14, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

21:38:52, 5 February 2020 review of submission by FWF2019

[edit]

I would like to know why the request for the Fifth Wheel Freight Wikipedia page has been denied and what I can do to increase the probability of it being accepted next time. FWF2019 (talk) 21:38, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FWF2019, It appears to be purely promotional, and likely not notable. We don't write about all companies, and this company does not appear to meet our standards. To fix that you need high quality sources that cover the company. Finding and adding good sources might help. But if the company isn't notable, nothing can fix that.
Also, your username is still promotional, it needs to be changed to something like "Todd at FWF" to clarify that it isn't shared use or a company account. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 00:13, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

21:57:02, 5 February 2020 review of submission by Dj dan bleacher

[edit]


Dj dan bleacher (talk) 21:57, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Dj dan bleacher: Do you have a question of some sort? The red banner at the top of the draft explains the rejection concern. —  HELLKNOWZ   ▎TALK 22:47, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

22:03:06, 5 February 2020 review of submission by Sakimtsev

[edit]


The article is in reference to two enterprizes that were spearheaded by Jack Singleton, who was one of the first initiators of the International Foundation for Telemetering that promoted regulatory standards for frequency allocation. Among many of his activities, he gave birth to two unique companies, Matrix System and then Universal Switching that are main contributors to critical Satcom Communication equipment. Mr. Singleton died but I would like to honor him and to link his life to these two companies.

How can you help? Sakimtsev (talk) 22:03, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'd recommend that you read WP:CITE, and find and add some needed citations on existing pages, before revisiting your draft. DougHill (talk) 22:55, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2020_February_5&oldid=985274794"