Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2019 February 7

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< February 6 << Jan | February | Mar >> February 8 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


February 7

[edit]

04:55:27, 7 February 2019 review of submission by Shivkumawat

[edit]


Shivkumawat (talk) 04:55, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

06:49:49, 7 February 2019 review of submission by Kavita singhania

[edit]


Kavita singhania (talk) 06:49, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:ANYBIO and WP:GNG. Your draft does not have enough secondary, reliable sources that are independent of the subject ―Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk • contribs) 06:52, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

08:18:19, 7 February 2019 review of submission by Vishnu vijay

[edit]

The confusion between "Brian Humphries" (CEO Vodafone) & "Brian Humphries CBE" (Ex CEO EBAA) needs to be resolved. Google is misleading people by showing photo of one Brian and wiki page of another Brian. Thanks for the understanding. Vishnu .V (talk) 08:18, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Vishnu vijay: As explained to you here, the existing article will remain where it is until a reviewer has considered whether your draft is suitable for Wikipedia. If they conclude that it is, they'll use WP:disambiguation to enable both articles to co-exist and to help readers pick the article about the Brian Humphries that they're looking for. There's currently a seven week backlog for drafts awaiting review. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:05, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

09:30:20, 7 February 2019 review of submission by Rizwan708

[edit]


Rizwan708 (talk) 09:30, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The comment left by the reviewer was:

Fails WP:ANYBIO, lacks significant coverage in multiple independent secondary sources. Facebook is not an acceptable source.

Please click into the links and familiarize yourself with our policies, or else your draft will be rejected again and again. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk • contribs) 09:32, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

10:15:11, 7 February 2019 review of submission by Smny2018

[edit]


Smny2018 (talk) 10:15, 7 February 2019 (UTC) Hello,[reply]

I worked in two drafts 3 days ago and they have not been published till now. Can I know why? And when arevthey going to be published?

Regards,

@Smny2018: One has been published, but the other two, Draft:Languages of Saudi Arabia and Draft:The Two Holy Mosques Museum in Makkah have not been reviewed. That is because you've not submitted them for review. There is currently a backlog of about seven weeks so you may have to wait a while before these get reviewed. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 13:56, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

11:16:27, 7 February 2019 review of draft by Klorathy

[edit]


Hi - when using the IMDB template as for other actors in Wikipedia I see the following in my preview: Klorathy/sandbox on IMDb, so my user name rather than the actor's name - is that correct? thx, Bill Parslow Klorathy (talk) 11:16, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Klorathy Welcome to AfC help desk. I have moved your article to Draft:John Locke (actor) and have reviewed the draft. Unfortunately it does not meet the notability requirements at present stage. Pls read the comments on the grey panel at the top of the draft page and click on the links (blue highlighted texts)for further info. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 11:22, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

12:34:12, 7 February 2019 review of submission by Hjlresearcher16

[edit]

What was/are the reason(s) was rejected for publication? Thank you. Hjlresearcher16 Hjlresearcher16 (talk) 12:34, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Hjlresearcher16: The reviewer gave the following explanation: 'Fails WP:GNG, requires significant coverage in multiple independent verifiable secondary sources.' Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 13:52, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

12:42:40, 7 February 2019 review of submission by Bojkaergi

[edit]

Please accept this i am new in word and i don't know many things for word so pls accept my first edit that i am doing !!

Bojkaergi (talk) 12:42, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

13:08:44, 7 February 2019 review of submission by IZinePro

[edit]


I'm film Co-editor in Indian film industry I have edited many films. I have IMDb for source and some small articles.

if this isn't enough what I should do>

IZinePro 13:08, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

@IZinePro: Please read WP:FILMMAKER to understand the criteria we use to decide which filmmakers should have articles about them and which should not. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 13:47, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

My Sandbox Is rejected And I Don't Know Why...

[edit]

15:17:52, 7 February 2019 review of submission by BONGINKOSI

[edit]


Moloi 15:17, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Can Someone Help Me Plz...

BONGINKOSI, Same reason as when you asked two days ago - you're writing about yourself. Autobiographies are frowned upon. And, to be frank, you're not notable. Cabayi (talk) 15:27, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

16:10:10, 7 February 2019 review of submission by Horncritic

[edit]


I posted an article about Harmonie Ensemble New York on Dec. 11, 2018, and it was accepted. But the article doesn't appear in Google under results. It appears in a box to the right. Can something be tweaked so that the article will appear under results? An earlier article about Harmonie Ensemble New York was posted by someone else in Swedish in 2015 (https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harmonie_Ensemble/New_York), but that is not the article I submitted. Many thanks for your assistance.

Horncritic (talk) 16:10, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

After the page is approved at AfC it goes through another process of review before it is released for Indexing. Then Google has to index the page, which generally happens pretty quick. Legacypac (talk) 16:33, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

18:52:50, 7 February 2019 review of submission by Meeplistener

[edit]


Meeplistener (talk) 18:52, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


I have edited the article to conform better with Wikipedia standards by adding inline citations and removing excessive references.

@Meeplistener:  Done I have further improved it and accepted it into mainspace. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:26, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

19:00:35, 7 February 2019 review of draft by Harshita Catherine

[edit]


Good day! I have done my article in my laptop later I checked the article in my phone to see whether it was approved. They were some red and green higlights which I realized were mistakes and changed them accorfingly. I have kept the appropriate reference for the article and corrected the format where ever necessary in my laptop as I couldn't do the same in my phone. But even after editinf the article it still shows me there are 6 edits which I have corrected already in my laptop. Is there something that I have to change ? Can you please guide me through this. Thank you!

Harshita Catherine (talk) 19:00, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Harshita Catherine: - Hi there. I'm not quite sure what you mean. Do you mean you made some edits and they haven't taken effect on the draft?
Usually this means you hit preview and forgot to save. It's probably the oldest mistake to make in Wikipedia (I still do it occasionally). Have you tried re-doing one of the edits and seeing if it "sticks" this time?
Have a look at the view-history tab - can you see an edit there that matches up with your changes? This should confirm if you actually made the change.
If you can see it there, but the mistakes are still in the draft, it's worth refreshing the cache on your laptop and phone - it may be remembering a prior incorrect version (though editing usually causes an automatic update on that particular device).
If it's none of those, please give any extra detail you can think of to help clarify it. Nosebagbear (talk) 22:08, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

21:00:02, 7 February 2019 review of submission by Shfilmmaker

[edit]


I added new information and more broad such as the introduction, personal life, awards and honors, and filmography. Shfilmmaker (talk) 21:00, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

21:25:55, 7 February 2019 review of submission by Skates61

[edit]

Hi, I'm trying to link to the Wikipedia page https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/King%27s_Daughters but I can only link it as an external, not internal link, because there is a %27 in the title, which is said to be invalid characters but that is what is in the Wikipedia title. should I attempt to change the other articles title to remove the %27?? why can't I make this an internal link like it should be? thank you.

Skates61 (talk) 21:25, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Skates61: - Hi there. If you mean you're trying to add an internal link (one of the blue words (like this) from a wiki page (draft or article) then you don't need to write %27 at any point. Instead you just need to write [[King's Daughters]] which will read as King's Daughters, or you can make the link map to different words - e.g. Daughters of the King can be written by using [[King's Daughters|Daughters of the King]]
I hope that solves the issue - let me know if not. Extra detail can be found at WP:WIKILINKS. Nosebagbear (talk) 22:14, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2019_February_7&oldid=883063264"