Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2018 August 28
| Help desk | ||
|---|---|---|
| < August 27 | << Jul | August | Sep >> | August 29 > |
| Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
August 28
[edit]02:12:32, 28 August 2018 review of draft by 2604:2000:C6C9:8F00:10E3:75E4:BBF7:D48F
[edit]
Hello. I have read the submission response comment and am reviewing the Wikipedia style guidelines and working on an revised version of the entry. As I understand it, the main concern is that it is not written in appropriate encyclopedic format and uses language that is not objective in certain instances. If a reviewer could provide any further specific details on improvements that needs to be made to the entry fo publication in Wikipedia, that would be great. I will also include as many hyperlinks to references as I can in the revised submission. Thank you.
2604:2000:C6C9:8F00:10E3:75E4:BBF7:D48F (talk) 02:12, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
07:33:20, 28 August 2018 review of draft by KayTaylor2018tm
[edit]{{SAFESUBST:Void|
There is one link I have on this page that I'm unsure of whether to use for the page https://blog.travelbook.com/travelbook-hotelquickly/ Would this be considered bias content because it's a subdomain of the original website? KayTaylor2018tm (talk) 07:33, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
- [[User::KayTaylor2018tm|
- KayTaylor2018tm]] Greetings. the source is from the subject home page and secondly is it a blog as such there are not independent nor reliable for it can not demonstrate the notability of the subject, and that is same with any sources that is associated/affiliated to the subject, user content generated sites, interview article. We are after independent, reliable sources such as from major newspapers. As the company founded in 2017, for a new start up company, it is usually very difficult to find significant coverage of independent reliable sources to support the content to pass the notability requirements.Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 11:18, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
13:32:15, 28 August 2018 review of draft by NoahhBecker
[edit]- NoahhBecker (talk · contribs)
I submitted an article for review that I translated from French to English but forgot to link it to the original wiki page. I'm new to Wikipedia and don't know how to retract it from submission.
NoahhBecker (talk) 13:32, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
- NoahhBecker, It's now at Draft:GreenYellow You did it OK, but for the exact way, see WP:Translation#How to translate. But I noticee the French article has a notice that it is too promotional . So is your draft. You must avoid sounding like a pres release--describe, don't praise. Avoid adjectives of praise or excellence, or claims without a third party source. Avoid excessive detail such as the exact details of a conversion project.don't explain the basics of energy conservation. Don't use jargon such as "third pillar". And consider carefully whether it would be better to add the key material as a section of Groupe Casino, the parent firm. -- and that's an article that needs some major rewriting also. DGG ( talk ) 23:42, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
22:30:13, 28 August 2018 review of draft by Wikiscrivener
[edit]
I think I accidentally created the Wikipedia page that I intended to create for "Kaitlin Puccio" as "Wikiscrivener." I can't figure out how to fix this.
Wikiscrivener (talk) 22:30, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
- It has to be done by a page move. I;ve done that for you. DGG ( talk ) 23:24, 28 August 2018 (UTC)