Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2025 January 7

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Foreseeable that the scope of this template will become too broad (see Russia and France), and thus has been partitioned in three. DemocracyDeprivationDisorder (talk) 11:05, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 14:12, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 21:50, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Single-use citation template from 2020; subst and delete as clearly not as widely needed as expected. Primefac (talk) 21:19, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Full of red links. The two remaining blue links are redirects. Nothing to navigate. plicit 14:09, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NENAN The Banner talk 13:05, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NENAN The Banner talk 13:05, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NENAN The Banner talk 13:05, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NENAN The Banner talk 13:04, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:NGC objects:7500-7840 with Template:NGC objects:7000-7499.
(And rename to Template:NGC objects:7000-7840.) Dropping redlinks and redirects to the list of NGC objects has shrunk the number of articles in these templates to less than half the previous amount. The lists are segmented by thousands, so it would be more consistent to have the nav templates segmented that way, too. I expect many of the other articles currently listed will be determined to be not-notable per WP:NASTRO and will be redirected to the list as well (so these templates will keep shrinking). -- Beland (talk) 10:14, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

LFP Ligue templates

[edit]

Both templates are currently broken due to the website change with the new sponsor. Some links are archived so it could be changed to be similar to {{LFP}}, but someone would need to go through all 700 uses, so I don't think it'sworth it. Nobody (talk) 07:28, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

All individual articles were redirected to the parent article per this AFD, rendering this template unnecessary. Bgsu98 (Talk) 03:12, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]