Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2024 September 18

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Template that contains two redirects and one link to a non-resident mission. Unhelpful for navigation. AusLondonder (talk) 17:19, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 23:44, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template used for linking to the long-obsolete Wikipedia:Portal peer review. As a template for an inactive process, it should be deleted. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 23:36, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Only has 1 entry which is now up for deletion. Even if kept, pointless having a nav box for 1 entry. LibStar (talk) 23:15, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a citation template created in 2009 and has only 1 transclusion. A citation template should be created when it has a substantial amount of usages. A single usage after 15 years shows it doesn't have. Subst the single use and delete the template. Gonnym (talk) 17:53, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

With only one album, this navbox offers no additional navigational benefit. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 16:43, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

3 articles. WP:NENAN --woodensuperman 14:55, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox with no main article and at most one possible blue link in the body. Most or all of the non-red-links lead to disambiguation pages or the wrong target. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:04, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions seven years after its creation. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:58, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, template parameters, documentation, or incoming links. – Jonesey95 (talk) 03:56, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jonesey95 er, the template clearly does have documentation Mach61 03:57, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My mistake. This template appears to be redundant to {{delink}}. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:47, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Jonesey95 Not quite true; the template removes disambiguators as well, hence "ambiguate" Mach61 04:57, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 13:54, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Navbox with only two links in the body. – Jonesey95 (talk) 03:52, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can probably be merged into a decade one as Category:Rail transport accident templates has a lot of templates with 1-3 links (see Template:1862 railway accidents). Gonnym (talk) 08:10, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Merge or delete?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 13:54, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]