Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 March 12

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:07, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused after it was substituted on the 2017 Women's European Volleyball Championship qualification article. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:25, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:07, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and not needed as the chart's content has been added to the Panorpida article. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:04, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:06, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused as the same chart is on the Hymenoptera article under the evolution section within the article space. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:01, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:06, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused map and uneeded map. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:57, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:50, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused footer linking to the awards articles. Redundant to Template:Bram Stoker Award. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:51, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:50, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused map. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:39, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Now substitute since it's single-use. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:15, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:46, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and outdated map. Mainspace has a better map as part of the article. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:37, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:46, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Evidently obsolete - only used on one draft from 2015. Could also be considered redundant to {{Inline parenthetical referencing}}. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:31, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

College basketball Freshman/Newcomer/Rookie of the Year Templates

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:29, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

At WP:CBBALL discussants have decided that the incomplete set of templates represent WP:CREEP and should be deleted rather than encouraged.TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 16:59, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. All WP:CRUFTy and WP:CREEPy. fuzzy510 (talk) 19:22, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:25, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Single use template, so table can just be substed into 2023 Women's Premier League (cricket) and template deleted Joseph2302 (talk) 08:14, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:21, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:V. There are currently no references, and from what I know following the conflict, there simply are not frequent enough reports in RS to support a dynamic map like this in a way that comports with verifiability. This information is better expressed through a static map that can be updated in one go when a reliable report comes out. See also discussion at Talk:Myanmar civil war (2021–present). 25stargeneral (talk) 04:17, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).