Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 June 3

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Celts. Izno (talk) 00:01, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Celts and Modern Celts sidebar (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Celtic nations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Celts (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Celts and Modern Celts sidebar with Template:Celtic nations.
Same topic, significant WP:OVERLAP. Navboxes at the bottom are less intrusive towards the layout of articles (especially top-left infoboxes, images, and tables), and have plenty of space for any relevant items. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 23:43, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Why not merge into say Template:Celts? This is a template, or in this case, a navbox where overlap should exist since it is the main template for the broader subject. It even has a section for Modern and Ancient Celt articles including languages, culture, etc. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:32, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I am certainly open to merging both Template:Celts and Modern Celts sidebar and Template:Celtic nations into Template:Celts as you propose. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 07:42, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Should we tag it as well? Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 07:43, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Go for it. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 14:26, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done Not sure if I did it right, but I agree with you that the merge target should be Template:Celts. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 21:48, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into the main Celts template. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:09, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It seems reasonable to merge to Template:Celts. The series sidebar is placed on so few of the pages it links to. SWinxy (talk) 19:41, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:LSDXOXO

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete for now, with no prejudice against recreation if the main article is kept and another page or two are created that could be added to the navbox. Primefac (talk) 08:43, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:LSDXOXO (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Contains only one directly-related article. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 06:46, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Currently in the process of moving his discography to the Lsdxoxo discography page, and adding some pages for his other releases. BiggestBidder (talk) 04:27, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:05, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 18:27, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. The person who loves reading (talk) 22:11, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Content of Mark

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:42, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Content of Mark (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Single-use navigation template. I don't see any reason to subst it because the section it's used in seems like a reasonable WP:SUMMARY style article. See also previous discussion about Matthew. Izno (talk) 18:25, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Subst per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:25, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. The person who loves reading (talk) 22:11, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Condenser spinning flowchart

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:40, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Condenser spinning flowchart (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Single-use template. Subst and delete. Izno (talk) 18:21, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Subst per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:25, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. The person who loves reading (talk) 22:11, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Australian domestic cricket Labelled Map

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:39, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Australian domestic cricket Labelled Map (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Single mainspace use template. Subst and delete. Izno (talk) 18:18, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Subst per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:25, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. The person who loves reading (talk) 22:11, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Module:External links list

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:34, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Module:External links list (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:External links list (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:External links list Drug (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused experiment from 2019. Izno (talk) 17:44, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:25, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. The person who loves reading (talk) 22:11, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ArticleAlertbotSubscription

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:27, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ArticleAlertbotSubscription (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template no longer used by the process it was designed for. Izno (talk) 17:29, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:25, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. The person who loves reading (talk) 22:11, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:TlscE

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 16:48, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:TlscE (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions or documentation. Created in 2012. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:06, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:25, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. The person who loves reading (talk) 22:11, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Tl-ovw

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 16:56, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Tl-ovw (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Tl-ovw2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Tl2-1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Tl1-2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Tl1-1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Undocumented templates created in 2005. Used only in one blocked user's subpage. Subst and delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:03, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:25, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment as with many templates of this era, and the era before /doc existed, the documentation frequently exists on the talk page, as it does for 2 of these templates, template talk: Tl2-1 and template talk: Tl1-1 -- when nominating old templates for deletion, one should keep that in mind -- 64.229.90.172 (talk) 07:25, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete "enhancements" to {{user}} that were not adopted -- 64.229.90.172 (talk) 07:27, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. The person who loves reading (talk) 22:12, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:TL Region Colour

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 16:56, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:TL Region Colour (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Created in 2006. No transclusions except in one user sandbox. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:01, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:25, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. The person who loves reading (talk) 22:12, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Unused s-line templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:09, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:S-line/DB-IC left/140 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:S-line/DB-IC right/140 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:S-line/RB-BW left/13 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:S-line/RB-BW left/19 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:S-line/RB-BW right/13 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:S-line/RB-BW right/19 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:S-line/RB-RP left/31 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:S-line/RB-RP left/33 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:S-line/RB-RP left/34 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:S-line/RB-RP left/44 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:S-line/RB-RP right/33 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:S-line/RB-RP right/34 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:S-line/RB-RP right/44 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:S-line/RB-RP right/65 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:S-line/RB-SL right/72 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:S-line/RB-SL right/73 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:S-line/RE-RP left/2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:S-line/RE-RP left/3 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:S-line/RE-RP right/15 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:S-line/RE-RP right/17 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:S-line/RE-RP right/2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:S-line/RE-RP right/3 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:S-line/RE-RP right/60 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused s-line templates. --Gonnym (talk) 12:06, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:25, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. The person who loves reading (talk) 22:12, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Peru squad Brazil Independence Cup

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 16:57, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Peru squad Brazil Independence Cup (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per long-standing consensus at NFOOTY, squad templates only created for top-level international tournaments. A one-off Brazil Independence Cup isn't that. BlameRuiner (talk) 08:15, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Given an entire article exists about the full roster and it was described as a major international tournament at tbe time, I don't see how the inclusion of squad templates are a detriment. This isn't even mentioning that WP:NFOOTY seems to be an obsolete redirect. SuperSkaterDude45 (talk) 17:12, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I meant to mention FOOTY as a project, my apologies. The major tournaments are World Cup, Confederations Cup, Olympics, and the 6 tournaments for each continent (UEFA Euro, Copa America and so on). Full squad articles exist for hundreds of other tournaments, without the templates. BlameRuiner (talk) 17:51, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:25, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. The person who loves reading (talk) 22:12, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Talkbox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:14, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Talkbox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Created in 2015. Just two transclusions in talk pages. This never caught on, and for good reason. It should be substed – or (probably better) replaced by a simple talk page post with a normal signature – and deleted. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:36, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete without subst. Replace with regular text as this breaks the reply tool. Gonnym (talk) 09:13, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:25, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. The person who loves reading (talk) 22:12, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Talk header templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Izno (talk) 16:57, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Talk header templates (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions. Created in 2019. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:33, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Jonesey95: If this was transcluded, would that be worth it? I'd be willing to add it to the various entries. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 16:06, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have no opinion either way. It seems like a useful navbox, but it is possible that it was added to some pages in the past and then rejected for some reason. I don't have a way to know. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:34, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I'd say add them to the template pages. I think this is pretty useful. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:25, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It's useful per WikiCleanerMan. The person who loves reading (talk) 22:13, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:RestoredPROD

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 16:59, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:RestoredPROD (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Used by a single (now deceased) editor, doesn't seem to have caught on. Substitute and ~~delete~~ redirect to Template:Prod contested. CLYDE ^{TALK TO ME}/_{STUFF DONE} (please mention me on reply) 04:20, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - A more popular iteration of it can be recreated through a Village Pump discussion 2001:48F8:3004:FC4:D480:5FD5:9310:3BA4 (talk) 05:06, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@ClydeFranklin: 2001:48F8:3004:FC4:D480:5FD5:9310:3BA4 (talk) 05:07, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Subst per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:25, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
WikiCleanerMan and IP which I cannot ping and I will send a {{talkback}} to: there seems to be a more used and advanced template with the same meaning, {{Prod contested}}. I think it should still be substituted, but then redirected there. Would you two be willing to change your !votes? CLYDE ^{TALK TO ME}/_{STUFF DONE} (please mention me on reply) 22:44, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per nom. The person who loves reading (talk) 22:14, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).