Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 November 2

< November 1	November 3 >

November 2

Template:Great Five Waterfalls

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:40, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Great Five Waterfalls (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

I can't find any sources which make this contentious "great five" claim. The template's creator has left two sources in the talk page which are in Russian from 1975 and 1987, but I can't identify any sources in English which make this purely subjective assertion, that there are five waterfalls commonly known as the "Great Five." The header directs to a statement in List of waterfalls by flow rate: "The first five waterfalls by power (Guaíra, Khone Phapheng, Iguazú, Niagara, and Victoria) are called the Great Five Waterfalls" using identical Russian sources. For the record, one of those falls was completely submerged in 1982 and is no longer a thing.

These may be good faith additions, but I think it more likely this titling is a mere assertion. I can't identify any sources which rank waterfalls by "power" nor any sources which list these five as the "great" ones. BusterD (talk) 17:11, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:02, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Copa de 4 equipos eliminación Page

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:40, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Copa de 4 equipos eliminación Page (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Appears to be redundant to {{4TeamBracket-PagePlayoff}} (see the bottom example in the documentation). Also, it is unused, has no documentation or categories, and appears to be an unattributed and untranslated copy of a bracket template from es.WP. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:09, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:03, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WTA Tier I

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:WTA Tier I tournaments. Technically the two templates were merged, so keeping the redirect is appropriate. Primefac (talk) 12:44, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WTA Tier I (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to Template:WTA Tier I tournaments. Qwerty284651 (talk) 13:26, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:03, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@WikiCleanerMan, how does one replace the transclusions with {{WTA Tier I tournaments}} in one big swoop instead of editing every page separately? Qwerty284651 (talk) 22:32, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Only 1988 and 1989 don't have the template on it's page. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:38, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am aware of that, but you didn't answer my question how does one replace all transclusions in 1 edit instead of 19?

You don't need to edit all 19 pages. Only two pages don't have that template. After deletion, the template will be automatically removed. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 14:01, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I want to/have to replace the child with the parent template prior to deletion. How do I do that? Qwerty284651 (talk) 05:19, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hindu temples in Myanmar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. ✗plicit 23:40, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Hindu temples in Myanmar (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No improvement since the last Tfd. Still the same three articles. Fails NENAN. Not a single keep vote from the previous discussion actually addressed the lack of navigation per the rule of thumb of NENAN. No reason to keep around just like last time. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:48, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

keep, useful for navigating between articles and part of the "Hindu temples in XYZ" series. Frietjes (talk) 22:49, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:34, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep actually vitally important because the articles do not link to each other. Partofthemachine (talk) 22:46, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:The Paper Chase

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:44, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:The Paper Chase (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Contains two links just for the adaptations of the novel. Nothing else exists for the book's lore or universe of adaptations. Certainly not a film series navbox despite the category. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:44, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 01:58, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 15:47, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).