Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 November 11

< November 10	November 12 >

November 11[edit]

Template:Polokwane City F.C. squad[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:04, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Polokwane City F.C. squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Delete. Very outdated, and as such not a single player remains today. The team has been relegated and their current players don't have articles (see whatlinkshere). Thus there is no need for a navigational template.. 80.203.59.161 (talk) 08:38, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. Giant Snowman 08:17, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - trusting IP that if the template was updated, it would contain only or majorly redlinks. I've randomly checked a few players from the current squad and none have Wikipedia articles, so assume that none do. Giant Snowman 08:21, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:43, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom, not enough blue links if updated correctly. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:33, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Frequency (franchise)[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 November 18. ✗plicit 04:28, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Frequency_(franchise) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:The Boondock Saints[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 04:28, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:The Boondock Saints (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Pointless. Not needed. ★Trekker (talk) 01:11, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:43, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Blonde (franchise)[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 04:26, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Blonde (franchise) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Pointless. Too few articles to be useful. ★Trekker (talk) 00:24, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:43, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete only two directly relevant blue links, not enough for a template. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:47, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Promising Young Woman[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 04:25, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Promising Young Woman (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Pointless, only 4 articles here. ★Trekker (talk) 00:22, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Five. It passes the rule of five, WP:NENAN. Emerald Fennell, Promising Young Woman, Promising Young Woman (soundtrack), Promising Young Woman (score), and List of accolades received by Promising Young Woman. Vexedsmuggery (talk) 03:19, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The author's article is not something that should be used to support a template.★Trekker (talk) 03:26, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:43, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).