Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 January 19

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< January 18 January 20 >

January 19

[edit]

Template:Orlen Wisła Płock squad

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:44, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and outdated Polish handball team navboxes. Better to have the list of current players listed on the mainspaces as they are and would most likely fail NENAN for the limited number of articles for the players. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:18, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Richmond Football Club (reserves) current squad

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:45, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Outdated team template used on the wrong space. There is no way that the current template reflects the squad from the 2016 to 2021 seasons for the Richmond team. This is not needed. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:10, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Papua New Guinea Hunters 2019 squad

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:52, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An unused malformed template that already has a squad list in table format on the 2019 season article for the team. This is not needed. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:44, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FK Mogren Budva squad

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:47, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All of these squad navboxes for football/squad teams are outdated and unused. The mainspaces for these teams roster section has more redlinks than existing articles and updating them to reflect such lists would fail NENAN. The Syracuse Silver Knights haven't been the Knights since the end of the 2017-2018 season. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:41, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:This is a redirect/collapse top

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:47, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused sub-templates of Template:This is a redirect which itself was redirected. Gonnym (talk) 18:39, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:16TeamBracket-One-Reseed

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 21:14, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused bracket template. Gonnym (talk) 18:31, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Northwest Airlines Flight 253

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:49, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Single-use nav template which, 12 years later, is now superseded in both usefulness and visual standardization by both Template:Infobox aircraft occurrence and Template:Infobox terrorist attack. Serves no function which is not already handled by the article's table of contents box Headphase (talk) 18:16, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Basically 3 links in the sidebar: Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, reactions and aftermath. All linked from the main article in other places and the 3 linked articles have clear links back to the main article. Oddly the text in the "Reactions and investigations" and "Aftermath" sections of the main article seems to be very similar to that in the separate articles, making me wonder whether 2 of the 3 linked articles are actually worth having. Also there's no category structure for this bombing attempt, which would help navigation. Nigej (talk) 18:52, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox drug/chem styled

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:32, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Added subpage {{Infobox drug/chem styled/atom}} explicitly for clarity. -DePiep (talk) 12:35, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unused, deprecated since 2015 because: don't use colored font, not to convey a legend meaning (per WP:access, and more). E.g. {{Chem2}} covers chemical formula. ​ DePiep (talk) 12:21, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. This is G7 (as they are the author and only contributor) incase an admin sees this and can close this early. Gonnym (talk) 12:31, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
(I tried G7 via the talkpage but talkpage was not by me [1] ;-) -DePiep (talk) 12:41, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2022_January_19&oldid=1068162991"