Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 July 12

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Cologne Stadtbahn templates

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:16, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

{{s-line}} templates for the Cologne Stadtbahn. Replaced by Module:Adjacent stations/Cologne Stadtbahn. All transclusions replaced. There are 22 dependent s-line data modules that should also be deleted. Mackensen (talk) 22:49, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:17, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Propose substituting onto the List of political parties in Ukraine article since this is a single-use template and a list like this shouldn't be on it's own template. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:05, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:17, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Propose substituting onto the 8th Ukrainian Verkhovna Rada article since this is a single-use template. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:05, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:23, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All three should be substituted on the election articles per the standard on the other Ukrainian Presidential election articles. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:05, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:17, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Single-use templates that should be substituted onto the 2014 Kyiv local election article. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:05, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Czech Republic Elections

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:24, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The first three are unused and not needed as the respective article already use different tables for the results. The 2008 and 2010 Senate election templates should be substituted on the Senate articles per the standard on the Czech Senate election articles. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:09, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:16, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2012 is unused and 2008 should be substituted per the standard on Lithuanian parliamentary election articles. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:56, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete/subst and delete as appropriate. Unused or unnecessary single-use templates. The 2008 one can be called from other articles using the #section function. Number 57 11:50, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:15, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused as the article uses a different table for the election results. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:50, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 July 19. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:41, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Iceland Elections

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:13, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The first template is majority red links linking to mainly non-existent templates. The presidential election templates should be substituted onto the respective article as they are only single-use. The Althing or parliament templates should not be a template to begin with. Instead, the information should be transcluded onto the parliamentary election articles as for whatever its majority text, which is information that belongs on articles, not templates. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:38, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:12, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Single-use templates with no chance of being updated in the future. Should be substituted onto the Yerevan City Council election articles. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:26, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:12, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cassette tape is one particular type of magnetic tape with its own article and not a category. Cassette tape is already subsumed under Category:Tape_recording which should be sufficient. This is not like Optical disc which has many types but more like hard disk drives which does not have a template. Tom94022 (talk) 18:33, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Transnistria Elections

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:10, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

At the minimum the 2015 legislative and 2016 presidential templates are unused. The 2016 article uses a different table. The rest should be substituted onto the articles it was created for as these are single-use templates and the information is not needed on separate templates. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:50, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).