Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 January 29

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 February 7. (non-admin closure) --Trialpears (talk) 22:51, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 04:32, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant with {{Administrative divisions of the Philippines}}. Please see Template talk:Administrative divisions of the Philippines#Template:Regions of the Philippines for more information. —hueman1 (talk contributions) 14:34, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:02, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This template is deprecated and replaced with the unsubst module. I would say either figure out a way to get this template to call the unsubst module like other templates can or delete this template. Aasim (talk) 07:13, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Refund applies in case someone want to include the family tree or parts of the family tree in an article. (non-admin closure) --Trialpears (talk) 22:59, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused family tree template. Is linked in a couple "see also" sections which seems an inappropriate use of both "see also" sections and template namespace. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 03:31, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:10, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep but might need to prune the tree. From looking up the Aliyev family, it looks like they may be a super influential family in Azerbaijan. It's possible that the Karbalayi Abbasgulu side of the tree isn't really worth including, but I think this may be a Wikipedia:Systemic bias issue (in that we - I was also going to say delete initially - personally don't know about these people and therefore assume they aren't notable). Read the lead of Ilham Aliyev - its possible that allegedly the presidential election maybe was fake (that was sarcasm, things seem dictator-y). The Aliyevs have been the "elected" Presidents since 1993. See also Heydar Aliyev's cult of personality which specifically mentions that Heydar "began to carefully design an autocratic system, with heavy reliance on family and clan members, oil revenues and patronage (emphasis added by me)". --Xurizuri (talk) 06:11, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:02, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, unclear purpose Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 03:30, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Stellantis

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 February 8. Primefac (talk) 13:53, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Rachael Heyhoe Flint Trophy templates

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 04:45, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pointless templates, as only used on one article. Therefore, we should subst and delete Joseph2302 (talk) 14:49, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 02:25, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Bob Willis Trophy templates

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 February 8. (non-admin closure)Piranha249 (Discuss with me) 16:36, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).