Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 August 26

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

August 26

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 08:08, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. * Pppery * it has begun... 17:50, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 23:47, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused after being replaced by a better map Frietjes (talk) 17:23, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 10:16, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 23:48, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This template's functionality can be replaced with {{rail color box}} and Module:Adjacent stations/Basel S-Bahn. See live examples at Basel trinational S-Bahn and Wiese Valley Railway (lede has the old template, infobox has the new). No need for a separate, standalone template. I don't think a pass-through would be appropriate; the current template doesn't support all current services and there aren't many transclusions. Mackensen (talk) 12:42, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).