Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 April 6

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 6

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G8 by Plastikspork (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:01, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unneeded documentation for redirected template. – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:26, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete but for slightly different reasons from what Devopam gave. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:45, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is a redirect to the correctly spelled 'O' (capitalized). Devopam (talk) 11:45, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

normally, I would say "go discuss it at RFD", but looking at the template history, I say speedy delete per author request. Frietjes (talk) 12:37, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:33, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Contains single entry, defeating the very purpose. Not linked from Devopam (talk) 11:24, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) — JJMC89(T·C) 03:58, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Footer Olympic Champions Women's mass start with Template:Footer Olympic Champions Men's mass start.
Follow up from deletion discussion at Women's mass start (no consensus), these templates need to be discussed together. Bellezzasolo Discuss 10:56, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 April 15. Primefac (talk) 15:57, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).