Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 November 22

< November 21	November 23 >

November 22

Template:Globalization sidebar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:45, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Globalization sidebar (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

I can't help but think that this template is redundant to Outline of globalization. This does not do much that the outline can't. I mean, when I was trying to expand the template, I pretty much started copying from the outline page. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 00:02, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Addendum It is also made obsolete by {{Globalization}} which can also go onto mainspace. I don't see how the sidebar is or can be useful, because it has too few links as it stands, and adding more links necessitate copying from the either outline and/or the navbox. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 00:10, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete, after replacing with the navbox where appropriate. Frietjes (talk) 21:53, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Partidobr

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:40, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Partidobr (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

WTF in Spanish? Wikisaurus (talk) 23:11, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep. Used in National Congress of Brazil, for example. And it's in Portuguese. I have translated the documentation and linked to the version on pt.WP. Can we get a speedy keep here please? – Jonesey95 (talk) 02:55, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete after replacing with the corresponding entries in Category:Brazil political party colour templates, which is the standard system used at this WP. Frietjes (talk) 14:53, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- comment, I have boldly replaced it in Federal Senate, Chamber of Deputies (Brazil), and National Congress of Brazil after creating any missing meta/color templates (or redirects). Frietjes (talk) 19:02, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete slowly per Frietjes; when we already have a standard scheme for this kind of thing, we don't need a second one. If we didn't have a scheme already, it would be fine to keep this one. Nyttend (talk) 23:21, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).