Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 November 21
November 21
[edit]Record label templates revisited
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was keep KPOP labes and delete the rest.
- Keep Template:YG Entertainment
- Keep Template:Woollim Entertainment
- Delete Template:Top Dawg Entertainment
- Delete Template:Stones Throw Records
- Delete Template:Reel Life Productions
- Delete Template:Poe Boy Entertainment
- Delete Template:Mush Records
- Delete Template:Mallupy Entertainment
- Delete Template:K2L Entertainment
- Keep Template:Jungle Entertainment
- Delete Template:Hospital Records
- Delete Template:Brainfeeder
- Delete Template:ATO Records
- Template:YG Entertainment (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Woollim Entertainment (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Top Dawg Entertainment (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Stones Throw Records (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Reel Life Productions (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Poe Boy Entertainment (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Mush Records (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Mallupy Entertainment (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:K2L Entertainment (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Jungle Entertainment (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Hospital Records (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Brainfeeder (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:ATO Records (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
A long standing consensus and precedent says to exclude record label rosters and catalogues from related navboxes. See also Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 September 28#Record label templates and ongoing Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 November 20#Template:Monstercat. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 17:27, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and per prior consensus. --woodensuperman 09:06, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep {{YG Entertainment}}, {{Woollim Entertainment}}, and {{Jungle Entertainment}}. South Korean record labels are intrinsically different in operation compared to those in the western world. See the previous nomination for YG Entertainment, where Evaders99 and KIDE777 lay it out in detail. Neutral to the rest. ℯxplicit 05:37, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep like ℯxplicit said, South Korean labels are deferent than the western onces. GD.BB (talk) 23:22, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep the Kpop labels, the rest delete. Sro23 (talk) 21:16, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep As mentioned, South Korean labels (YG, Woolim, Jungle Ent.) are run differently. No comment for other record labels as I am not familiar with them. Requiem II (talk) 12:47, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 19:52, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- Template:Stacey Solomon (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Not enough links to warrant a navbox. Both songs mentioned are covers anyway! --woodensuperman 16:23, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- delete, can be connected through infobox succession links. Frietjes (talk) 14:22, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 19:53, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Had a lot of entries which failed WP:FILMNAV, also a list of theatre shows he has been in - also not suitable for a navbox. Now these have been trimmed there is nothing left to navigate. --woodensuperman 15:46, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- delete Frietjes (talk) 14:21, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 19:53, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- Template:RecordTV television series and miniseries (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
unused and almost entirely links to the PT wikipedia. Frietjes (talk) 15:10, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Linking away from the English Wikipedia does not aid navigation within the site. --woodensuperman 09:05, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 19:53, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Non-English template WOSlinker (talk) 10:05, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- delete, pointless. Frietjes (talk) 14:20, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 19:54, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Unused template with inaccuracies. Repetition of similar templates such as Template:People of Cao Wei and Template:People of the end of Han dynasty. LDS contact me 06:18, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- delete, better to link to Cao Wei family trees. Frietjes (talk) 14:19, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).