Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 July 20

< July 19	July 21 >

July 20

Template:High Desert/ Eastern Sierra Radio

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 July 29. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:06, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:High Desert/ Eastern Sierra Radio (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Balti people

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:40, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Balti people (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, fails WP:NENAN Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 03:38, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades^Godric 18:28, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:The Hill School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:38, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:The Hill School (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unnecessary, most pages nominated for deletion. Pretentious, and created for the sole purpose of promoting the school's prestige, along with the splintering of all the contained articles. Peapod21 (talk) 22:18, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete if the articles are deleted, and keep if the articles are kept. Frietjes (talk) 15:34, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:58, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

keepNot sure how a template is supposed to make a school more prestigious. But here is a good example of a template for a school that increases accessibility, which should be a example to emulate https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Template:The_Doon_School Hyungjoo98 (talk) 09:35, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Update: All articles except for non Hill School related and routine alumni/head of school pages have been deleted. alphalfalfa^(talk) 01:47, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Frietjes (talk) 14:25, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. All but two of the entries were tangential. --Rob Sinden (talk) 14:59, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Trivial navbox, easily replaced by links in article text. — Rwxrwxrwx (talk) 15:02, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hungary bids for the Olympic Games

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:40, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Hungary bids for the Olympic Games (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Useless. Only one valid link. Rob Sinden (talk) 14:20, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not enough links....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 15:52, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Turkey bids for the Olympic Games

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:41, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Turkey bids for the Olympic Games (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only one valid link. useless. Rob Sinden (talk) 14:20, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not enough links....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 16:14, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Czech Republic bids for the Olympic Games

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:41, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Czech Republic bids for the Olympic Games (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Useless. Only one valid link. Rob Sinden (talk) 14:18, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bids for the 1960 Winter Olympics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:41, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bids for the 1960 Winter Olympics (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Useless. All redlinks. Rob Sinden (talk) 14:18, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Dangerous

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:42, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Dangerous (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, overly vague name Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 07:10, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't that meant to be substed? – Uanfala 13:52, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Frietjes (talk) 14:12, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:W3C-valid

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:41, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:W3C-valid (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, unclear purpose Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 05:32, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This template is intended to provide a badge and link to W3C validator to validate wiki article for HTML errors. This template could be used especially on portals and talk pages (to place there th result of HTML validation and what can be fixed). See: Help:Markup validation. --Rezonansowy_akaRezy (talk | contribs) 07:52, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:27, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Frietjes (talk) 14:09, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Canada bids for the Olympic Games

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:42, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Canada bids for the Olympic Games (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, all redlinks Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 05:45, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Frietjes (talk) 14:14, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Only one valid link. --Rob Sinden (talk) 14:19, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bids for the 2026 Winter Olympics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 July 29. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:41, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bids for the 2026 Winter Olympics (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Leslye Headland

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:29, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Leslye Headland (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not enough links to provide useful navigation. See WP:NENAN Rob Sinden (talk) 13:18, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete. it appears the articles are already well-connected where it's useful. Frietjes (talk) 13:28, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for now since this template used to have writing credits, which the guidelines are against. Two directing credits are not enough to sustain an article. I find three preferable because there is less chance of each individual article mentioning the other two (as opposed to two films mentioning their respective predecessor or successor). Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 13:31, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Martha Elizabeth Burchfield Richter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:30, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Martha Elizabeth Burchfield Richter (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Now that the entries which were not closely enough related to the subject have been removed, there are not enough links to provide meaningful navigation. Rob Sinden (talk) 13:05, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete. it appears the articles are already well-connected where it's useful. Frietjes (talk) 13:29, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I am working on building up individual artwork pages for notable pieces but have had trouble getting Wikipedia copyright approval even with the proper permissions. This allowed one of the pages to be deleted. Erikaschoene (talk) 05:11, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:The Royal Collection Department

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:28, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:The Royal Collection Department (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

A mess of a navbox. There are over 7000 works of art in the Royal Collection, so picking a few to include here is selective and subjective. Things such as the Crown Jewels are better handled with their own navbox {{Crown Jewels of the United Kingdom}}, etc. Rob Sinden (talk) 12:17, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: For the stated reasons. Firebrace (talk) 17:49, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Robert Antoine Pinchon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 July 29. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:41, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Robert Antoine Pinchon (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Théodore Chassériau

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:41, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Théodore Chassériau (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not enough active links to warrant a navbox. Rob Sinden (talk) 11:40, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete, but make sure the list of works is in the parent article before deleting. Frietjes (talk) 13:32, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Political parties in Donetsk People's Republic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:37, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Political parties in Donetsk People's Republic (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The template fails basic Wikipedia policies such WP:N, WP:V, WP:NOTNEWS, and others. Rowan03 (talk) 11:13, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 20:43, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cc-by-3.0,2.5,2.0,1.0

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 July 29. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:37, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cc-by-3.0,2.5,2.0,1.0 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Geographic location

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 July 29. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:05, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Geographic location (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).