Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 October 29

< October 28	October 30 >

October 29

Template:Takeoff and landing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was redirect {{Takeoff and landing}} to {{Types of take-off and landing}}. There is nothing to merge, the templates are line by line identical, apart from the (static) name and title, and a single extra category in Types of take-off and landing. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 09:49, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Takeoff and landing (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Types of take-off and landing (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Takeoff and landing with Template:Types of take-off and landing.
Duplicate templates, the second title is more descriptive, request merge per discussion at WT:AIR. Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 15:30, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge - makes logical sense to me. - Ahunt (talk) 23:01, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Merge - the newer Takeoff and landing template is redundant and it will serve as an alternate name. -Fnlayson (talk) 23:13, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Merge - both not needed. MilborneOne (talk) 08:28, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Merge - their content is almost if not wholly identical. The longer title is more specific and I would prefer it. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 19:57, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

DXChapter templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:26, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DXChapter (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:DXChapterStart (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:DXChapterEnd (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to the {{FratChapter}} set of templates, Used in only one article. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:22, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete Frietjes (talk) 17:43, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:AMA

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:53, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AMA (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Used on only two articles. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:12, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

weak keep, seems useful for providing uniform colouring in the same way that the various Fb bg templates and Fb rbr t pos templates provide uniform colouring. Frietjes (talk) 15:37, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
weak keep, as a subst: only template. It's only really used on 2006 AMA Superbike Championship season. I could be sensitive to the consistency argument if any of the other years articles used this, but they don't. I can imagine it being somewhat useful to quickly and consistently set up such pages - but apparently, it's not needed to be transcluded there, or it would be used. I can see utility to consistently subst: it in though. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 10:02, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep, preferably as a subst-only template per Frietjes and Martijn Hoekstra —PC -XT + 04:49, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:ATCRow

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:52, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ATCRow (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused 2005 creation. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:10, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Bridgeimg templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete with no quorum and no objection to deletion Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 14:10, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bridgeimg (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:BridgeimgStart (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:BridgeimgEnd (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:06, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Cityproperentry

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was moved to userspace Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 06:27, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cityproperentry (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:59, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

userfy Frietjes (talk) 15:38, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- whereto? Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 12:07, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - the author's userspace. Frietjes (talk) 23:56, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    - The author hasn't touched this template for more than four years. I have no objection to userfication if somebody wants it in their userspace, but I can't see any indication they would like to have it userfied. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 08:06, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
delete with no objection to userfication if the creator would like that. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 08:06, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Ctr

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2014 November 29. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:52, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Tlrp templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. No quorum, no objection to deletion Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 10:20, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Tlr (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Tlrp (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Tlrp2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:53, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Tlwrow

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. No quorum, no objection to deletion.Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 10:23, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Tlwrow (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Fork of {{tlrow}}. Unused. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:51, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Tlurow

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete and replace with {{usbk}} Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 10:55, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Tlurow (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Fork of {{tlrow}}. Used on only four user pages. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:50, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

weak delete and replace with {{usbk}}. Frietjes (talk) 15:46, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Notableresliststart

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete as unused Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 10:25, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Notableresliststart (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, after I Subst: the only instance (on Woking). Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:32, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete Frietjes (talk) 17:45, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Rest area list templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:51, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Rest area list top (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Rest area list entry (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:22, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete—most highway articles omit rest areas, but if they do include them, most insert them into the junction list table. That's probably these templates are not in use. Imzadi 1979 → 23:07, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. –Fredddie ™ 01:57, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete never been a fan of these tables. --Rs chen 7754 07:40, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Ayeza Khan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Template does not exist. If the template linked contains a typo, feel free to correct the typo and un-close this discussion. AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:12, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ayeza Khan (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The article was deleted of lack of reliable sources, it is recreated without reliable sources.The subject does still not passes WP:Notability (people) as subject has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions. Cited sources do not establish the notability, there should be significant coverage of the subject. Justice007 (talk) 21:08, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Mem/mb

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as T3 by Gadget850 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:00, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Mem/mb (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:03, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -- Gadget850^talk 21:43, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Silver line

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2014 November 29. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:51, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Bronze line

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2014 November 29. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:51, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Grey line

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2014 November 29. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:50, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Gold line

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2014 November 29. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:49, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Bg-c

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2014 November 29. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:49, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Bf-Zeile

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 05:07, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bf-Zeile (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Used in {{Bahnhofsliste}}, where it should be Subst:. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:09, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete Frietjes (talk) 15:52, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Can we subst provided there is no impact on {{Bahnhofsliste}} and no impact on translators? --Bermicourt (talk) 12:24, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:DDR row

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy keep (withdrawn by nominator, and nobody else supports deletion). --ais523 05:17, 30 October 2014 (U T C)

Template:DDR row (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

~~Unused.~~ Used on one page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:47, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No it isn't. James F. (talk) 20:15, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This template is used to build Wikipedia:Dump reports, which at the moment, is seriously screwed up because of the TFD template at the top of the row template. --Redrose64 (talk) 20:23, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- My error; withdrawn. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:42, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:9x9 type square

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete as unused and not needed Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 12:09, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:9x9 type square (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused; 2005 creation. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:46, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete, not needed, apparently, on Lo Shu Square. Frietjes (talk) 17:52, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Easytable

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by AzaToth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:00, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Easytable (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused 2006 creation. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:44, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Balanced columns list

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:34, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Balanced columns list (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused in articles., barely used otherwise (6 transclusions). Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 09:09, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete, better to use colbegin/end to balance columns. Frietjes (talk) 17:50, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Chivas USA squad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:34, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Chivas USA squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The club has just ceased operations. See here. – Michael (talk) 02:49, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. – Michael (talk) 02:51, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - club is now defunct so no longer needs a 'current squad' template. Giant Snowman 20:14, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.