Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 August 6

< August 5	August 7 >

August 6

Template:Mass Effect chronology

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete, if there is something useful to merge into the main navbox, feel free to do so. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:44, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Mass Effect chronology (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

It contains original research, fancruft, and most of its pages do not exist or are mere redirects. Also, we already have Template:Mass Effect. I also asked WikiProject Video games and there seems to be a consensus for deletion. --Niwi3 (talk) 18:36, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete per prior consensus to delete these chronology sidebars. Frietjes (talk) 19:45, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - In-universe cruft. Similar templates, such as ones for the fictional timeline of the The Legend of Zelda had a similar consensus to delete. Sergecross73 msg me 22:43, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - The template contains useful information that's not present anywhere else therefore augmenting Template:Mass Effect, and as such should be kept. As far as I can tell, it doesn't meet any of the established criteria for template deletion (https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:TFD#REASONS) either. — Preceding unsigned comment added by I really need that username (talk • contribs) 20:59, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This template has serious issues. It is way too detailed for the general reader and contains original research as there are no reliable sources that support this chronology. --Niwi3 (talk) 21:21, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge useful links into Template: Mass Effect. Links to the other games is good for a navbox, but with a master template for the Mass Effect games, it doesn't seem needed to seperate them when there's not that many. Supernerd11 _{Firemind ^_^ Pokedex} 03:02, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The template doesn't have useful links due to the following reasons: a) half of the links don't exist; b) those that exist points to either a redirect to a Mass Effect page or to a useful Mass Effect page, which in that case is already included in Template: Mass Effect. Therefore, the template is useless. --Niwi3 (talk) 18:23, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:PD-NT-DOT

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:43, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PD-NT-DOT (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Copyright status of Canadian government work are copyrighted and not in public domain.[1] Currently no image is using this template and there is no likelihood that the template will be used in the future as indicated by the copyright issue. OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 18:17, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. ArcAngel (talk) ) 18:26, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Above and beyond the grounds set out in the nom, the template does not even make sense. It refers, oddly, to "the Provincial government of Canada", when there is more than one, and the NWT isn't even a province. Not even sure that NWT has authority to release its works into the public domain -- territories are creatures of the federal government, and not aware of any such release at the federal level. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 17:14, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Awkward TV

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:43, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Awkward TV (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 14:35, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. ArcAngel (talk) ) 15:47, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Only two links (with one more each in the header and footer) doesn't need a navbox. Supernerd11 _{Firemind ^_^ Pokedex} 03:04, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:7de Laan cast

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:42, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:7de Laan cast (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

doesn't connect any articles, since only the parent article is transcluding the navbox. Frietjes (talk) 14:31, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I currently see three articles linked aside from the main one. ArcAngel (talk) ) 15:49, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- what links here Frietjes (talk) 19:44, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Trinity Centre for Asian Studies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was deleted per G7. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:26, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Trinity Centre for Asian Studies (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Copy of draft article (Draft:Trinity Centre for Asian Studies) misplaced in template space. Unfortunately PROD doesn't seem to apply to templates. —teb728 t c 11:17, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is spam masquerading in the template space. ArcAngel (talk) ) 15:47, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.