Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 November 26
November 26
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. DrKiernan (talk) 21:14, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Unused. NSH002 (talk) 21:45, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. DrKiernan (talk) 21:14, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
This navbox is a stand-alone creation that fails to meet these guidelines of WP:NAVBOX:
The subject of the template should be mentioned in every article. → Not a single article mentions the navbox topic- The articles should refer to each other, to a reasonable extent. → None of them refer to each other
- There should be a Wikipedia article on the subject of the template. → No article exists
- You would want to list many of these articles in the See also sections of the articles. → Not true
The only guideline which may qualify under WP:NAVBOX is "All articles within a template relate to a single, coherent subject," but that alone is not enough to keep a navbox that's essentially fancruft for the Big Sky Conference. The creator also has a history of making navboxes that have been deleted. I'm not saying this is any reason to delete this particular one in question, I'm merely pointing out that perhaps User:Sigep 252 has not yet learned what should be considered as a navbox. Jrcla2 (talk) 19:55, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Jweiss11 (talk) 05:16, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Rikster2 (talk) 16:10, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Could be replaced by a category. YBG (talk) 01:02, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. DrKiernan (talk) 21:14, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Fork of Template:Infobox_attraction specific to the Sentosa island resort in Singapore. 9 transclusions. eh bien mon prince (talk) 11:12, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
- I agree. It can be deleted. -- Magioladitis (talk) 00:51, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. DrKiernan (talk) 21:14, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Unusual concept for a navbox. If every single film or TV programme containing one or more songs from a stage musical were included (I assume that's the purpose, anyway), it would be impossibly enormous. How does this template serve as a useful navigational tool? SuperMarioMan 01:16, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete This navbox has too vague inclusion criteria. Vanjagenije (talk)
- Delete - agglomeration of vaguely related items. -- Whpq (talk) 17:26, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. DrKiernan (talk) 21:14, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
- Template:BlueSig (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Individual user signature, which does not really belong in the main template namespace. It has not yet been transcluded anywhere, and in any case would not be an acceptable Wikipedia signature because it contains images. SuperMarioMan 00:20, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
- delete per nom, plus transclusion of templates is forbidden in signatures, even subst:ing them is not a good idea. --NSH002 (talk) 22:32, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.