Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 June 21
June 21
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:22, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
This template had six blue links in the body until they were all deleted. It's now present on only one page, and quite unhelpful as a navbox. BDD (talk) 19:05, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete - The articles were deleted so this is no longer needed. Kumioko (talk) 19:56, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:22, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
- Template:Usernameexpand (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
This template is redundant owing to changes in {{user-multi}} - Template_talk:User-multi#Uploads Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:50, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:50, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose. It's not redundant. {{User-multi}} cannot be used interchangeably with this template, and cannot duplicate all of the functionality. When User-multi is updated to allow for different display name and user name, then there would be a good argument for implementing Usernameexpand as an instantiation of User-multi with distinct parameters, in order to allow for using the greater functionality available under User-multi, but the two still have considerably different default behaviours. VanIsaacWS Vexcontribs 18:41, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:20, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
- Template:U.S. Open Golf Championships on television (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Non defining. It pretty much duplicates the template Ryder Cup Matches, just listing those shown on television. ...William 14:15, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
The "golf television broadcasts" templates that I created quite easily indicate the exact TV networks that have broadcast the respective tournaments determined by year. It goes well beyond simply "duplicating the main templates" (that's a very lazy and simplistic conclusion to things). If there are articles devoted to said networks' golf TV coverage in general, then the templates of the exact events that they covered over the years is a good companion piece. BornonJune8 (talk) 09:52 p.m., 21 June 2013 (UTC)
- The templates link to articles on the golf tournament not articles about the broadcasts of those golf tournaments. Therefore it duplicates the main templates. Please familiarize yourself with WP:NENAN....William 10:38, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
- delete as redundant. the station hosting the broadcast is a trivial distinction. Frietjes (talk) 18:22, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Kumioko (talk) 19:58, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:20, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
Non defining. It pretty much duplicates the template Ryder Cup Matches, just listing those shown on television. ...William 11:25, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
- delete as redundant. the station hosting the broadcast is a trivial distinction. Frietjes (talk) 18:22, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Kumioko (talk) 19:57, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:20, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
Non defining. It pretty much duplicates the template US Open Championship Tournaments, just listing those shown on television. ...William 11:17, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
- delete as redundant. the station hosting the broadcast is a trivial distinction. Frietjes (talk) 18:22, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Kumioko (talk) 19:57, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.