Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 July 24

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

July 24

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 August 2 Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:57, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox vice-regal (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 August 2 Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:57, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox ministerial office (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:57, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:China National Games Athletics (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Chinese National Games (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

National sport event. So it is unnecessary, non-notable. Banhtrung1 (talk) 15:01, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 22:20, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AxeWound (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

WP:NENAN. Links to total of three relevant articles. Deadbeef 07:46, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:55, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to: Template:Infobox country at games (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only 2 transclusions. This is a youth multi-sport events. It is not known commonly. This templates is unnecessary. Banhtrung1 (talk) 14:40, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.