Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 October 29

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

October 29

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:05, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Albany Great Danes women's basketball season navbox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Nothing links to this template and all of the links in the navbox template are redlinks. Just not needed. -- JoannaSerah (talk) 22:11, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:06, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Pussy Riot member (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This is a template of boileraplate text (with references and categories) used in the lede section of 3 articles on members of the band Pussy Riot. Use of this boilerplate material impedes editors from developing the articles in the usual way, so it should be substed and deleted. -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 17:12, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:20, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox air force wing (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template has been superseded by {{infobox military unit}}. It was previously used exclusively for Swedish air force wings but I have now replaced those instances with infobox military unit. If this gets deleted, please consider also the redirect {{Air Force Wing}}. De728631 (talk) 15:02, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:21, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Integrity (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

WP:NENAN. With just 4 links (one of them a red link) there is just no need for a navigation template. The Banner talk 11:50, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Ensemble has over a dozen albums, and the four articles do not all link to one another without the navbox.--Jax 0677 (talk) 20:45, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It is not the number of albums that counts, it is the number of working links that counts. And the fact that even the three albums don't link to each other, can be solved by normal wikilinking. No need for a navbox. The Banner talk 20:56, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Even though the four original articles can be connected by linking, the navbox is still helpful as a centralized and conspicuous location for all of the links. If you feel that wikilinking is the solution, then maybe you should link the articles together.--Jax 0677 (talk) 03:14, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:24, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Snowball keep (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

WP:SNOW is a conclusion: it is not an argument. Appears to stem from a misunderstanding of both what SNOW signifies and how to apply it. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 11:17, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:25, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Speedy-contested (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Editors who disagree with a speedy tag should just remove it. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 11:16, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:25, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Stub further (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused fork of {{stub}} intended for articles which have sources. This would be better handled by a new parameter in {{asbox}}. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 11:03, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Not needed, any sources not referenced in an article can be listed on a talk page if necessary, this is just messy. -- Patchy1 04:52, 30 October 2012 (UTC) (Member of WP:WSS)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:26, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Spellingminor (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and trivial specialty of {{copyedit}} that was previously deleted. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 10:52, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with and redirect to {{Copy edit}}. Anna|talk 22:42, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
What do you mean by "merge"? Is there content in {{spellingminor}} that you think should be preserved? --Philosopher Let us reason together. 16:39, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Anna edited {{Copy edit/sandbox}} to include a how-to. The how-to was based on {{Spellingminor}}. 96.50.22.205 (talk) 03:14, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Melbourne and Victoria station succession boxes

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:27, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:VictorianStations  (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:ViclinkAndClosedStations  (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:MelbourneStations  (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:MetlinkAndClosedStations  (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:MetlinkAndVlineStations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned custom templates replaced by {{S-rail}} and {{S-line}}. Sw2nd (talk) 03:58, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

delete Frietjes (talk) 18:19, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unused. Rich Farmbrough, 22:59, 5 November 2012 (UTC).[reply]
22:59, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Melbourne and Victoria station infoboxes

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:36, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Vline Railway Station  (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Infobox Victoria closed railway station  (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Infobox Melbourne railway station  (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:MelbourneRailwayStation-Mini  (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Replaced by or an unused wrapper for {{Infobox station}}. Sw2nd (talk) 03:58, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.