Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 June 7

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< June 6 June 8 >

June 7

[edit]

Template:Women's Professional Soccer stadiums

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:18, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Women's Professional Soccer stadiums (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

As of this year the Women's Professional Soccer league ceases to operate, meaning a template listing the stadiums of its current teams is obsolete. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:07, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:FbN M

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:19, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

these are all unnecessary after I merged them with template:Fb rbr t pos, template:Fb rbr result, template:Fb2 rbr t pos, template:Fb3 rbr position, template:Fb4 rbr t pos, template:Fb5 rbr t pos, template:Fb6 rbr t pos, template:Fb7 rbr t pos, template:Fb8 rbr t pos, template:Fb9 rbr t pos, template:Fb10 rbr t pos, template:Fb11 rbr t pos, template:Fb12 rbr t pos, template:Fb14 rbr t pos, template:Fb mls rbr t pos, template:Fb mls east rbr t pos, template:Fb mls west rbr t pos, template:Fb rbr t pos El Salvador, template:Fb rbr t pos Germany11, template:Fb rbr t pos Guatemala, template:Fb rbr t pos Iceland11, template:Fb rbr t pos Italia11, template:Fb rbr t pos Portugal11, template:Fb rbr t pos South Korea12, template:Fb rbr t pos Superettan12, template:Fb suriname hoofdklasse rbr t pos, template:Fb rbr t pos Sweden11, template:Fb rbr t pos SwedenW12. Frietjes (talk) 20:15, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete This whole mess was poorly thought out to start with. Nice clean up job. I wonder whether they couldn't all be merged into one template (an give a more descriptive (& less ambiguous) name like {{soccer}} maybe). JIMp talk·cont 08:25, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    I was thinking the same thing, but this is the first step, then I will see how easy it would be to take the next step. the main issue is the colouring indicates who is promoted/relegated or some sort of placement, and this colouring is different for each league. we could certainly merge them, but we will still need some call to a per-league colour scheme template. Frietjes (talk) 17:42, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:QoDfooter

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:21, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:QoDfooter (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

seems like an unused experiment. 198.102.153.2 (talk) 17:49, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Tabitha Nauser

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:21, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Tabitha Nauser (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navbox does not appear necessary; navigates few links (WP:NENAN).  Gongshow Talk 17:40, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Blackstratblues

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:22, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Blackstratblues (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The only links, including the two redirected album articles, go to the musician's main page; navbox does not appear warranted at this time.  Gongshow Talk 17:33, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Luke City

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:22, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Luke City (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Delete. This navbox was created to go with an article about (as far as I understand) a non-notable YouTube channel or something of the sort. In any case, there's no corresponding article and nothing to navigate. Pichpich (talk) 14:09, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Culture of Bangladesh

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. It appears most of the links are a direct copy of the other template, so there is not much more of value being added. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:24, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Culture of Bangladesh (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Copied from Template:Culture of Bengal, discussed here: Template_talk:Culture_of_Bengal (see last section) Tito Dutta ✉ 05:23, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment Kmzayeem, Culture of Bengal doesn't need "national symbols", and neither does this template. Bengal is a cultural/historical matter, and so it the scope of the original template. If you can substantiate a cultural identity for Bangladesh separate from the cultural identity of Bengal, then do so, please, before you start spreading ignorance and misinformation. This template is a copy of another template without any substantial change, if any, and currently has no scope of use. BTW, voting doesn't count here, validity of argument does (where the "regional state" argument is already seriously invalid, because Bengal is not a regional state). Voting twice counts even less. Aditya(talk • contribs) 06:49, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep I must say that I'm somewhat confused as to what template is really nominated here. That said, keep Culture of Bangladesh, as every sovereign nation should have a Culture of article as well as articles on all those other sub-topics. Some of the Bengal topics might be legitimate links for the Culture of Bangladesh template. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 03:40, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment It's nominated here because it's an exact copy of another template, and it declares a scope which has almost nothing to do with the nominated template. A Culture of Bangladesh template should be kept when it addresses the Culture of Bangladesh, not by just changing the title of another slightly corresponding template. Templates are copied because of their wikicodes, not content. Aditya(talk • contribs) 04:34, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Plagiarism We spent hours (and days) to create this template, there has been multiple versions of this template, and it has been directly and completely copied! The newer template is noting but a rename! --Tito Dutta ✉ 05:05, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2012_June_7&oldid=1138535937"