Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 April 6

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 6

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:56, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Peoples of the world (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Doubtfull if this is a usefull template. Night of the Big Wind talk 12:41, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Consensus that the template was too complex and so inhibited editor involvement. SilkTork ✔Tea time 09:06, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Sar (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Over-engineered boilerplate generator which adds bullet points to a see also section. It is vastly simpler both conceptually and technically simply to take the article title, stick the words "Outline of" or "Index of" in front of it, and to manually construct the links than it it to have to remember this template exists, remember its syntax, and have said template perform a half-dozen operations to spit out the three bullets it's primarily used for. Pretty much all additional functionality is overkill, best handled by manual editing. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 11:56, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The result of the discussion was delete after replacement with {{Sar}}, {{Portal}}, and {{Wikipedia books}}.

Therefore if a decision is made to delete Template:Sar, the discussion of the deletion of Template:Satop will need to be reopened.  Buaidh  18:49, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Well, no. That {{satop}} is still in the holding pen for deletion doesn't change anything about this nomination. It simply means that this template cannot be deleted until the work to remove {{satop}} has been completed. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 07:07, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was redirect to {{Osmrelation-inline}} or move {{Osmrelation-inline}} to {{Osmrelation}}Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:56, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Osmrelation (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Completely non-standard large box cluttering the external links section and making the impression that this is a WMF project. Per Wikipedia:External links: "Do not create large, graphical templates for non-WMF websites, even if these websites are also wikis." Eleassar my talk 09:21, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:52, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cite DMPN (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only one transclusion, easily replaced by cite book Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:51, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 07:06, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:W-screen-static (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to {{w-screen|static=true}}. — This, that, and the other (talk) 02:21, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:37, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Fooers from Algeria (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and unnecessary since this is covered by {{Fooian fooers}}. Pichpich (talk) 00:58, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.