Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 November 4

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

November 4

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. No objections lodged. Redrose64 (talk) 11:22, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Atlanta buildings (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The template is a collection of buildings which have nothing in common. By the author's definition they are buildings which do not fit into the Atlanta landmarks or Atlanta skyscraper templates. Buildings which are "left over" are not a group which makes sense. The category "Buildings and structures in Atlanta" serves this purpose. Also the template is present on only a couple of pages, which may be an indication that it is not useful.Keizers (talk) 14:59, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was deleteGFOLEY FOUR!07:08, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:English criminal law (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template appears to be redundant to a better designed template, namely, Template:English criminal law navbox. It does not appear to be used on any articles, and I can't see why anyone would want to use it when the other template is available, which is less invasive and has more links which are more relevant (i.e. Template:English criminal law hasn't been kept up to date and it would be a waste of time to bring up to date). James500 (talk) 22:21, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was deleteGFOLEY FOUR!07:08, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox GMJHL team (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused, articles are using "infobox Pro hockey team". Frietjes (talk) 20:30, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was deleteGFOLEY FOUR!07:08, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Friends season episode list (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Infobox Friends season 1 episode list (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

old, unused, and replaced by a different navigation method. Frietjes (talk) 20:19, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was deleteGFOLEY FOUR!07:09, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Football UEFA Euro Championship (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused and probably redundant to some "international football competition" box. Frietjes (talk) 20:18, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was deleteGFOLEY FOUR!07:09, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox EIHL team (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused and redundant to template:infobox Pro hockey team. I was going to deploy this, but then noticed that over half the teams were just using "infobox Pro hockey team" instead and the other half were using hardcoded tables. so i converted the hardcoded tables to use "infobox Pro hockey team". Frietjes (talk) 20:15, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy Delete  Ronhjones  (Talk) 01:00, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:William Hill (bookmaker) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template violates WP:NOTLINK and currently only links to one article. Armbrust Talk to me about my editsreview 19:25, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was procedural close. Userboxes should be nominated at Miscellany for deletion even in template namespace. (NAC) Armbrust Talk to me about my editsreview 19:31, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:User no-0 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Category:User no-0 was speedily deleted and 0-level categories have been deleted per consensus (see Wikipedia:User categories for discussion/Archive/March 2007#0-level categories, part 2 & 3), so shouldn't their corresponding templates be deleted as well? Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 17:33, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was deleteGFOLEY FOUR!07:10, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Bilateral relations organisation (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused and we have template:infobox organisation, of which this appears to be a fork. Frietjes (talk) 17:30, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was deleteGFOLEY FOUR!07:10, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Bangladesh division (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Bangladesh has 7 divisions, all of which are using template:infobox settlement directly, rather than this wrapper. Frietjes (talk) 17:27, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keepGFOLEY FOUR!07:11, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Mexico U20 Squad 1993 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

It should not be created since its not a men's tournament. There is also many red links. GoPurple'nGold24 05:51, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. SchuminWeb (Talk) 01:20, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Muslim Name (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unclear purpose, just one transclusion, creates an external link. Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:35, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. SchuminWeb (Talk) 01:18, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:1998 K-1 Events (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

also nominating:

both templates are full of redirects and are thus pointless. LibStar (talk) 02:00, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:43, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.