Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 March 2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 2

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_Zero 19:34, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:SCOTUS link (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphan template that does nothing but insert a piped link: [[Supreme Court of the United States|United States Supreme Court]] The same can (and generally is) achieved by linking to the redirect United States Supreme Court. Although this is mostly harmless, it's prone to being confused with Template:SCOTUSLinks. See also Template:Scotuslink, discussed below. TJRC (talk) 20:16, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_Zero 19:38, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Scotuslink (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphan template that does nothing but insert a piped link: [[Supreme Court of the United States|United States Supreme Court]] The same can (and generally is) achieved by linking to the redirect United States Supreme Court. Although this is mostly harmless, it's prone to being confused with Template:SCOTUSLinks. TJRC (talk) 20:06, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:29, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Prof of Mirza (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

All links direct to the same article. Hence not needed yet until separate articles are created Peaceworld111 (talk) 13:48, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as unnecessary and confusing. The template is used on two pages, one of which is the page to which all the links point (confusing) and the other is a related page where a single link to the Prophecies page in a "See also" section would suffice. — Bility (talk) 01:11, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:33, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Samuel Hershaw (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navbox that had only two links; I removed one because is was to naked and I'm pretty sure this guy didn't invent nudism. So proposing deletion because not everything needs a navbox. c y m r u . l a s s (talk me, stalk me) 07:46, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. There was some rather dodgy wikilinking going on in the Hershaw article (now removed) - this is probably to show respectability and notability. Either that, or we're spoiling someone in Year 10's homework on Wikipedia article creation... Peridon (talk) 22:26, 2 March 2011 (UTC). Peridon (talk) 22:26, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Keep with no consensus for renaming. I will redirect {{Whales}} to {{Cetacea}} though. GƒoleyFour01:32, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Whale (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template is useless. Aris riyanto (talk) 11:11, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:34, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox MASH character (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, redundant to Template:Infobox character Axem Titanium (talk) 01:37, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.