Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 September 11
September 11
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted as G4 (discussion). NAC. — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 19:08, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
- Template:Harriet Harman (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
We had this B4, its not needed at all. The additions are also tangentially connected. We have to my memory deleted this at least twice, previous user, as I remember was blocked under the identity. If the community again supports this deletion the template should be salted. Off2riorob (talk) 19:27, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
- Probably UNDUE, drawing attention to a tiny fraction of Harman's career. Also worrying that the author is an SPA. Anyway, as you say this is recreation of deleted content, so I've deleted it as G4 because the content was substantially the same. If it's recreated again ping me and I'll salt it. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward: not at work) - talk 10:34, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Speedy delete per T2 Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:41, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
The template consists solely of the words, "March 3,1983(age 28)", which would only apply to a few people and is not very useful. Seems to have been created for use in the Maite Perroni article, but it has since been removed. It has no parameters and is not transcluded on any page. cymru lass (hit me up)⁄(background check) 16:16, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
- Delete as hardcoded and any use is transient (would have to change every year). — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 01:59, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
- Delete per nom EmanWilm (talk) 05:31, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
- Delete as unused and useless. PC78 (talk) 13:33, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.