Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 April 4

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 4

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:03, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Harriet Harman (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This appears to be of little or no benefit to the reader, are we to have templates for each and every politician? All the links (or almost all) are already linked in the body of the article. Off2riorob (talk) 18:43, 4 April 2010 (UTC) Off2riorob (talk) 18:43, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Inlcude Template:Peter Mandelson as well? ninety:one 16:52, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:03, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Multirow begin (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Multirow end (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Two uses, redundant with other column templates. -— Gadget850 (Ed) talk 14:48, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:03, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Further reading (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Few uses; entirely redundant with {{Refbegin}} which has more features. -— Gadget850 (Ed) talk 13:27, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:03, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Quang Binh (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned, no sign of use.. Avicennasis @ 08:27, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:03, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Quantum Frequency (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned template, no sign of use, sitting since June 2008... Avicennasis @ 08:20, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Merge Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:03, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Inuse-elapsed (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:In use (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Inuse-elapsed with Template:In use.
I propose to merge Inuse-elapsed into In use. In other words, to add the timestamp to In use. It is a useful function, and there is no need why the main template shouldn't have it. Debresser (talk) 06:30, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:03, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Italian people (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

As stated in a first nomination, there are a number of templates that make the cumbersome and ugly "Italian people" template redundant, from Template:Italian language to Template:Italian diaspora ecc. The original nomination was closed as 'keep' because of the votes of what were later revealed to be sockpuppets of blocked User:Brunodam. Deusdemona (talk) 02:52, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ma tu odi gli italiani, deusdemona! Cancellami pure, demonio malvagio, tanto "chi la dura la vince" alla lunga....il bene sempre finisce per vincere sul male, ricordatelo.--Sett19 (talk) 01:01, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Anzi, merda galleggia e oro affonda. ―AoV² 04:00, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.