Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 June 11

< June 10	June 12 >

June 11

Template:Exfumador

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:47, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Exfumador (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Useless template with just two userboxes in it WOSlinker (talk) 23:32, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WPIPNA

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:48, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WPIPNA (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused Wikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America template Page uses code directly, so no need for template. WOSlinker (talk) 23:22, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox France station

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete now that all transclusions have been replaced. RL0919 (talk) 18:22, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox France station (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template is redundant to {{Infobox station}}, and is only used on a limited number of pages. As a demonstration, this edit, shows how this regionalized infobox can be converted to the more generic station infobox. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:10, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Infobox station seems to be a good substitute. -- WOSlinker (talk) 09:46, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 12:34, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. - Darwinek (talk) 21:01, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Whoa! While you are all voting to delete, what you are actually saying is to replace. Big difference. This template is actively in use and should not be deleted - yet. I have replaced hundreds of custom station infoboxes, so I have already been through this. Lets see some action before deletion. Secondarywaltz (talk) 17:45, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Convention is always that such infoboxes are replaced before deletion. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 18:15, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - Good! I have seen so many cases where deletionist, with no background in the subject, have overwhelmed the vote. Incidentally, this is similar to what I am trying to achieve all across Canada. Secondarywaltz (talk)
    - I converted the lot, so this can be safely deleted. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:46, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Navbox with images

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 (talk) 19:41, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Navbox with images (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not very widely used alternative version of {{Navbox}}. WOSlinker (talk) 22:25, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It appears as though this was created back in 2008 and never really caught on. If there is a particular desirable feature in this navbox frontend I don't see any reason why that couldn't be merged with the one of the other more standard infoboxes. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:29, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:HFC Haarlem squad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:48, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:HFC Haarlem squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This should be a fairly uncontroversial nomination. Basically this football club no longer exists, and so there is no need to have a 'current squad' template for it. Giant Snowman 20:33, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 20:35, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Penthouse Pets of 1972

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete per prior discussion Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:47, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Penthouse Pets of 1972 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navigation box with only one active link, therefore useless. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 17:18, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or userfy, no reason why this couldn't be recreated if/when the articles actually exist. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:52, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I am striking my comment since there appears to be a broader discussion here. I suggest closing this discussion and merging it with the June 12, 2010 discussion. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 05:21, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Greenlandic divisions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 (talk) 19:45, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Greenlandic divisions (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to {{Infobox settlement}}; only three (3) article-space transclusions. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 16:10, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant -Per nom. Sermersooq shows how infobox municipality deals with it. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 16:51, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I converted all four, given the small number. I am happy to revert these changes, or replace them with something else if an alternative outcome is desired. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 16:57, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Gremlins

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Underpopulated navbox. RL0919 (talk) 19:50, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Gremlins (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Large template for 4 items, unlikely to grow. Jayjg ^(talk) 02:34, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Helps navigate through the series--TheMovieBuff (talk) 16:10, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Navbox templates are not needed for only five articles. It's almost certain that every article this would be transcluded on would already provide ample navigation between these topics. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 09:38, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete with only two films, the navigation functionality is weak. No reason why this sort of navigation can't be addressed using the "see also" section of each article. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:51, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, does not justify a navbox. Axem Titanium (talk) 13:45, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Abkhaz district

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 (talk) 19:55, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Abkhaz district (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This is a fairly limited template, and is largely redundant to {{Infobox district}}. There were only about 6 transclusions, so I replaced them, but I am more than happy to revert these changes if there is consensus for an alternative solution. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:57, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 16:19, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant -Per nom. . Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 16:51, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.