Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 August 22

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

August 22

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. JPG-GR (talk) 21:11, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Football kit/pattern list (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

In order to provide the most complete listing of kit patterns, new patterns should be categorized appropriately and viewed through Commons categories. This will help reduce the number of places where the patterns must be linked and generally help to keep things more orderly. Udeezy (talk) 23:42, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete both. Airplaneman 02:56, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:S-line/WMATA left/Purple (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Also nominating its complement, {{S-line/WMATA right/Purple}}.

Unused succession templates for a line whose stations (other than termini) don't have articles yet, and is at least 6 years in the future. —Train2104 (talk · contribs · count · email) 23:11, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Airplaneman 02:56, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:RichardandKahlan (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused WuhWuzDat 17:51, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

MLB yearly infobox variants

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was redirect Template:MLB yearly infobox alt to Template:MLB yearly infobox and Template:MLB yearly infobox-pre1969 alt to Template:MLB yearly infobox-pre1969, since the requested changes seem to have been made. Airplaneman 03:04, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:MLB yearly infobox alt (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:MLB yearly infobox-pre1969 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:MLB yearly infobox-pre1969 alt (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

"alt" versions are redundant forks of {{MLB yearly infobox}}/{{MLB yearly infobox-pre1969}}, whose documentation says "Alternate version with General Manager included". That parameter should be added as an optional part of the parent template.

{{MLB yearly infobox-pre1969}} is redundant fork of {{MLB yearly infobox}} and was "was created to remove the inclusion of divisions for seasons prior to 1969". Again, this should be handled by the parent templates. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 14:22, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Airplaneman 02:39, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Welling United F.C. squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Rarely updated template with just the three blue links. EchetusXe 11:28, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: does not link enough articles to be deemed useful. BigDom 12:42, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Airplaneman 02:38, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Redditch United F.C. squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Full completely of red links and is years out of date. EchetusXe 10:12, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Airplaneman 02:24, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Life in Pakistan (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

We have Template:Pakistan topics to explain whatever there is in Pakistan. I can't understand the aim of this template. Farjad0322 (talk) 08:43, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Airplaneman 02:23, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DisneyVillains (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

A similar template has been created before and was deleted for inconsistency, therefore this one, follows the same criteria and should also be deleted. Esb94 (talk) 02:53, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Airplaneman 02:45, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:World Universities Debating Ranking (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Given that this templates source is questionable with regard to being a reliable source (see Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive_72#European Universities Debating Championship and it's sources and Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 56#www.debating.net) and these rankings are not officially recognized by the World Universities Debating Council this should be deleted as one persons OR. Codf1977 (talk) 06:35, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Airplaneman 02:18, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WP RSS (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.