Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2009 November 25

< November 24	November 26 >

November 25

Template:Gpotato Portal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:48, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Gpotato Portal (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template isn't needed as it duplicates the purpose of a "see also" section. It also causes a formatting problem as it creates a self-referring black links on each of the pages it is intended to go on. Them From Space 22:56, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Appears to be just a list of links, which should be created as regular text rather than a template. --RL0919 (talk) 17:46, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:SBO Custom Guitars

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:58, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:SBO Custom Guitars (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not familiar with TFD, but the company associated with these products has been deleted from wikipedia. The remaining blue links in the template are up for PROD, and will most likely be deleted. TheWeakWilled (T * G) 21:17, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not enough working links to justify a navbox even if the remaining bluelink articles are kept. --RL0919 (talk) 17:46, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Australian Muscle Cars

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:58, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Australian Muscle Cars (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Has been abandoned for sometime and does not link anywhere. Falcadore (talk) 09:10, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Navbox with no links. Willing to change to keep if someone wants to adopt this and create links for the entries, assuming there are places to link them. (I've adopted nominated navboxes before myself, but this one isn't my cup of tea.) --RL0919 (talk) 17:53, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Vacation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. JPG-GR (talk) 07:07, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Vacation (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to template {{Holiday}}. The US=yes parameter in {{Holiday}} negates the purpose of having a second template (use of word "vacation" instead of "holiday"). Mûĸĸâĸûĸâĸû 08:50, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect - Rather than delete, why not just redirect vacation to holiday? -- WOSlinker (talk) 16:33, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, the template currently uses Template:holiday anyway and typing {{vacation}} is probably more convenient than {{holiday|US=yes}}. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 19:08, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep a useful template, and a common-sense name for those of us in the US who aren't used to calling time off for "holiday". Them From Space 23:00, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Redundancy is only a minimal issue for userspace templates, and avoiding disputes over different varieties of English is a good reason for it. — Gavia immer (talk) 00:45, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep per WP:ENGVAR. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:00, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Gravitation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was redirect to {{Theories of gravitation}} Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:58, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Gravitation (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template. Ruslik_Zero 08:08, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Don't see any use for this template. Materialscientist (talk) 10:08, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete then recreate as a redirect to template:Theories of gravitation as a {{R from shortcut}} 76.66.197.2 (talk) 15:09, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
An alternative would be just redirect and not bother with nominating here :-) - no harm in the content. Materialscientist (talk) 01:40, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Well... could someone then WP:BOLDly redirect it then? An early closure would be needed too. 76.66.202.219 (talk) 06:00, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.