Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2009 November 24

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

November 24

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Keep Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:15, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Buleleng Regency (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Nothing but redlinks. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 06:16, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is okay to delete, if sometime future anybody wants to re-create the template, the equivalent in Indonesian wiki is Templat:Kabupaten Buleleng. Reindra (talk) 01:05, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:17, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Pieces-style (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Incoherent information and ugly design. Maybe better to scrap it than spend time making sense of this? Kleinzach 00:55, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Are red links a reason for deletion? How is a rationale apparent in a template? Hyacinth (talk) 02:10, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The template is fairly old and was based on a template by someone else, meaning that its design is even older. Hyacinth (talk) 02:11, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.