Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 46
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page. |
Archive 40 | ← | Archive 44 | Archive 45 | Archive 46 | Archive 47 | Archive 48 | → | Archive 50 |
Leuven Cricket Club
Hi, I am contesting the speedy deletion of Leuven Cricket Club, and request you to restore it kindly. The page is for an official cricket club affiliated to the Belgian Cricket Federation. There is no personal propaganda material there. Just because somebody else had made a not so notable page earlier, does not mean the current page was also bad. I was expecting feedback to improve it and in any case, I see that it is better than many other club pages. Many such club pages already exist on wikipedia: http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Category:Lancashire_League_cricket_clubs http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Accrington_Cricket_Club http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Nelson_Cricket_Club http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Todmorden_Cricket_Club -Davalumni (talk) 13:16, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leuven Cricket Club, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user JohnCD (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:35, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
Meghan Chavalier
I am not sure why Meghan Chavalier's Wikipedia page was deleted. She is a very notable person in the world of entertainment having released two published books and multiple cds. She is also widely know for her work in the adult film industry having made over 175 movies and being the first transsexual contract player in that industry. She is also widely known for her activism with the LGBT Community with her Stopping The Hate Organization. I believe she is more than notable for Wikipedia. -98.223.249.86 (talk) 14:55, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meghan Chavalier, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Salvio giuliano (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:33, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
Dan_Vaillancourt
Dan Vaillancourt is a well-known regional artist. I have a number of news articles to back up this claim and will add them to the Wiki entry if it is restored. In addition, he is the host of a popular online cooking show that has been featured on the front page of YouTube. I request that this page be undeleted. Thank you. -Jheditorials (talk) 16:30, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:31, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
Hall High Chess Team
The Hall High Chess Team is the primier high school chess team in the state of Connecticut and thus certainly merits an article. It was unjustly deleted by an admin who probably knows nothing whatsoever about the topic, and, moreover, doesn't care. -Kiernanmc (talk) 20:19, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:30, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
- ...and is now under discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hall High School Chess Team. JohnCD (talk) 20:10, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
High Impact Halo
Page was previously deleted as per Wikipedia:WEB in 2006. Page was recreated in 2007 and future creations of the page were blocked. Page should be recreated properly as per Wikipedia:Web noting the valuable historical significance of the website in question. Website in question is notable as per attention from Bungie, Halo.bungie.org, and the attention of over 16 thousand Halo (series) fans (see HIH member list). Page falls under the same situation as Halo.bungie.org, as both sites are extremely similar both in content and in recognition. Encyclopedic documentation for the site is long overdue. -Matortheeternal (talk) 05:32, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
Not done. This was deleted after a deletion discussion at WP:Articles for deletion/High Impact Halo so, as stated at the top of this page, it will not be undeleted here. I suggest you make a userspace draft and then approach user Mailer diablo (talk), the admin who closed the discussion; if he does not agree, you can take it to WP:Deletion review. I do not think the versions deleted in 2006 will be any help in making an acceptable article such as you describe. JohnCD (talk) 14:23, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
Ed Alleyne-Johnson
The article was deleted due to the musician failing to meet the criteria at WP:MUSICBIO (see AfD discussion). However, the musician has had an album on the British music chart and therefore meets the criteria at WP:MUSICBIO.[1] -194.176.105.135 (talk) 11:21, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
- If that's true then I wouldn't be opposed to allowing the article to be recreated but the version deleted was a poorly sourced BLP. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:13, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
- The link provided above provides the evidence -- you'll need to click "view album". --194.176.105.135 (talk) 13:28, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
Not done and will not be done As already stated, if a new, properly referenced article is created from scratch, and it meets all requirements for remaining on Wikipedia, it will be evaluated on its merits. The version that was deleted will not be undeleted (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 13:32, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
- Wow, I misread Ron Ritzman's reply and though he meant if my statement was true he wouldn't mind it being undeleted rather than recreated. There was really no need to be quite so pissy about it. --194.176.105.135 (talk) 14:47, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
Boris Mavashev
reasoning -IljaMoser (talk) 14:30, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
Not done Article is not deleted - it requires some massive work to repair, but it was undeleted back in June (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 14:43, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
Jeremy_Robinson
Article was originally deleted because "BLP that has been unsourced since 2007. No coverage found other than local news. But there is a lot of coverage for Robinson and his books beyond local news (Booklist, Library Journal, etc). The page just needs to be updated. -Veago87 (talk) 14:55, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. I will notify user Michig (talk), who proposed it, in case he wishes to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion. What the article needs is independent references to establish notability - those on the article are only his website and his publisher's website. (The third, labelled "an interview", just goes back to the publisher's website). JohnCD (talk) 20:37, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
File:FgwNewcoloursatPAD.jpg
File deleted without reason, I took the picture and as such I own the copyright of this image and as such it is freely available to be used on wiki as per wiki policies, Magog the Ogre has overstepped authority. -Fkmd (talk) 18:51, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
Done. There was no overstepping of authority. The image's description page didn't mention who the copyright holder was, just a claim that it was licensed freely. If you could, please clarify on the description page that you took the picture yourself to avoid this from happening again in the future. — ξxplicit 19:50, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
- Er, can we delete this again please? I've undeleted the Commons version, File:London Paddington railway station FGW Mk3.jpg and added the info, so no need for the en version to remain. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:50, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
File:El nacional stadium.jpg
I received the Orphaned non-free image notice in my talk page when the image was removed by an IP user. So I quickly put it back into the article. However, it was quickly removed and replaced by User:Suckermonster and I received a second Orphaned non-free image notice in my talk page. So I proceeded to—again—put the file back into the article but AGAIN User:Suckermonster undid my edit. I don't understand why User:Suckermonster replaced the File:El nacional stadium.jpg with a render of the new stadium when that render was already in a lower section of the article AND the new stadium has already been completed thus making the render obsolete. Had I known the image (El nacional stadium.jpg) was removed a third time, I would've put it back in and asked him why he kept removing it without an explanation. -MicroX (talk) 21:19, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
- Please attempt to resolve the issue with Suckermonster (talk · contribs) first. In general, we can only handle uncontroversial requests here. Such an image can only be restored if we are sure it will be used. Contact me with any questions, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 03:44, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
Done - now restored per Ron Ritzman and Mtking. If it becomes a problem again, be sure to bring up your reasoning on the article's talk page. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 13:34, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
sakthimicro system
- Sakthimicro system · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
- Sakthi_micro · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
- Sakthimicro · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Sakthimicro system it training center in sri lanka. found in google search engine first and listing on google auto suggest . I request that this page be undeleted. Thank you -112.135.112.200 (talk) 12:45, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
Not done. Wikipedia is not a business listing directory. This has been put in many times under different titles, but there is no indication that it is notable enough to have an article in an encyclopedia - see the WP:FAQ/Organizationsand WP:CORP. JohnCD (talk) 13:00, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
Professor Ravi Kant
Professor Ravi kant belongs to a group who has come from village and has shining track depite social disadvantages. It is short story of triumph over social established biase. Deletion will look like continued disregard of the inspiring message that education can change even the most disadvantaged. -Ravibina (talk) 14:46, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is not here to provide inspiring messages or inspirational stories. We are a reference encyclopedia. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:19, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
Podcast Beyond
This article is part of the IGN page and I feel that it is a very large topic. Podcast Beyond has grown into a pretty large gaming phenomonon and the page should stay on Wikipedia to inform people about it. -Tortilene1 (talk) 17:38, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
Not doneThis was deleted in 2010 after a deletion discussion at WP:Articles for deletion/Podcast Beyond for lack of notability, which is not a matter of opinion but needs to be demonstrated by showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources, and re-created and deleted again recently. If you think you can find independent sources to show notability, approach the most recent deleting administrator, user Peridon (talk); then, if your concerns are not addressed, you can go to WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 13:07, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
I am requesting this article be reinstated to Wikipedia. The Rebel Legion is an international Star Wars costuming organization created by, of and for people interested in creating costumes from the Star Wars mythos. Persons come here from all over the world to research, create, build and improve costumes in a place where costumers with similar passions share skills, tips and ideas. Jedi, Rebel Pilots, Troopers, Princesses and even Wookiees.... we've got them all. The Rebel Legion first appeared in mid-1999 and in the years since its formation, the group has grown from a few dozen Rebel costumers that talked to each other on the internet, to becoming the premier Rebel costuming group in the Star Wars community. Our membership is constantly increasing, and we have established our own presence in the world. We are recognized by George Lucas and all of his staff as the leading "Star Wars GOOD GUY" costuming organization on the planet. We have
- 30 Bases in North America & Canada
- 8 Bases and 1 Outpost in Europe
- 1 Base and 2 Outpost in South America
- 2 Bases and 5 Outposts in Asia/Pacific Area
This represents an increase over last year due to the expansion into more areas of the country and the world. While it is not sponsored by Lucasfilm Ltd., Lucasfilm recognizes the Rebel Legion as a premiere volunteer Rebel costuming group. Star Wars, its characters, costumes, and all associated items are the intellectual property of Lucasfilm. Rebel Legion members appear at public venues, such as conventions, parades, fundraisers for charity, visit children’s hospitals, support educational and science centers, as well as a wide variety of other events. Our Mission is to bring Star Wars costume enthusiasts together by giving them a collective realm in which to operate. To promote the quality and improvement of Star Wars Costumes, and to follow the lead of Lucasfilm Ltd. By giving back to the community through charity work and volunteerism. We value each member regardless of gender, race, religion, creed, sexual orientation, nationality, or physical handicap. We also value the goals set down by LFL by giving all we can to the community. We have been recognized frequently in the Star Wars Newletter, "BANTHA TRACKS", have been featured at various functions including STAR WARS WEEKENDS at Disney, and have worked with Lucas and his staff on multiple conventions to make sure that the persons attending have a memorable experience. We are not the 501st and even though we work closely with our sister organization, we are a separate entity altogether.
If the reasons above arent enough reason to have the REBEL LEGION reinstated to WIKIPEDIA, please feel free to contact me personally and I will give you more infomration considering I am one of the Base Executive Officers for Virginia and West Virginia and the Merchandising Officer for the entire Rebel Legion.
Thanks Joel Webne Freedom Base Executive Officer Rebel Legion Merchandising Officer -71.251.228.52 (talk) 18:13, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
Not done - article was deleted after an AfD discussion that, though it had only 4 participants, extended over most of the month of May. This followed up on one proposed deletion that was undone as a refund after it had expired and been deleted. There's been plenty of time and opportunity given to show that this niche business could be shown notable in sources. It was not. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 04:06, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
Edgar Salli
Player has now played at professional level for AS Monaco FC in a league fixture -TheBigJagielka (talk) 00:43, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
Not done. As this was deleted after Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edgar Salli, you should approach user Joe Decker (talk), the admin who closed that discussion, and show him a reliable source to confirm that Salli has played at professional level. JohnCD (talk) 15:59, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
Tommaso Ceccarelli
sorry I made a mistake, this page can not be removed.thanks before -Aquilotti (talk) 01:39, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
- This page has not been deleted - it is under discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tommaso Ceccarelli and that is where you should comment. JohnCD (talk) 13:10, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
File:PMKM chapter1 cover.png
File was originally deleted under WP:CSD#G5 (Unused non-free file). - Feinoha Talk, My master 20:43, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
Done. — ξxplicit 00:54, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
tyler sniffen
It gives a great biography of Tyler Sniffen and is 100% accurate -96.238.136.115 (talk) 22:40, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
Not done We do not allow attack pages here. LadyofShalott 01:19, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
Jason Zucker
Request to restore edit history -Dolovis (talk) 23:14, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
Not done The prior "article" under this name was nonsense about him being a sex machine and disco pioneer, and was deleted as an attack page. There is nothing of substance to restore. --Orange Mike | Talk 01:11, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
Blood Rash
I am really working hard on this game and by the deletion of my page you are showing extreme disrespect for my work. When this game is released you will see why a wiki article is up. Please re-post my article. <spamlink and advertisement removed>. Thank you for your time I hope you reconsider the existence of my page. -BloodRash (talk) 00:52, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
Not done When your game is released and if it becomes notable, then maybe we can have an article about it but it will need to be written by somebody other then you. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 04:33, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
Four requests
-℥nding·start 04:14, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
-℥nding·start 04:14, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
-℥nding·start 04:14, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
I would like to be emailed all of these articles. I was working on them when I was a noob to Wikipedia, and they got removed, as they were previously deleted. I would like to work on them now in my sandbox and try to get them good to go into the main space. Or if you'd rather just put them straight into my sandbox, that would be fine too. User:Ending-start/Sandbox/THE NAME OF THE DELETED ARTICLE. Thanks, -℥nding·start 04:14, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
- Why is nobody going to do this for me...? ℥nding·start 20:36, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
Done Probably no one did it before because it is four articles and so four times the work. Being AFD deletions you have an uphill battle to get them back to article space. Anyway I have emailed wikitext and attribution history to you. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:43, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
King Chilla
I wish to have the opportunity to fix the Unsourced BLP problem within the page. Thanks! -King Chilla (talk) 07:14, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
- But how will you fix the conflict of interest problem, and the notability problem? (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:05, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
- The COI concern is minimal as User:KingChilla has no edits to the deleted article. We solve the problem by allowing any logged in editor who is not the subject and has no connection to the subject to write a new sourced article. As far as the notability issue is concerned, that could be addressed at AFD if such an article is created and if someone elects to nominate it for deletion. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:21, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
- Okay - understood - thanks. King Chilla (talk) 14:40, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
Done feel free to properly reference or start an AFD. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:48, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
- Okay - understood - thanks. King Chilla (talk) 14:40, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
- The COI concern is minimal as User:KingChilla has no edits to the deleted article. We solve the problem by allowing any logged in editor who is not the subject and has no connection to the subject to write a new sourced article. As far as the notability issue is concerned, that could be addressed at AFD if such an article is created and if someone elects to nominate it for deletion. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:21, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
Markham Street Films
Permission for use of content at http://www.markhamstreetfilms.com under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 license received from representative for the site in ticket 2011081110014751. -– Adrignola talk 18:57, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
- I have notified Wikipedia:Copyright problems in hopes that someone with copyright experience will take a look. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 12:29, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
Not done, spam article posted by "the intern". Guy (Help!) 17:19, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
Matthew Zavala
My friend and I decided to make each other's wikipedia page. I was on video chat with him as I wrote it, but it was deleted as soon as I saved it. I do not know why it was deleted. -Guitarnoob (talk) 07:56, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
Done - the page has been restored to your userspace at User:Guitarnoob/Matthew Zavala. --Bongwarrior (talk) 08:22, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
Council for Aid to Education
Council for Aid to Education|This is a notable organization, as shown by 2,500 hits on Google Books, and many others on the web. I cannot see what was on the deleted page, it might have been a messy stub, but it should be quite easy to transform it into a notable stub, at the very least. (sources: [2], [3], [4]... ) -Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 19:07, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Piotrus/Council for Aid to Education. LadyofShalott 23:22, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
Kris Carr
Was speedied under Wikipedia:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion#A7 on August 30, 2007. Is now the subject of a five page feature in The New York Times Magazine https://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/14/magazine/kris-carr-crazy-sexy-entrepreneur.html See also http://crazysexylife.com/press/ -User:Fred Bauder Talk 18:27, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
Done, but the 2007 article as restored is eminently A7-worthy; will you now update it from the new sources? JohnCD (talk) 20:55, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
- I'll run it by the gender-gap mailing list. I must confess lack of interest in the subject myself. User:Fred Bauder Talk 22:12, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
Mayou Trikerioti
No reasoning given. -Petros Karas (talk) 20:31, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
Not done. This was deleted after a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mayou Trikerioti so it will not be restored here, and I have deleted your re-creation as a repost of deleted material. If you consider the discussion was wrongly decided, or you have new information, you should approach user Cirt (talk), the administrator who closed the deletion discussion: then, if your concerns are not addressed, you can go to WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 20:51, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
Ahmed Okasha Addaly
this page is valuable and contains realiable data -DS success (talk) 00:36, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
Not done Valuable? It's a résumé of a person who clearly does not meet notability requirements on Wikipedia. Reliable? Sure, it's self-sourced to the corporate websites of where he worked. This is not LinkedIn ... it's an encyclopedia. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:47, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
Geoffrey Pugen
Without discussion, the entire article of the artist Geoffrey Pugen was deleted for sections that were alleged to be advertising. Please consider undeleting the page so that through discussion any inappropriate material can be corrected. -WalterVStolzing (talk) 01:14, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. If you think a legitimate article can be written about this person, then do so; but drop all the smarmy press-release artist's-agent stuff which got the last version deleted. Don't use peacock words like "accomplished"; don't quote gush from exhibit catalogs by gallery personnel; etc. Just the facts, please; as straightforward as an Edward Hopper. -Orange Mike | Talk 18:47, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
Vivek Kumar Pandey
No valid reason for deletion. Article can be modified by the wikipedia contributors to fulfill any need to make it notable one -117.211.83.243 (talk) 07:06, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Vivek_Kumar_Pandey, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:06, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
Kansas one room schools
One rooms schools in Kansas history contributed to the early development of the state. While many one room schools have been preserved, many are becoming extinct through a lack of interest or knowledge. -MadameGraffigny (talk) 10:37, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
Not done It was not deleted, it was moved to Kansas one room school. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:44, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
File:Nonsan logo.jpg
This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Nonsan. -Zundark (talk) 11:39, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
Done. — ξxplicit 17:37, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
User:B41joss
reasoning -B41joss (talk) 14:36, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
I will reword the article so that it will not promote the company in any way. I am sure that I will remain unbiased in my article so that it does not promote Loretta LaRoche Productions.
Not done As a massive violation of WP:PROMO and WP:NOTDIRECTORY, and the fact that even userpages belong to the Wikipedia project, this cannot be restored. The company does not meet the notability requirements of Wikipedia, and I have grave concerns about conflict of interest. This userpage was deleted twice within 48hrs; do not recreate it. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 17:01, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
- They recreated it - flagged and tagged it for deletion again. MikeWazowski (talk) 17:38, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
- Despite the instruction above, this was created for a fourth time. I have blocked the user as an advertising-only account. JohnCD (talk) 17:54, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
Alice offley
This article about a musician failed at AfD because it was a little short of notability. I want to userfy it so I can maintain it for a few weeks. I believe the press surrounding a forthcoming EP release next month will most likely make the artist notable. If not, I will delete the userfied page 2 months after the EP release. Thanks. Rubywine . talk 16:49, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
- I was the person who proposed this article for deletion and I endorse the userification of the article for this purpose. --Nat Gertler (talk) 17:06, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
Done to User:Rubywine/Alice Offley. When you think it is ready, first approach user Courcelles (talk) who closed the AfD; if s/he does not agree, you can take it to WP:Deletion review. This page (REFUND) is not intended for articles deleted at AfD. JohnCD (talk) 19:28, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
- Correction - as stated at the head of it, this page may indeed be used to ask for userfication of content deleted at AFD, so this request was perfectly in order; but to request undeletion, one should go first to the closing admin and then to WP:DRV. JohnCD (talk) 20:36, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
cloud engineering
reasoning -24.148.218.40 (talk) 17:14, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
This is an emerging discipline, and there are growing interest and discussions in the industry about this important practice. There are discussion forum and user group establisehd for this, and more research and development are under way that are exchanged and published in the key cloud conferences. Cloud engineering is a critical branch of cloud computing.
Please undelete the article, and advise what further changes should be done. We are working hard to improve this entry as we have planned to add the "cloud engineer" professional skillset to the article, which has shown up a lot in the job boards.
Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:40, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
David Levine Photographer
Just because there are two David Levine's doesn't mean one, the younger should be deleted. His work is on of the 80's defying styles of photography. The Culture club "Karma Chameleon" cover along is Iconic. It seems to me the deletion of David Levine is a personal attack on him by who ever asked for thew deletion as my entry meet your standards and was published. David credentials are sound. his work has been published in many magazine including UK Vogue Rolling stone and many many more his images have been on record sleeve in the millions he is the brother of Producer Steve Levine and is still working with many of those including Boy George. -paul tracy (talk) 17:36, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Levine (photographer), it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Sandstein (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:42, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
World Leaders Entertainment
A prominent television and advertising production company with ties to major cable television networks (i.e. Cartoon Network) and major studios (i.e. Warner Brothers). -TheGoofyGolfer (talk) 03:25, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:34, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Robert Lawrence (folk singer)
CD publisher was cited in links as well as name of latest CD (The Journey Home) -Davidlewis39 (talk) 14:32, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
- But how does he meet the requirements in WP:MUSIC? Every garage band has a CD ... but without notability, he's not encyclopedic...and thus the deletion is valid (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 14:41, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
NTEC, Inc.
G11 states An article about a company or a product which describes its subject from a neutral point of view does not qualify for this criterion and I believe my point of view was neutral. I was adding in more content to address the other deletion concerns when it was deleted because it was considered "advertising". NTEC is a non-profit and doesn't stand to gain from advertising. The content wasn't biased toward or against NTEC, it was factual and accurate. -Oodleday (talk) 21:01, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Not done It was full of promotional language taken straight from the subject's own website, such as "NTEC's facility is designed to provide its program companies with an entrepreneurial and collaborative environment, where founding teams interact with seasoned professionals, service providers and capital providers to address strategic and tactical issues". --Orange Mike | Talk 21:03, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Can it at least get moved to my user space so I can add in more original content, which I was doing while it was deleted? I was literally in the process of adding to it and editing it and someone even said on the talk page that I should be given time to address the concerns. Oodleday (talk) 21:27, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
SME Limited
SME is very important to the history of audio turntable design -212.187.20.95 (talk) 22:17, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Would you please undelete this page?
SME Limited is historically one of the most important manufacturers of turntable tonearms in the world. The SME design is the de facto standard; the majority of turntable tonearms use an SME-compatible headshell mount. Millions after millions of turntables owe their basic tonearm design to SME. It is therefor not understandable why this page was deleted.
Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:02, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
File:Yangon City Development Council.png
image was in use and removed against WPMOS by user in WP:POINT issue-link has been restored -Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 13:35, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
Done & I'll leave it to your capable hands to put it back where you believe it should be. Skier Dude (talk) 04:09, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you sir, uh, dude!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 10:59, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
EDEN (German band)
The band is of historical significance as the first known German band to use progressive rock to spread the Christian message. It also has an international cult following. Xhyljen (talk) 10:27, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
- But how does it meet the specific notability requirements at WP:MUSIC/WP:BAND?? (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:43, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
Opa_(programming_language)
Opa is an open source project which is discussed in many sites -- lots of smaller projects have wikipedia pages -87.231.38.99 (talk) 13:46, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Opa (programming language), it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user TParis (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. — ξxplicit 19:11, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
Jucheck.exe
Please tell me why my Article was deleted -SimpleTecSeo (talk) 10:31, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
Not done First, there is no such thing as "your article". Second, individual executables are typically non-notable, and therefore non-encyclopedic on their own. Jucheck.exe was made into a redirect to the related Sun article, and I have just deleted the article "What is jucheck.exe". Do not recreate non-notable/non-encyclopedic articles - Wikipedia is not a WP:HOWTO guide. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:42, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
Scamtacular
I would like the article moved to my userspace as it isn't offensive and doesn't violate any copyrights - it is a simple case of this website only having references which consist of forums. This website is expanding rapidly so in the near future will be mentioned elsewhere. I have set it up to redirect to the "Scam baiting" page for the time being and have put the page on User:Alexzarach with a few modifications to the referencing. Alexzarach (talk) 15:33, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
FLOPPY (band)
FLOPPY is reasonably notable. What is the minimum amount of notability required by A7 (it seems vague, likely intentionally so)? Several albums by them have been released; they are signed with a recording label. The article's deletion seemed pretty arbitrary. Is the problem that the band is less notable in places people speak english, or something? -Droqen (talk) 14:35, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
- The requirements under WP:MUSIC/WP:BAND are pretty clear ... does it meet them? (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 14:59, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, that's perfect. Apologies for my incorrect assumption. It looks as though they don't quite meet any of those requirements (though they come close). I know absolutely nothing about this website but would THIS be a valid publication? --67.224.93.154 (talk) 16:21, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
- Frome their website: "objective involves assisting Japanese artists to make connections and associations within Europe and America. We work to support artists and their managements as well as assisting them to export their music to a wider audience" - sounds like they are publicists, or sub-contract publicists; not a reliable source by any means. --Orange Mike | Talk 23:22, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, that's perfect. Apologies for my incorrect assumption. It looks as though they don't quite meet any of those requirements (though they come close). I know absolutely nothing about this website but would THIS be a valid publication? --67.224.93.154 (talk) 16:21, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
Germano D'Abramo
Germano D'Abramo is a mathematician, physicist and astronomer who actually discovered asteroids. He also has notable results in his research. He does not simply have an asteroid name, as stated by the "deleter" (User:Atama) -151.82.106.170 (talk) 15:10, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 15:41, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
Jeff Scurran
Someone has deleted my article incorrectly. I am a "Hall of Fame" Coach who works now on an international level as Head Football Coach for Team Stars and Stripes in the Global Bowl, an exhibition game that is played in one city around the world. Also I DID graduate from the Univeristy of Florida with a BS in Advertising from the College of Journalism and Communicatins on March 21, 1970. While I was certainly NOT an "athlete of note" as a walk-on who contributed as a totally unknown, this experienceI helped make me a nationally recognized coach that has produced many DVD's, spoken at hundreds of coaching clinics, and I get coaches from all over the world checking out my Wikipedia page. They all ask now why it has disappeared. My teams went to the Final Four in Arizona 13 out of my last 14 years in HS coaching and my Pima College Team went from no program when I was hired to start it in 2000 to #5 in the US in 2004, winning a nationally televised bowl game (Pilgrim's Pride Bowl in Mt. Pleasant, TX) and receiving natinonal attention. ALL of these FACTS are available as public record, including my educadtion and coaching record. Wikipedia has truly helped people find out information about me and what I have done. I often refer people to Wikipedia to learn about my background and I am offended that the person who deleted me did NOT get the facts correct. It makes me look dishonest. I currently work as a speaker/consultant to youth, high school, college and club athletic teams all over the world, many who have no funding or cooperation and background is my life. Please help me get it back online. -— Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.1.56.45 (talk • contribs) 19:41, 17 August 2011
Not done. This article was deleted as a result of the deletion discussion at WP:Articles for deletion/Jeff Scurran so, as stated at the head of this page, it will nt be restored here. You have already taken the first step by approaching Ron Ritzman (talk), the administrator who closed the deletion discussion: then, if your concerns are not addressed, you can go to WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 21:42, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
Partners Asthma Center
Partners Asthma Center is a non-profit medical organizaiton by Harvard doctors in hospitals of Massachusettes General Hospital and Brigh and Women's hospital in Boston. The page doensn't incldue commercial advertisement. -Asthmalearning (talk) 04:48, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
- Note: Besides promotional nature (and 3 speedies for G11), G12 applied as well, making it uncontroversial. ROBERTMFROMLI | TK/CN 04:51, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Not done and will not be done User warned about G12 & now blocked for same. Skier Dude (talk) 05:10, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Noel Gillespie
I noticed that the reason why Noel Gillespie's article was deleted was because there wasn't evidence of notability nor an independent source here. Well, I have found an article explaining the hiring of Noel Gillespie right here. The full article's title was "Suns Promote Noel Gillespie to Assistant Coach" and the date of its release was June 29, 2010. I'd also like to note that he had eight years of experiance with the Phoenix Suns as an "advance scout" and video coordinator for the team. I don't have any knowledge of what his past article was like, but I'd like to add that link and the information I've received as a sort of hope involving the revival of his page, provided that I have some sort of knowledge involving the past attempt of creating that page. - AGreatPhoenixSunsFan (talk) 04:11, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:25, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Citywire
Citywire seems to be regarded as a reputable source - and rightly so - and is listed as a reference or source in a number of articles. Why it does not have an article of its own anymore seems slightly strange. -CetreCetoen (talk) 07:36, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:28, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Concept of mixing the inefficient martial arts methods
- Concept of mixing the inefficient martial arts methods · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]
This is a valuable article for martial arts and Wikipedia readers. If it has no sources from respectful or reliable magazines or internet sites it does not mean it needs to delete as Wikipedia created for people who wants to know fresh news from any area of people society. Also it has references and link about person and topic of this article what is a good proof of notability. I know some sites in an internet which can provide addtional information which i am going to put in Wikipedia -MarkFleydman1954 (talk) 12:21, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Not done The article is currently under community discussion for deletion here, so please make comments there. Please note, you should read and understand WP:DELETE before commenting, as well as understanding that Wikipedia is WP:NOTNEWS, allows NO original research, and provides only verifiable information from reliable 3rd party sources (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 14:39, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Abdallah daar
OTRS permission received in ticket 2011080410015192 for release of content at http://www.mrcglobal.org/abdallah_daar under CC-BY-SA-3.0 and GFDL by McLaughlin-Rotman Centre for Global Health representative. Please move it and the talk page notice I placed to Abdallah Daar for proper capitalization. Thanks. -– Adrignola talk 14:29, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
- I have restored the article and moved it to Abdallah Daar. -- Ed (Edgar181) 14:41, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Dr. Angelina Loo
OTRS permission received in ticket 2011081710015533 from Centrifuge Media Lab representative for release of content at http://www.bracedinbc.com/About/Dr_Loo under the CC-BY-SA-3.0 license. Centrifuge Media Lab is linked as the website operator at the bottom of http://www.bracedinbc.com. -– Adrignola talk 16:30, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Brett Kimberlin
I dont need the article "undeleted" as I have already recreated it. I would like an admin to email me the content from the deleted version or drop it on my talk page so I can use it to expand the article. Thanks. ZHurlihee (talk) 16:45, 18 August 2011 (UTC) -ZHurlihee (talk) 16:45, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Done email sent. I sent the cleaned version rather than an attack version. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:13, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
EVGA Corporation
It is not an advertisement, its just facts about EVGA -65.113.29.55 (talk) 00:19, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
Done We are getting too many spam nominations for things that are not promotional. This may be due competitors nominating. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:39, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
"Notable Residents" under "Valley Stream, NY" entry for Louis Minott - Last occurred May 25, 2009 @ 01:37
no reason shown -Dave (talk) 03:42, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
I cannot find a reason that this entry was deleted. Dave (talk) 03:42, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
Not done - this page has not yet been deleted. This is just a content issue and you can put that content back yourself. If you look at https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=Valley_Stream,_New_York&oldid=292173697 you can see text that you can use. However Louis Minott has no article and it seems that one was never made, and customary practice is not to have "notable" residents in lists with red links. The best place to talk about this is Talk:Valley Stream, New York. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:34, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
National Society of High School Scholars
Wikipedia deleted our page due to lack of reliable secondary sources. Here is some links to secondary sources that we would like to Wikipedia to review for the undeletion.
- http://americaneedscheerleaders.com/cheers-for-charity/sarahs-journey-continues.html
- http://www.topuniversities.com/student-survival/student-finance/national-society-high-school-scholars
- http://www.mcherald.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20110719/LIFE/107190304/Ramsey+ready+for+competition
- http://www.wtop.com/?nid=109&sid=2467701
- http://www2.starexponent.com/news/2011/jun/28/culpepers-naacp-organization-rewards-local-student-ar-1137910/
-64.238.124.50 (talk) 20:40, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Not done. This article was deleted as a result of the deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Society of High School Scholars so, as explained at the top of this page, it wil not be restored here. You should approach user Postdlf (talk), the administrator who closed the discussion: then, if your concerns are not addressed, you can go to WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 08:35, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
DeleGate (networking)
Delegate is still a viable option for an easy-to-use proxy. Please bring the page back. -Adgordo (talk) 03:55, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
Sorry, but I should note that this is copyvio from[5]. I apologize for this, but I am G12ing it. All but the list is a copy/paste.Best, ROBERTMFROMLI | TK/CN 20:30, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
DynamicLawyer.com
This article exhibits the only Canadian based online legal forms website to offer video guides. LegalZoom and RocketLawyer both have articles that are just as general and may be seen as advertising as well. It is important for the public to understand the growing concept of do-it-yourself legal forms. It a question of access to justice, many people cannot afford a lawyer, and may not qualify for legal-aide therefore to promote access to justice online legal form companies like DynamicLawyers.com should be allowed to create an article on wikipedia.
Thank you, -Jkhlaif (talk) 16:55, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
Not done. Wikipedia is not a business listing directory. The article gave no indication of notability, which has to be shown by references to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. Please read the WP:FAQ/Organizations and WP:Notability (organizations and companies); then, if you think you can meet the requirements, approach user Vejvančický (talk), the deleting administrator. JohnCD (talk) 20:24, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
Collapse_(band) and related articles
- Collapse (band) · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]
- Forward Regression Records · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
- Jason James Mackenzie · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Collapse Album Destroying by Design to be reissued at Forward Regression
Old Label
http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Great_White_North_Records
http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Destroying_by_Design&action=edit&redlink=1
new label
www.forwardregression.com
Collapse has been listed at:
http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Great_White_North_Records
The album is listed at
http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Destroying_by_Design&action=edit&redlink=1
with no page.
Collapse has been listed at the Great White North Records wiki page. The album Collapse-Destroying by Design is listed on the Great While North Page with no band link. This Collapse page is the band link. The album Destroying By Design has a link and no page. The albums is being reissued on Forward Regression Records, the new Collapse label. Previously released on Great White North. Jason James Mackenzie is the Guitarist for Collapse and is on Destroying By Design and also owns Forward Regression Records.
-Impaled666 (talk) 17:05, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
Not done. I have combined your three requests to save space. Being mentioned on other pages is not a reason why they should have stand-alone articles. The question is whether they meet Wikipedia's notability standard explained at WP:BAND, WP:NALBUMS and WP:Notability (people). They were all deleted as a result of a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Collapse (band) so, as stated at the head of this page, they will not be restored here. If you think that was wrongly decided, or you have new information, you should first approach user Spartaz (talk), the administrator who closed the discussion: then, if you are not satisfied, you can go to WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 20:05, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
DisguisesMe
The page that I posted was Speedily Deleted recently. I would like to ask that it be republished. It is an SMTP service that my company created. The product has some similarities to mailanator.com, which is published on wikipedia and referenced under http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Disposable_e-mail_address. If someone searches for Disposable Email Address, it makes sense that it would show up as a disposable email address alternative. -Kevinjosephmorin (talk) 20:59, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. Articles need to have references from independent sources. Also there should be some sort of claim of importance. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:07, 20 August 2011 (UTC)